<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Frmignacco</id>
	<title>Wiki Cours - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Frmignacco"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php/Special:Contributions/Frmignacco"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T05:59:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1701</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1701"/>
		<updated>2021-11-30T23:14:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a function that is constant on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q14: (to do in class only)&#039;&#039;&#039; For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1700</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1700"/>
		<updated>2021-11-30T23:14:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a function that is constant on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q14: (to do in class only)&#039;&#039;&#039; For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1699</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1699"/>
		<updated>2021-11-30T22:31:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Radon transform and X-ray tomography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a function that is constant on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q14: (to do in class only)&#039;&#039;&#039; For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1683</id>
		<title>T-I-2draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1683"/>
		<updated>2021-11-09T13:42:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Link between odd/even and real/imaginary */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=Linear response theory and Kramers-Kronig relations=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the theory of linear response and, among the related properties, such as causality,  the so-called Kramers-Kronig relations.  We will consider the damped harmonic oscillator as a prototypical example to discuss this topic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder on the Fourier transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout this assignment, we will use the symmetric convention of Fourier transform.  The Fourier transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in L^1(\mathbb{R})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widehat f(\omega):=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int d t  \,f(t)\,e^{i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With this convention, the Fourier transform of a product results in a convolution, with the following pre-factor: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
\sqrt{2\pi}\,\widehat{(f\, g)}=\widehat f \ast \widehat g .&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The repeated application of the transform gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \widehat{\widehat f}(t)=f(-t).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conjugate of a Fourier transform is equal to the transform of the conjugate, with a change of sign in the argument: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\overline{\widehat f}(\omega)=\widehat{\overline{f}}(-\omega).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, we can exchange the Fourier transform under the integral sign: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \hat f(t)\, g(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, f(t)\,\hat g(t) .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last property implies the result &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}d\omega \, \overline{\hat f}(\omega)\,\hat g(\omega)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \overline{f(t)}\,\hat g(t) ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
which gives directly the Plancherel theorem (see lecture notes, page 45).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example: damped harmonic oscillator in one dimension ==&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a damped harmonic oscillator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is described by the following equation of motion:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\ddot x + 2 \gamma \,\dot x + \omega _0^2\,x=f(t).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
First, we will compute its response to an harmonic perturbation, and then its response to a generic perturbation by introducing its Green function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to an harmonic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that the oscillator is excited by an harmonic perturbation of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t)=F_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a solution of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=X_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
X_\omega=\hat g(\omega)\, F_\omega,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{(\omega-\omega_1)(\omega-\omega_2)}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Write the explicit form of the poles that we have indicated as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to a generic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a generic perturbation represented  by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, whose Fourier transform is given by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that it follows that &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}d t&#039; \, g(t-t&#039;)f(t&#039;),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function having &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as Fourier transform. The above equation is nothing but  the convolution of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{2\pi}x(t)=(f\ast g)(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Holomorphism of the response and consequences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the response of the system to an impulsive perturbation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)=\sqrt{2\pi}\delta(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is the effect of a perturbation applied at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the solution at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; We have defined &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, i.e. on the real axis. Show that its extension to the complex plane is holomorphic everywhere (except at the poles). Using the explicit expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\widehat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; derived above, compute explicitly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. You will have to treat separately the case of positive time and the case of negative time. Use the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Deduce the expression of the response:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int_{-\infty}^t dt&#039; \, e^{-\gamma (t-t&#039;)}\,\frac{\sin\left[(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2} (t-t&#039;)\right]}{(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2}}f(t&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The above expression indicates the Green function of the system. Notice that the response of the system is causal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth highlighting the importance of the holomorphism in this proof. Indeed, we have seen that we had to apply Jordan&#039;s lemma. Therefore, we need a relatively fast decay of the response function at infinity, i.e. a system that does not diverge. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also point out that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; was negative, we would have lost causality: we can guess a relation between causality and the dissipation of energy in a passive system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General properties of linear response ==&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a generalization of the properties that we have seen in the previous example. We discuss an equation of motion (or possibly another physical equation)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathcal{L}x(t)=f(t),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
with a linear operator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (of differentiation, multiplication, integration, etc.), and with an inhomogeneity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (external stimulation, perturbation, etc.). The generic solution is unknown since the explicit form of the operator is not specified. However, we know that this solution must have some physical properties:&lt;br /&gt;
* Linearity: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function or a linear functional of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which reads &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}ds \, g(t-s)f(s). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Causality: in the sense that the effect cannot precede the cause: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* The total response to a finite perturbation must be finite.&lt;br /&gt;
* The response to a real perturbation, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, must be real as well, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (at least in the case we are not considering quantum mechanics effects).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Link between odd/even and real/imaginary ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show the following properties of the Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in i\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Conclude that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is real, its Fourier transform is written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g=\hat g &#039; +i\hat g &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; even, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; odd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Derive the same properties for the case of the oscillator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries ===&lt;br /&gt;
We define the sign function as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
S(t)=\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
-1 &amp;amp; t&amp;lt;0\\&lt;br /&gt;
+1 &amp;amp;t\geq 0&lt;br /&gt;
\end{cases},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and we want to show that its Fourier transform is&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat S(\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not summable, we have to use an auxiliary function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_\epsilon (t):=e^{-\epsilon |t|}S(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0}\hat S_\epsilon (\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Discuss the possibility of using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S_\epsilon&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a computation (e.g., in the example below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Causality and Kramers-Kronig relations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the expression of the Fourier transform of a convolution and the sign function defined above, show the following property of Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; If  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\quad\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{i\pi}\,{\rm PV} \int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\xi)}{\xi -\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By separating the real and imaginary part of this equation, we obtain Kramers-Kronig relations:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{\pi} \,{\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that Kramers-Kronig relations express the fact that the extension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega + i \nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the complex upper-half plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\nu&amp;gt;0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic, without any poles, and that it decreases sufficiently fast as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\omega +i\nu|\rightarrow \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will start from a weaker result:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Show that the Kramers-Kronig relation is valid for all functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega +i\nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with the aforementioned properties. Apply the residue theorem integrating along the path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; displayed in the figure below, that can be reproduced via the following code:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
gamma = ParametricPlot[{{R Cos[t], R Sin[t]}, {-R*(1 - t/Pi) + (x - r)*t/Pi, 0}, {r Cos[t + Pi] + x, r Sin[t + Pi]}, {(x + r)*(1 - t/Pi) + R*t/Pi, 0}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2,  r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, {t, 0, Pi}, Ticks -&amp;gt; {{{-R, &amp;quot;-R&amp;quot;}, {x - r, &amp;quot;x-r&amp;quot;}, {x, &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;}, {x + r, &amp;quot;x+r&amp;quot;}, {R, &amp;quot;R&amp;quot;}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2, r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, None}, TicksStyle -&amp;gt; Directive[Red, 20], AxesLabel -&amp;gt; {None}] /. Line[u_] :&amp;gt; Sequence[Arrowheads[Table[.05, {1}]], Arrow@Line[u]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gamma_contour.png|400px|thumb|center|Sketch of the integration path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrate the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (z)/(z-\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along this path. Compute the contribution of the small half-circle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the limit &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r\rightarrow 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; using its Taylor expansion in the vicinity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and performing the change of variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&#039;=\omega + r\,e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last result suggests the existence of a relation with the causality at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the fact that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic without poles in the upper-half plane. This was detailed in the Titchmarsch theorem.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1682</id>
		<title>T-I-2draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1682"/>
		<updated>2021-11-09T13:40:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Holomorphism of the response and consequences */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=Linear response theory and Kramers-Kronig relations=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the theory of linear response and, among the related properties, such as causality,  the so-called Kramers-Kronig relations.  We will consider the damped harmonic oscillator as a prototypical example to discuss this topic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder on the Fourier transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout this assignment, we will use the symmetric convention of Fourier transform.  The Fourier transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in L^1(\mathbb{R})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widehat f(\omega):=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int d t  \,f(t)\,e^{i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With this convention, the Fourier transform of a product results in a convolution, with the following pre-factor: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
\sqrt{2\pi}\,\widehat{(f\, g)}=\widehat f \ast \widehat g .&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The repeated application of the transform gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \widehat{\widehat f}(t)=f(-t).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conjugate of a Fourier transform is equal to the transform of the conjugate, with a change of sign in the argument: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\overline{\widehat f}(\omega)=\widehat{\overline{f}}(-\omega).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, we can exchange the Fourier transform under the integral sign: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \hat f(t)\, g(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, f(t)\,\hat g(t) .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last property implies the result &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}d\omega \, \overline{\hat f}(\omega)\,\hat g(\omega)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \overline{f(t)}\,\hat g(t) ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
which gives directly the Plancherel theorem (see lecture notes, page 45).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example: damped harmonic oscillator in one dimension ==&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a damped harmonic oscillator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is described by the following equation of motion:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\ddot x + 2 \gamma \,\dot x + \omega _0^2\,x=f(t).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
First, we will compute its response to an harmonic perturbation, and then its response to a generic perturbation by introducing its Green function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to an harmonic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that the oscillator is excited by an harmonic perturbation of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t)=F_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a solution of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=X_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
X_\omega=\hat g(\omega)\, F_\omega,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{(\omega-\omega_1)(\omega-\omega_2)}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Write the explicit form of the poles that we have indicated as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to a generic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a generic perturbation represented  by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, whose Fourier transform is given by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that it follows that &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}d t&#039; \, g(t-t&#039;)f(t&#039;),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function having &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as Fourier transform. The above equation is nothing but  the convolution of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{2\pi}x(t)=(f\ast g)(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Holomorphism of the response and consequences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the response of the system to an impulsive perturbation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)=\sqrt{2\pi}\delta(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is the effect of a perturbation applied at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the solution at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; We have defined &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, i.e. on the real axis. Show that its extension to the complex plane is holomorphic everywhere (except at the poles). Using the explicit expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\widehat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; derived above, compute explicitly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. You will have to treat separately the case of positive time and the case of negative time. Use the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Deduce the expression of the response:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int_{-\infty}^t dt&#039; \, e^{-\gamma (t-t&#039;)}\,\frac{\sin\left[(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2} (t-t&#039;)\right]}{(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2}}f(t&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The above expression indicates the Green function of the system. Notice that the response of the system is causal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth highlighting the importance of the holomorphism in this proof. Indeed, we have seen that we had to apply Jordan&#039;s lemma. Therefore, we need a relatively fast decay of the response function at infinity, i.e. a system that does not diverge. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also point out that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; was negative, we would have lost causality: we can guess a relation between causality and the dissipation of energy in a passive system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General properties of linear response ==&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a generalization of the properties that we have seen in the previous example. We discuss an equation of motion (or possibly another physical equation)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathcal{L}x(t)=f(t),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
with a linear operator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (of differentiation, multiplication, integration, etc.), and with an inhomogeneity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (external stimulation, perturbation, etc.). The generic solution is unknown since the explicit form of the operator is not specified. However, we know that this solution must have some physical properties:&lt;br /&gt;
* Linearity: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function or a linear functional of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which reads &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}ds \, g(t-s)f(s). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Causality: in the sense that the effect cannot precede the cause: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* The total response to a finite perturbation must be finite.&lt;br /&gt;
* The response to a real perturbation, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, must be real as well, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (at least in the case we are not considering quantum mechanics effects).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Link between odd/even and real/imaginary ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show the following properties of the Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in i\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Conclude that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is real, its Fourier transform is written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g=\hat g &#039; +i\hat g &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; odd, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; even.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Derive the same properties for the case of the oscillator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries ===&lt;br /&gt;
We define the sign function as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
S(t)=\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
-1 &amp;amp; t&amp;lt;0\\&lt;br /&gt;
+1 &amp;amp;t\geq 0&lt;br /&gt;
\end{cases},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and we want to show that its Fourier transform is&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat S(\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not summable, we have to use an auxiliary function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_\epsilon (t):=e^{-\epsilon |t|}S(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0}\hat S_\epsilon (\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Discuss the possibility of using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S_\epsilon&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a computation (e.g., in the example below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Causality and Kramers-Kronig relations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the expression of the Fourier transform of a convolution and the sign function defined above, show the following property of Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; If  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\quad\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{i\pi}\,{\rm PV} \int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\xi)}{\xi -\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By separating the real and imaginary part of this equation, we obtain Kramers-Kronig relations:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{\pi} \,{\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that Kramers-Kronig relations express the fact that the extension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega + i \nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the complex upper-half plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\nu&amp;gt;0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic, without any poles, and that it decreases sufficiently fast as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\omega +i\nu|\rightarrow \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will start from a weaker result:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Show that the Kramers-Kronig relation is valid for all functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega +i\nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with the aforementioned properties. Apply the residue theorem integrating along the path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; displayed in the figure below, that can be reproduced via the following code:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
gamma = ParametricPlot[{{R Cos[t], R Sin[t]}, {-R*(1 - t/Pi) + (x - r)*t/Pi, 0}, {r Cos[t + Pi] + x, r Sin[t + Pi]}, {(x + r)*(1 - t/Pi) + R*t/Pi, 0}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2,  r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, {t, 0, Pi}, Ticks -&amp;gt; {{{-R, &amp;quot;-R&amp;quot;}, {x - r, &amp;quot;x-r&amp;quot;}, {x, &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;}, {x + r, &amp;quot;x+r&amp;quot;}, {R, &amp;quot;R&amp;quot;}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2, r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, None}, TicksStyle -&amp;gt; Directive[Red, 20], AxesLabel -&amp;gt; {None}] /. Line[u_] :&amp;gt; Sequence[Arrowheads[Table[.05, {1}]], Arrow@Line[u]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gamma_contour.png|400px|thumb|center|Sketch of the integration path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrate the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (z)/(z-\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along this path. Compute the contribution of the small half-circle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the limit &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r\rightarrow 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; using its Taylor expansion in the vicinity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and performing the change of variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&#039;=\omega + r\,e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last result suggests the existence of a relation with the causality at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the fact that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic without poles in the upper-half plane. This was detailed in the Titchmarsch theorem.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1681</id>
		<title>T-I-2draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-2draft&amp;diff=1681"/>
		<updated>2021-11-09T13:39:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: Created page with &amp;quot; =Linear response theory and Kramers-Kronig relations=  The goal of this homework is to introduce the theory of linear response and, among the related properties, such as caus...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=Linear response theory and Kramers-Kronig relations=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the theory of linear response and, among the related properties, such as causality,  the so-called Kramers-Kronig relations.  We will consider the damped harmonic oscillator as a prototypical example to discuss this topic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder on the Fourier transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout this assignment, we will use the symmetric convention of Fourier transform.  The Fourier transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in L^1(\mathbb{R})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widehat f(\omega):=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int d t  \,f(t)\,e^{i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With this convention, the Fourier transform of a product results in a convolution, with the following pre-factor: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
\sqrt{2\pi}\,\widehat{(f\, g)}=\widehat f \ast \widehat g .&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The repeated application of the transform gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \widehat{\widehat f}(t)=f(-t).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conjugate of a Fourier transform is equal to the transform of the conjugate, with a change of sign in the argument: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\overline{\widehat f}(\omega)=\widehat{\overline{f}}(-\omega).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, we can exchange the Fourier transform under the integral sign: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \hat f(t)\, g(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, f(t)\,\hat g(t) .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last property implies the result &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int _\mathbb{R}d\omega \, \overline{\hat f}(\omega)\,\hat g(\omega)=\int _\mathbb{R}dt \, \overline{f(t)}\,\hat g(t) ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
which gives directly the Plancherel theorem (see lecture notes, page 45).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example: damped harmonic oscillator in one dimension ==&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a damped harmonic oscillator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is described by the following equation of motion:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\ddot x + 2 \gamma \,\dot x + \omega _0^2\,x=f(t).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
First, we will compute its response to an harmonic perturbation, and then its response to a generic perturbation by introducing its Green function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to an harmonic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that the oscillator is excited by an harmonic perturbation of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t)=F_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a solution of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=X_\omega\,e^{-i\omega t}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
X_\omega=\hat g(\omega)\, F_\omega,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{(\omega-\omega_1)(\omega-\omega_2)}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Write the explicit form of the poles that we have indicated as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Response to a generic perturbation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We consider a generic perturbation represented  by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, whose Fourier transform is given by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that it follows that &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}d t&#039; \, g(t-t&#039;)f(t&#039;),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function having &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g(\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as Fourier transform. The above equation is nothing but  the convolution of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{2\pi}x(t)=(f\ast g)(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Holomorphism of the response and consequences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the response of the system to an impulsive perturbation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)=\delta(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is the effect of a perturbation applied at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the solution at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; We have defined &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, i.e. on the real axis. Show that its extension to the complex plane is holomorphic everywhere (except at the poles). Using the explicit expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\widehat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; derived above, compute explicitly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. You will have to treat separately the case of positive time and the case of negative time. Use the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Deduce the expression of the response:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int_{-\infty}^t dt&#039; \, e^{-\gamma (t-t&#039;)}\,\frac{\sin\left[(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2} (t-t&#039;)\right]}{(\omega_0^2-\gamma^2)^{1/2}}f(t&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The above expression indicates the Green function of the system. Notice that the response of the system is causal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth highlighting the importance of the holomorphism in this proof. Indeed, we have seen that we had to apply Jordan&#039;s lemma. Therefore, we need a relatively fast decay of the response function at infinity, i.e. a system that does not diverge. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also point out that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; was negative, we would have lost causality: we can guess a relation between causality and the dissipation of energy in a passive system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General properties of linear response ==&lt;br /&gt;
We look for a generalization of the properties that we have seen in the previous example. We discuss an equation of motion (or possibly another physical equation)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathcal{L}x(t)=f(t),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
with a linear operator &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (of differentiation, multiplication, integration, etc.), and with an inhomogeneity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (external stimulation, perturbation, etc.). The generic solution is unknown since the explicit form of the operator is not specified. However, we know that this solution must have some physical properties:&lt;br /&gt;
* Linearity: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function or a linear functional of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which reads &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
x(t)=\int _\mathbb{R}ds \, g(t-s)f(s). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Causality: in the sense that the effect cannot precede the cause: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* The total response to a finite perturbation must be finite.&lt;br /&gt;
* The response to a real perturbation, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(t)\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, must be real as well, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (at least in the case we are not considering quantum mechanics effects).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Link between odd/even and real/imaginary ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show the following properties of the Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in i\mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an odd function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g\in \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an odd function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function;&lt;br /&gt;
* if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g\in i\mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an even function, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \hat g\in \mathbb{R} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is also an even function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Conclude that, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is real, its Fourier transform is written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g=\hat g &#039; +i\hat g &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; odd, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; even.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Derive the same properties for the case of the oscillator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries ===&lt;br /&gt;
We define the sign function as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
S(t)=\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
-1 &amp;amp; t&amp;lt;0\\&lt;br /&gt;
+1 &amp;amp;t\geq 0&lt;br /&gt;
\end{cases},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and we want to show that its Fourier transform is&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat S(\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not summable, we have to use an auxiliary function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_\epsilon (t):=e^{-\epsilon |t|}S(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0}\hat S_\epsilon (\omega)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{i}{\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Discuss the possibility of using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat S_\epsilon&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a computation (e.g., in the example below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Causality and Kramers-Kronig relations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the expression of the Fourier transform of a convolution and the sign function defined above, show the following property of Fourier transform:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; If  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,  then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\quad\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{i\pi}\,{\rm PV} \int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\xi)}{\xi -\omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By separating the real and imaginary part of this equation, we obtain Kramers-Kronig relations:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)=\frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Im}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega},&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\operatorname{Im} \hat g(\omega)=-\frac{1}{\pi} \,{\rm PV}\int_\mathbb{R}d\xi \,\frac{\operatorname{Re}\hat g(\omega)}{\xi-\omega}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q13:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that Kramers-Kronig relations express the fact that the extension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega + i \nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the complex upper-half plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\nu&amp;gt;0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic, without any poles, and that it decreases sufficiently fast as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\omega +i\nu|\rightarrow \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will start from a weaker result:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Show that the Kramers-Kronig relation is valid for all functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (\omega +i\nu)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with the aforementioned properties. Apply the residue theorem integrating along the path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; displayed in the figure below, that can be reproduced via the following code:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
gamma = ParametricPlot[{{R Cos[t], R Sin[t]}, {-R*(1 - t/Pi) + (x - r)*t/Pi, 0}, {r Cos[t + Pi] + x, r Sin[t + Pi]}, {(x + r)*(1 - t/Pi) + R*t/Pi, 0}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2,  r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, {t, 0, Pi}, Ticks -&amp;gt; {{{-R, &amp;quot;-R&amp;quot;}, {x - r, &amp;quot;x-r&amp;quot;}, {x, &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;}, {x + r, &amp;quot;x+r&amp;quot;}, {R, &amp;quot;R&amp;quot;}} /. {R -&amp;gt; 2, r -&amp;gt; 0.5, x -&amp;gt; 1}, None}, TicksStyle -&amp;gt; Directive[Red, 20], AxesLabel -&amp;gt; {None}] /. Line[u_] :&amp;gt; Sequence[Arrowheads[Table[.05, {1}]], Arrow@Line[u]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gamma_contour.png|400px|thumb|center|Sketch of the integration path &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrate the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat g (z)/(z-\omega)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along this path. Compute the contribution of the small half-circle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the limit &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r\rightarrow 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; using its Taylor expansion in the vicinity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and performing the change of variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&#039;=\omega + r\,e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last result suggests the existence of a relation with the causality at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g(t)=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall t&amp;lt;0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the fact that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is holomorphic without poles in the upper-half plane. This was detailed in the Titchmarsch theorem.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1649</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1649"/>
		<updated>2021-10-16T07:29:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a function that is constant on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is about a documentation project that should be done in pairs. Each pair of students will present their work at the blackboard in ~5 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, you should specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. You should verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1648</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1648"/>
		<updated>2021-10-16T05:16:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Hand calculations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a function that is constant on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1647</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1647"/>
		<updated>2021-10-16T05:12:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1646</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1646"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:40:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Inversion formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the projection-slice theorem, show that the inversion formula of the Radon transform is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\pi\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|k|\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})\,e^{+i(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{u_t})k}\,\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\Phi.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1645</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1645"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:37:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Inversion formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\hat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1644</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1644"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:36:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Inversion formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\widetilde{(\widehat f)}\,(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1643</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1643"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:36:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Inversion formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\tilde{(\hat f)}(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1642</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1642"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:35:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Projection-slice theorem */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimensional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the meaning of the Fourier transform of a function of one variable and of two variables. From the projection-slice theorem, deduce an interpretation of the two-dimensional Fourier transform in terms of the one-dimensional Fourier transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inversion formula ===&lt;br /&gt;
For brevity, we choose to denote the one-dimensional Fourier transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) of the Radon transform (notation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\tilde{(\hat f)}(k,\mathbf{u_t})=\mathrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f (t,\textbf{u_t})\right)[k].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1641</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1641"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:27:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Projection-slice theorem */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or, similarly, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\textrm{TF}_{1D(t)}\left(\hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})\right)[k]=\textrm{TF}_{2D}\left( f(x,y)\right)[k\mathbf{u_t}].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of medical imaging, this relation is called &#039;&#039;projection-slice theorem&#039;&#039;. It relates the two-dimesnional Fourier transform of a function to its Radon transform.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1640</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1640"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:23:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Back-projection formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 displays the application of the back-projection formula to the examples that we have previously considered (binary images), as well as to an example from medical imaging context. Does the back-projection formula allow to inverse the Radon transform? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Projection-slice theorem === &lt;br /&gt;
Show that, for a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the one-dimensional Fourier transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over the variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to the two-dimensional transform of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(\mathbf{r})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\hat f (t,\mathbf{u_t})\, e^{-ikt}\,\mathrm{d}t =\int \int f(\mathbf{r})\, e^{-i(k\mathbf{u_t})\cdot \mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
or&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1639</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1639"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:15:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Back-projection formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}\Phi,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1638</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1638"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:14:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}t,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:images_radon.png | 800px| thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:back_projection.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Illustration of the back-projection formula.]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1637</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1637"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:13:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Back-projection formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}t,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Some images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;... and the back-projection of their Radon transform.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Back_projection.png&amp;diff=1636</id>
		<title>File:Back projection.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Back_projection.png&amp;diff=1636"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:12:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Images_radon.png&amp;diff=1635</id>
		<title>File:Images radon.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Images_radon.png&amp;diff=1635"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:11:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1634</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1634"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:05:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Back-projection formula */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039; Explain why the following function&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\hat f (\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_t})\,\mathrm{d}t,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
obtained via an angular mean of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is likely to resemble to the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This formula is called &#039;&#039;back-projection formula&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1633</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1633"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T21:01:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Principles of X-ray tomography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The following section addresses the principle at the basis of this inversion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inversion of the Radon transform==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Back-projection formula===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q12:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1632</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1632"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:59:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q11:&#039;&#039;&#039; Show that in the case of radial function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=F(r)=F(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Radon transform can be written as a simple integral transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Principles of X-ray tomography==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the physical principles underlying X-ray tomography? In particular, we will specify which physical quantity is measured, and which quantity we try to reconstruct in form of an image. We will verify that we can express the measured quantities as a Radon transform of the parameter that we try to image. X-ray tomography is based on the inversion of the Radon transform, knowing how to deduce &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a measure of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1631</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1631"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:53:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Definition: &#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: &#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1630</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1630"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:53:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Definition: ==== The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: ==== The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1629</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1629"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:52:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition of Radon transform ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Definition:==== The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:==== The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Hand calculations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expression for radial functions ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1628</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1628"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:50:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Some examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Some examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== No calculation needed ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hand calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1627</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1627"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:50:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Hand calculations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hand calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1626</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1626"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:49:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hand calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q9:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of a constant function on a disc of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and null outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q10:&#039;&#039;&#039; Compute the Radon transform of the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(x,y)=a\,\exp\left(-\frac{x^2+y^2}{\sigma^2}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1625</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1625"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:45:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists one unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate (without doing any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a quasi-point-like support. Similarly, indicate (without any calculation) the profile of the Radon transform of a constant function on a line, and on a line segment.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1624</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1624"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:28:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order):&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Indicate, without doing any calculation, the profile of a Radon transform of a constant function on&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1623</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1623"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:24:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; Some binary images...&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt; ... and their Radon transform (in random order).&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| &#039;&#039;&#039; Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Qualitative illustration of the Radon transform.]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1622</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1622"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:21:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:binary_images.png | 800px|thumb|center| Some binary images...]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:radon_transform.png | 800px| thumb|center| ... and their Radon transform (in random order).]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Radon_transform.png&amp;diff=1621</id>
		<title>File:Radon transform.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Radon_transform.png&amp;diff=1621"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:17:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Binary_images.png&amp;diff=1620</id>
		<title>File:Binary images.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=File:Binary_images.png&amp;diff=1620"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:17:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1619</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1619"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:14:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== No calculation needed === &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Q7: &#039;&#039;&#039;In Figure 2, match each image with the corresponding Radon transform. Images represent functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Specify the meaning of the grey scales in the different figures. Draw the axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t,\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the Radon transforms, knowing that in the images in the direct space (plane &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the origin of axes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is located at the center of the figure.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1618</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1618"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:09:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From now on, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1617</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1617"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:09:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). Give a geometrical interpretation of the Radon transform in dimension &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what follows, we will always consider the Radon transform in the two-dimensional case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1616</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1616"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Using the relation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t&#039; \mathbf{u_{t&#039;}}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\delta(t&#039;-t)\mathrm{d}t&#039;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
propose a definition of Radon transform in the form of a surface integral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Propose a definition of the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\geq 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1615</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1615"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:02:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_\Phi})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1614</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1614"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:01:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 \hat f(t,\mathbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\mathbf{u_t}+s\mathbf{u_s})\,\mathrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1613</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1613"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T20:00:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f (t \textbf{u_t} + s \textbf{u_s})= &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1612</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1612"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:58:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Definition:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution:&#039;&#039;&#039; The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q5:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1611</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1611"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:56:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Definition of Radon transform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition: === The Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by the following expression&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\hat f (t,\textbf{u_t})=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(t\textbf{u_t}+s\textbf{u_s})\,\textrm{d}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Use of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta-&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;distribution: === The definition of Radon transform can be elegantly written by means of the Dirac-delta distribution. This formulation provides the advantage of generalising the definition of Radon transform to arbitrary dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1610</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1610"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:52:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definition of Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Definition: === the Radon transform of a function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat f : \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1609</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1609"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:49:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \,\textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \,\textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1608</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1608"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:49:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A natural pair of coordinates, associated to the family of lines obtained from a given &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is the pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)\in \mathbb{R}^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of coordinates of a point in the basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{u_t},\mathbf{u_\Phi})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; related to the line that passes through that point. Provide the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as well as the expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a function of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Deduce the relation between the surface elements &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}x \textrm{d}y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{d}s \textrm{d}t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1607</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1607"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:39:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1606</id>
		<title>T-I-3draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lptms.universite-paris-saclay.fr//wiki-cours/index.php?title=T-I-3draft&amp;diff=1606"/>
		<updated>2021-10-15T19:39:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frmignacco: /* Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Radon transform and X-ray tomography=&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this homework is to introduce the Radon transform of a two-dimensional function. We will show that this transform is invertible and the inverse involves the Fourier transform in two dimensions. From a practical point of view, the Radon transform is the basis of X-ray tomography (as well as X-ray scanning), applied in the medical context in order to obtain cross-section images of different organs.&lt;br /&gt;
The second part of the homework consists of a documentation work to be conducted in pairs: each pair of students should prepare a blackboard presentation of approximately five minutes on this part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radon transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Preliminaries: parametrisation of a line in the plane ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Line_parametrisation.png |thumb|right| &#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Parametrisation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a line in the plane.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q1:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a two-dimensional space, how many parameters are needed in order to define a line? Provide some examples of equations that define a unique line in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q2:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the context of Radon transform, we choose to define a line via the parameters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)\in \mathbb{R}\times [0;2\pi[&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, displayed in Figure 1. Each angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is associated to a unique unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_t} = \cos(\Phi) \mathbf{u_x}+ \sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each given line there exist two possible pairs of values &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Q3:&#039;&#039;&#039; We choose to &#039;&#039;orient&#039;&#039;  the line positively along the unit vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{u_{\Phi}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, defined by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{u_{\Phi}} = -\sin(\Phi)\mathbf{u_x} + \cos(\Phi)\mathbf{u_y}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Show that for each pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(t,\Phi)&amp;lt;/math/&amp;gt; there exists a unique &#039;&#039;oriented&#039;&#039; line.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frmignacco</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>