|
|
Line 32: |
Line 32: |
|
| |
|
| == The second moment == | | == The second moment == |
| * Step 1: | | * Step 1: The second moment is |
| | <center> <math> |
| | \overline{Z[x_t,t]^2 } =\int {\cal D} x_1\int {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 \right] \overline{\exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int d \tau V(x_1(\tau),\tau ) - \frac{1}{T} \int d \tau V(x_2(\tau),\tau )\right]} |
| | </math></center> |
| | * Step 2: Use Wick and derive: |
| <center> <math> | | <center> <math> |
| \overline{Z[x_t,t]^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2} \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right] | | \overline{Z[x_t,t]^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2} \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right] |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
| Now you can change coordinate <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math> and get: | | * Step 3:Now change coordinate <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math> and get: |
| <center> <math> | | <center> <math> |
| \overline{Z[x_t,t]^2} = (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2- \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]} | | \overline{Z[x_t,t]^2} = (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2- \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u \exp\left[- \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]} |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
| Hence, the quantity <math>\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}/ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2</math> can be computed. | | Hence, the quantity <math>\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}/ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2</math> can be computed. |
| * Remark 1: From T-I, remember that if
| | <Strong>Remark 1:<Strong> From T-I, remember that if |
| <center> <math> | | <center> <math> |
| \frac{\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}}{ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2}=1 | | \frac{\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}}{ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2}=1 |
Revision as of 15:57, 11 February 2024
Goal : final lecture on KPZ and directed polymers at finite dimension. We will show that for
a "glass transition" takes place.
KPZ : from
to the Cayley tree
We know a lot about KPZ, but still we have much to understand:
- In
we found
and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctions of quantities like
. However it does not identify the actual distribution of
for a given
. In particular we have no idea from where Tracy Widom comes from.
- In
, there is an exact solution for the Cayley tree that predicts a freezing transition to an 1RSB phase (
).
- In finite dimension, but larger than 1, there are no exact solutions. Numerical simulations find
in
. The case
is very interesting.
Let's do replica!
To make progress in disordered systems we have to go through the moments of the partition function. For simplicity we consider polymers starting in
and ending in
. We recall that
is a Gaussian field with
- From the Wick theorem, for a generic Gaussian
field we have
The first moment
The first moment of the partition function is
Note that the term
has a short distance divergence due to the delta-function. Hence we can write:
The second moment
- Step 1: The second moment is
- Step 2: Use Wick and derive:
- Step 3:Now change coordinate
and get:
Hence, the quantity
can be computed.
Remark 1: From T-I, remember that if
![{\displaystyle {\frac {\overline {Z[x_{t},t]^{2}}}{({\overline {Z[x_{t},t]}})^{2}}}=1}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c783ff5c186867bcdfabef72e57ba0b1997f76db)
the partition function is self-averaging and
.
The condition above is sufficient but not necessary. It is enough that
when
to have the equivalence between annealed and quenched averages.
- Remark II: From L-3, we derive using Feynman-Kac, the following equation

Now the Hamiltonian reads:
![{\displaystyle H=-2T\nabla ^{2}-{\frac {D}{T^{2}}}\delta ^{d}[u]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/292248d0f2bbdd972e4c668f8cad443f723df923)
It is a