L-6: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
<Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.
<Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.


= Fully connected model foor the cellular automata (mean field)=
= Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton=
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture.
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture.
We introduce two approximations:
   
   
* The elastic coupling is with all neighbours
* Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction
<center><math> \sigma_i=  h_{CM} - h_i + m^2(w-h_i),  \quad    </math></center>.
<center><math> \sigma_i=  h_{CM} - h_i + m^2(w-h_i),  \quad    </math></center>.


* The local random threshold are  all equal:
 
* The local threshold are  all equal. In particular we set
<center> <math> \sigma_i^{th}=1, \quad \forall i
<center> <math> \sigma_i^{th}=1, \quad \forall i
  </math></center>.
  </math></center>.




As a consequence, in the limit <math>L\to \infty</math>, the statistical properties of the system are  described by the  distribution of the local stresses <math> \sigma_i </math>. For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold
<center><math> x_i = 1-\sigma_i
</math></center>
Our goal is thus to determine their distribution <math>P_w(x)</math>, given their intial distribution, <math>P_0(x)</math>, and a value of <math> w </math>.




Instead of following the evoluion of the <math> \sigma_i </math>, it is useful to introduce the distance from threshold
<center><math> x_i = 1-\sigma_i
</math></center>
Hence, an unstable point, <math>x_i<0 </math>, is stabilized  to a value <math>x>0 </math> drawn from  <math>g(x) </math>.
Hence, an unstable point, <math>x_i<0 </math>, is stabilized  to a value <math>x>0 </math> drawn from  <math>g(x) </math>.
The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is <math> \frac{1}{L} \frac{x}{1+m^2}  </math>
The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is <math> \frac{1}{L} \frac{x}{1+m^2}  </math>




In the limit <math>L\to \infty</math> we define the distribution <math>P_w(x)</math> and write its evolution equation.  
we define and write its evolution equation.  


* Drive: Changing <math>w\to w+dw</math> gives  <center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>
* Drive: Changing <math>w\to w+dw</math> gives  <center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>

Revision as of 15:50, 29 February 2024

Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process

Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.

Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton

Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:

  • Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction

.


  • The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set

.


As a consequence, in the limit , the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses . For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold

Our goal is thus to determine their distribution , given their intial distribution, , and a value of .


Hence, an unstable point, , is stabilized to a value drawn from . The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is


we define  and write its evolution equation. 
  • Drive: Changing gives
  • Instability: This shift is stable far from the origin, however for a fraction of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be . Hence, one writes
  • Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of

where

  • Avalanche: Let us call we can write

and finally:

Stationary solution

Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:

  • Determne using
  • Show