L-6: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables


* <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w \to w + \dd w</math> each point decreases its distance to threshold  
* <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w \to w + dw</math> each point decreases its distance to threshold  
<center><math> x_i \to x_i - m^2 \dd w   </math></center>.
<center><math> x_i \to x_i - m^2 dw   </math></center>.
As a consequence
As a consequence
<center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>
<center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>
Line 32: Line 32:
*  <Strong> Instability 1: Stress drop  </Strong>  The instability occurs when a point is at <math> x_i =0 </math>. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
*  <Strong> Instability 1: Stress drop  </Strong>  The instability occurs when a point is at <math> x_i =0 </math>. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
<center> <math> x_i =0 \to x_i = \Delta  </math></center>
<center> <math> x_i =0 \to x_i = \Delta  </math></center>
Increasing <math>w \to w + \dd w</math>,  a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
Increasing <math>w \to w + dw</math>,  a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>


*  <Strong> Instability 2: Stress redistribution  </Strong>  The stress drop induces a stress redistribution and all blocks approach threshold.
<center><math>  
<center><math>  
\begin{cases}
x_i \to = x_i +\frac{1}{L} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2}  
\sigma_i=\sigma_i -\Delta  \quad \text{stress drop}\\ 
\\
\sigma_{i\pm 1}=\sigma_{i\pm 1} +\frac{1}{2} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2} \quad \text{stress redistribution}\\
\end{cases}
  </math></center>
  </math></center>
Note that <math> \Delta</math> is a positive random variable drwan from  <math> g(\Delta)</math>.


Hence, an unstable point, <math>x_i<0 </math>, is stabilized  to a value <math>x>0 </math> drawn from  <math>g(x) </math>.
The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is <math> \frac{1}{L} \frac{x}{1+m^2}  </math>




we define  and write its evolution equation.


* Drive: Changing <math>w\to w+dw</math> gives 
* Instability:  This shift is stable far from the origin, however for a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>
* Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of   
* Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of   
<center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center>
<center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center>

Revision as of 17:58, 29 February 2024

Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process

Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.

Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton

Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:

  • Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction

.


  • The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set

.


As a consequence, in the limit , the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses . For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold

Our goal is thus to determine their distribution , given their intial distribution, , and a value of .

Dynamics

Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables

  • Drive: Increasing each point decreases its distance to threshold

.

As a consequence


  • Instability 1: Stress drop The instability occurs when a point is at . Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):

Increasing , a fraction of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes . Hence, one writes


  • Instability 2: Stress redistribution The stress drop induces a stress redistribution and all blocks approach threshold.



  • Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of

where

  • Avalanche: Let us call we can write

and finally:

Stationary solution

Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:

  • Determne using
  • Show