L-6: Difference between revisions
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* <Strong> Instability 2: Stress redistribution </Strong> The stress drop induces a stress redistribution | * <Strong> Instability 2: Stress redistribution </Strong> The stress drop of a single block induces a stress redistribution where all blocks approach threshold. | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
x_i \to = x_i +\frac{1}{L} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2} | x_i \to = x_i +\frac{1}{L} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
The total stress drop is <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) \int d x x g(x) = m^2 d w P_w(0) \overline{x} </math> hence | |||
all points move to the origin of | |||
<center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center> | <center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center> | ||
part of them shifts, part of them become unstable... we can write | |||
<center> <math>\partial_w P_{w}(x) = m^2 \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] \left[ 1+P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} + (P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2})^2 +\ldots\right] </math> </center> | <center> <math>\partial_w P_{w}(x) = m^2 \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] \left[ 1+P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} + (P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2})^2 +\ldots\right] </math> </center> | ||
and finally: | and finally: | ||
<center> <math>\partial_w P_{w}(x) = \frac{m^2 }{1 -P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2}} \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center> | <center> <math>\partial_w P_{w}(x) = \frac{m^2 }{1 -P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2}} \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center> | ||
==== Stationary solution==== | ==== Stationary solution==== | ||
Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point: | Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point: |
Revision as of 18:06, 29 February 2024
Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process
Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.
Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:
- Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction
.
- The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set
.
As a consequence, in the limit , the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses . For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold
Our goal is thus to determine their distribution , given their intial distribution, , and a value of .
Dynamics
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables
- Drive: Increasing each point decreases its distance to threshold
.
As a consequence
- Instability 1: Stress drop The instability occurs when a point is at . Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
Increasing , a fraction of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes . Hence, one writes
- Instability 2: Stress redistribution The stress drop of a single block induces a stress redistribution where all blocks approach threshold.
The total stress drop is hence
all points move to the origin of
part of them shifts, part of them become unstable... we can write
and finally:
Stationary solution
Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:
- Determne using
- Show