L-6: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 75: Line 75:
* The mean value of the kick is  
* The mean value of the kick is  
<center><math> x_{\text{kick}}= \frac{\overline{\Delta}}{(1+m^2)L} </math></center>
<center><math> x_{\text{kick}}= \frac{\overline{\Delta}}{(1+m^2)L} </math></center>
Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the  average  position of the most unstable block is
Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the  average  position of the most unstable block is
<center><math> \int_0^x_1 P_w(t) dt =\frac{1}{L}  </math></center>
<center><math> \int_0^x_1 P_w(t) dt =\frac{1}{L}  </math></center>
For large systems we have
Hence, for large systems we have
 
<center><math> x_1 \sim \frac{1}{L P_w(0),}  </math></center>
<center><math> x_1 \sim \frac{1}{L P_w(0)}  </math></center>
  The mean kick received by
  The mean kick received by

Revision as of 20:27, 1 March 2024

Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process

Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.

Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton

Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:

  • Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction

.


  • The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set

.


As a consequence, in the limit , the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses . For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold

Our goal is thus to determine their distribution , given their intial distribution, , and a value of .

Dynamics

Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables

  • Drive: Increasing each point decreases its distance to threshold

.

As a consequence


  • Instability 1: Stress drop The instability occurs when a point is at . Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):

Increasing , a fraction of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes . Hence, one writes


  • Instability 2: Stress redistribution The stress drop of a single block induces a stress redistribution where all blocks approach threshold.

The total stress drop is hence all points move to the origin of

part of them shifts, part of them become unstable... we can write

and finally:

Stationary solution

Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:

  • Determne using
  • Show

which is well normalized.

Critical Force

The average distance from the threshold gives a simple relation for the critical force, namely . Hence for the automata model we obtain:

Exercise:

Let's assume an exponential distribution of the thresholds and show

Avalanches or instability?

Given the initial condition and , the state of the system is described by . For each unstable block, all the blocks receive a kick.

  • The mean value of the kick is

Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the average position of the most unstable block is

Failed to parse (Conversion error. Server ("https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_") reported: "Cannot get mml. TeX parse error: Double subscripts: use braces to clarify"): {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{x}_{1}P_{w}(t)dt={\frac {1}{L}}}

Hence, for large systems we have

The mean kick received by