|
|
Line 76: |
Line 76: |
| <center><math> x_{\text{kick}}= \frac{\overline{\Delta}}{(1+m^2)L} </math></center> | | <center><math> x_{\text{kick}}= \frac{\overline{\Delta}}{(1+m^2)L} </math></center> |
| Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the average position of the most unstable block is | | Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the average position of the most unstable block is |
| <center><math> \int_0^x_1 P_w(t) dt =\frac{1}{L} </math></center> | | <center><math> \int_0^{x_1} P_w(t) dt =\frac{1}{L} </math></center> |
| Hence, for large systems we have | | Hence, for large systems we have |
| <center><math> x_1 \sim \frac{1}{L P_w(0),} </math></center> | | <center><math> x_1 \sim \frac{1}{L P_w(0)}, \; x_2 \sim \frac{2}{L P_w(0)}, \; x_3 \sim \frac{3}{L P_w(0)}, \ldots </math></center> |
| The mean kick received by
| |
Revision as of 20:30, 1 March 2024
Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process
Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.
Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture.
We introduce two approximations:
- Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction

.
- The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set

.
As a consequence, in the limit
, the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses
. For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold
Our goal is thus to determine their distribution
, given their intial distribution,
, and a value of
.
Dynamics
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables
- Drive: Increasing
each point decreases its distance to threshold

.
As a consequence
- Instability 1: Stress drop The instability occurs when a point is at
. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
Increasing
, a fraction
of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes
. Hence, one writes
- Instability 2: Stress redistribution The stress drop of a single block induces a stress redistribution where all blocks approach threshold.
The total stress drop is
hence all points move to the origin of
part of them shifts, part of them become unstable... we can write
and finally:
Stationary solution
Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:
- Determne
using
which is well normalized.
Critical Force
The average distance from the threshold gives a simple relation for the critical force, namely
. Hence for the automata model we obtain:
Exercise:
Let's assume an exponential distribution of the thresholds and show


Avalanches or instability?
Given the initial condition and
, the state of the system is described by
. For each unstable block, all the blocks receive a kick.
- The mean value of the kick is
Is this kick able to destabilize another block? The equation setting the average position of the most unstable block is
Hence, for large systems we have
