|
|
Line 85: |
Line 85: |
|
| |
|
| <Strong> Quenched and Annealed averages </Strong> | | <Strong> Quenched and Annealed averages </Strong> |
| For the log-normal distribution the mean <math> \overline{\Pi_N} = \exp[(\gamma-\gamma_2^2) N]</math> is larger than the median value <math> \Pi_N^{median} \exp(\gamma N)</math> (which is larger than the mode). Hence, <math> \Pi_N </math> is not self averaging, while its logarithm is self averaging. | | |
| | For the log-normal distribution the mean <math> \overline{\Pi_N} = \exp[(\gamma-\gamma_2^2) N]</math> is larger than the median value <math> \Pi_N^{\text{median}} = \exp(\gamma N)</math> (which is larger than the mode). Hence, <math> \Pi_N </math> is not self averaging, while <math> \ln \Pi_N </math> is self averaging. This is the reason why in the following we will take quenched averages. |
|
| |
|
| === Product of random matrices=== | | === Product of random matrices=== |
Revision as of 09:09, 17 March 2024
Goal: we will introduce the Anderson model, discuss the behaviour as a function of the dimension. In 1d localization can be connected to the product of random matrices.
Anderson model (tight bindind model)
We consider disordered non-interacting particles hopping between nearest neighbors sites on a lattice. The hamiltonian reads:
The single particle hamiltonian in 1d reads
For simplicity we set the hopping
. The disorder are iid random variables drawn, uniformly from the box
.
The final goal is to study the statistical properties of eigensystem
Density of states (DOS)
In 1d and in absence of disorder, the dispersion relation is
. From the dispersion relation, we compute the density of states (DOS) :
In presence of disorder the DOS becomes larger, and display sample to sample fluctuations. One can consider its mean value, avergaed over disorder realization.
Eigenstates
In absence of disorder the eigenstates are plane waves delocalized along all the system. In presence of disorder, three situations can occur and to distinguish them it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio, IPR
The normalization imposes
and
.
- Delocalized eigenstates In this case,
. Hence, we expect
- Localized eigenstates In this case,
for
sites and zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
- Multifractal eigenstates At the transition, namely at the mobility edge, an anomalous scaling is observed elsewhere. Hence, we expect
Here
is q-dependent fractal dimension, smaller than
.
Transfer matrices and Lyapunov exponents
Product of random variables and Central limit theorem
Consider a set of positive iid random variables
with finite mean and variance and compute their product
For large N, the Central Limit Theorem predicts:
is a Gaussian number of zero mean and unit variance
are N indepent and can be written as
Log-normal distribution
The distribution of
is log-normal
Quenched and Annealed averages
For the log-normal distribution the mean
is larger than the median value
(which is larger than the mode). Hence,
is not self averaging, while
is self averaging. This is the reason why in the following we will take quenched averages.
Product of random matrices
Instead of imposing Dirichelet boundary condition on the extremeties of the box we can impose Cauchy boundaries on one side of the box. Let's rewrite the previous eigensystem in the following form
We can continue the recusion
It is useful to intruduce the transfer matrix
and the product of random matrices
Failed to parse (unknown function "\codt"): {\displaystyle M_n= T_n \cdot T_{n-1} \codt\ldots T_1 }