|
|
Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| === Problem 3: the quenched free energy === | | === Problem 3: the quenched free energy === |
|
| |
|
| In this final exercise, we show how the freezing transition can be understood in terms of extreme valued statistics (discussed in the lecture) and localization. We consider the energies of the configurations and define <math> E_\alpha= - N \sqrt{\log 2} + \delta E_\alpha </math>, so that
| |
| <center><math>
| |
| {Z} = e^{ \beta N \sqrt{\log 2} }\sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} e^{-\beta \delta E_\alpha}= e^{ \beta N \sqrt{\log 2} }\sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} z_\alpha
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| We show that <math> Z </math> is a sum of random variables that become heavy tailed for <math> T < T_c </math>, implying that the central limit theorem is violated and this sum is dominated by few terms, the largest ones. This can be interpreted as the occurrence of localization.
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| <ol> | | <ol> |
| <li> <em> Heavy tails and concentration.</em> Compute the distribution of the variables <math> \delta E_\alpha </math> and show that for <math> (\delta E)^2/N \ll 1 </math> this is an exponential. Using this, compute the distribution of the <math> z_\alpha </math> and show that it is a power law, | | <li> <em> Heavy tails and concentration.</em> ccc</li> |
| <center><math>
| |
| p(z)= \frac{c}{z^{1+\mu}} \quad \quad \mu= \frac{2 \sqrt{\log 2}}{\beta}
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| When <math> T < T_c </math>, one has <math> \mu<1 </math>: the distribution of <math> z </math> becomes heavy tailed. What does this imply for the sum <math> Z </math>? Is this consistent with the behaviour of the partition function and of the entropy discussed in Problem 2? Why can one talk about a localization or condensation transition?</li>
| |
| </ol> | | </ol> |
| <br> | | <br> |
|
| |
|
| <ol start="2"> | | <ol start="2"> |
| <li><em> Inverse participation ratio.</em> The low temperature behaviour of the partition function an be characterized in terms of a standard measure of localization (or condensation), the Inverse Participation Ratio (IPR) defined as: | | <li><em> Inverse participation ratio.</em> cccc |
| <center><math>
| |
| IPR= \frac{\sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} z_\alpha^2}{[\sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} z_\alpha]^2}= \sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} \omega_\alpha^2 \quad \quad \omega_\alpha=\frac{ z_\alpha}{\sum_{\alpha=1}^{2^N} z_\alpha}.
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| When <math> z </math> is power law distributed with exponent <math> \mu </math>, one can show (HOMEWORK!) that
| |
| <center><math>
| |
| IPR= \frac{\Gamma(2-\mu)}{\Gamma(\mu) \Gamma(1-\mu)}.
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| Discuss how this quantity changes across the transition at <math> \mu=1 </math>, and how this fits with what you expect in general in a localized phase.
| |
| </li> | | </li> |
| </ol> | | </ol> |
| <br> | | <br> |
Revision as of 18:34, 6 December 2023
In this set of problems, we use the replica method to study the equilibrium properties of a prototypical toy model of glasses, the spherical
-spin model.
Problem 1: getting acquainted with the model
In the spherical
-spin model the configurations
that the system can take satisfy the spherical constraint
, and the energy associated to each configuration is
where the coupling constants
are independent random variables with Gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance
and
is an integer.
- Energy correlations. At variance with the REM, in the spherical
-spin the energies at different configurations are correlated. Show that
, where
is the overlap between the two configurations. Why an we say that for
this model converges with the REM discussed in the previous TD?
Problem 2: the annealed free energy
In TD1, we defined the quenched free energy density as the quantity controlling the scaling of the typical value of the partition function
. The annealed free energy
instead controls the scaling of the average value of
. It is defined by
Let us compute this quantity.
- Show that computing
boils down to computing the average
. Compute this average, using that
The partition function the REM reads
Using the behaviour of the typical value of
determined in Problem 1, derive the free energy of the model (hint: perform a saddle point calculation). What is the order of this thermodynamic transition?
- Entropy. What happens to the entropy of the model when the critical temperature is reached, and in the low temperature phase? What does this imply for the partition function
?
- Fluctuations, and back to average vs typical. Similarly to what we did for the entropy, one can define an annealed free energy
from
: show that in the whole low-temperature phase this is smaller than the quenched free energy obtained above. Putting all the results together, justify why the average of the partition function in the low-T phase is "dominated by rare events".
Comment: the low-T phase of the REM is a frozen phase, characterized by the fact that the free energy is temperature independent, and that the typical value of the partition function is very different from the average value. In fact, the low-T phase is also
in the sense discussed in the lecture. It is characterized by the fact that Replica Symmetry is broken, as one sees explicitly by re-deriving the free energy through the replica method. We go back to this in the next lectures/TDs.
Problem 3: the quenched free energy
- Heavy tails and concentration. ccc
- Inverse participation ratio. cccc