L-4: Difference between revisions
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
For the second moment we need two replicas: | For the second moment we need two replicas: | ||
* Step 1 | |||
<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2\Big)\Bigg] \; \overline{\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_1(\tau),\tau) - \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_2(\tau),\tau)\Bigg]}. </math> </center> | <center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2\Big)\Bigg] \; \overline{\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_1(\tau),\tau) - \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_2(\tau),\tau)\Bigg]}. </math> </center> | ||
* Step 2: Wick’s Theorem | |||
<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \exp\!\Bigg[\frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2}\Bigg] \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\Big)\Bigg]. </math> </center> | <center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \exp\!\Bigg[\frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2}\Bigg] \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\Big)\Bigg]. </math> </center> | ||
* Step 3: Change of Coordinates | |||
Let <math>X = (x_1+x_2)/2</math> and <math>u = x_1 - x_2</math>. Then: | Let <math>X = (x_1+x_2)/2</math> and <math>u = x_1 - x_2</math>. Then: | ||
Line 71: | Line 70: | ||
<center> <math> Z_{free}^2(x,t,T) = Z_{free}(X=x,t,T/2) \, Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T), \qquad Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T) = (4 \pi T t)^{d/2}. </math> </center> | <center> <math> Z_{free}^2(x,t,T) = Z_{free}(X=x,t,T/2) \, Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T), \qquad Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T) = (4 \pi T t)^{d/2}. </math> </center> | ||
== Two-Replica Propagator == | === Two-Replica Propagator === | ||
Define the propagator: | Define the propagator: | ||
Line 91: | Line 90: | ||
* Low temperature: bound states appear. No replica-symmetry breaking (RSB), but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations show <math>\theta>0</math>. | * Low temperature: bound states appear. No replica-symmetry breaking (RSB), but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations show <math>\theta>0</math>. | ||
=Back to REM: condensation of the Gibbs measure= | |||
Thanks to the computation of <math>\overline{n(x)}</math>, we can identify an important fingerprint of the glassy phase. Let's compare the weight of the ground state against the weight of all other states: | |||
<center> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{\sum_\alpha z_\alpha}{z_{\alpha_{\min}}} = 1 + \sum_{\alpha \ne \alpha_{\min}} \frac{z_\alpha}{z_{\alpha_{\min}}} = 1 + \sum_{\alpha \ne \alpha_{\min}} e^{-\beta(E_\alpha - E_\min)} \sim 1 + \int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{d\overline{n(x)}}{dx} \, e^{-\beta x}= 1+ \int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{e^{x/b_M}}{b_M} \, e^{-\beta x} | |||
</math> | |||
</center> | |||
=== Behavior in Different Phases:=== | |||
* '''High-Temperature Phase (<math> \beta < \beta_c = 1/b_M = \sqrt{2 \log2}</math>):''' | |||
: In this regime, the total weight of the excited states dominates over the weight of the ground state. The ground state is therefore not deep enough to overcome the finite entropy contribution. As a result, the probability of sampling the same configuration twice from the Gibbs measure is exponentially small in the system size. | |||
* '''Low-Temperature Phase (<math> \beta > \beta_c =1/ b_M = \sqrt{2 \log2}</math>):''' | |||
: In this regime, the integral is finite: | |||
<center> | |||
<math> | |||
\int_0^\infty dx \, e^{ (1/b_M-\beta) x}/b_M = \frac{1}{\beta b_M-1} = \frac{\beta_c}{\beta - \beta_c} | |||
</math> | |||
</center> | |||
In this regime, the total weight of the excited states is of the same order as the weight of the ground state. Consequently, the ground state is occupied with finite probability, reminiscent of Bose–Einstein condensation. However, unlike the directed polymer in finite dimension, this condensation involves not only the ground state but also the first excited states. | |||
====Overlap Distribution and Replica Symmetry Breaking:==== | |||
The structure of states can be further characterized through the overlap between two configurations <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\gamma</math>, defined as | |||
<center> <math> q_{\alpha,\gamma} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \sigma_i^\alpha \sigma_i^\gamma, </math> </center> | |||
which takes values in the interval <math>(-1,1)</math>. The distribution <math>P(q)</math> of the overlap between two configurations sampled from the Gibbs measure distinguishes the two phases: | |||
At high temperature (<math>\beta < \beta_c</math>), the system is replica symmetric and the overlap distribution is concentrated at zero: | |||
<center> <math>P(q) = \delta(q).</math> </center> | |||
At low temperature (<math>\beta > \beta_c</math>), the system exhibits one-step replica symmetry breaking, and the overlap distribution becomes | |||
<center> <math>P(q) = \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\,\delta(q) + \Bigl(1 - \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\Bigr)\,\delta(1-q).</math> </center> | |||
== Finite Dimensional Systems== | |||
In finite dimensions, the fluctuations of the ground-state energy are characterized by an exponent <math>\theta</math>: | |||
<center> <math>\overline{\big(E_{\min} - \overline{E_{\min}}\big)^2} \sim L^{2\theta},</math> </center> | |||
where <math>L</math> is the linear size of the system and <math>N = L^D</math> is the number of degrees of freedom. | |||
When <math>\theta < 0</math>, the critical temperature vanishes with increasing system size, leading to the absence of a glass transition. This scenario occurs in many low-dimensional systems, such as the Edwards–Anderson model in two dimensions. | |||
When <math>\theta > 0</math>, one must extend the definition of this exponent to finite temperatures and consider the fluctuations of the free energy <math>F(L,\beta)</math>. Three representative cases are: | |||
* '''Directed polymer in <math>N=1,2</math>:''' | |||
The fluctuations of the ground state exhibit a positive, temperature-independent exponent <math>\theta</math>. In this situation, only the glassy phase exists, and | |||
<center><math>P(q) = \delta(1-q),</math></center> because producing an excitation with vanishing overlap with the ground state is very costly. | |||
* '''Directed polymer in <math>N=3</math>:''' | |||
The exponent <math>\theta</math> depends on the temperature: it vanishes above the glass transition and becomes strictly positive below it. Accordingly, | |||
<center><math>P(q) = \delta(1-q)</math> at low temperature, and <math>P(q) = \delta(q)</math> at high temperature.</center> | |||
* '''Directed polymer on the Cayley tree:''' | |||
The behavior is analogous to the Random Energy Model: <math>\theta = 0</math> in both phases. At high temperature, | |||
<center><math>P(q) = \delta(q),</math></center> while at low temperature the system exhibits the one-step replica symmetry breaking picture: | |||
<center> <math>P(q) = \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\,\delta(q) + \Bigl(1 - \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\Bigr)\,\delta(1-q).</math> </center> |
Latest revision as of 20:14, 16 September 2025
Directed Polymer in finite dimension
State of the Art
The directed polymer in random media belongs to the KPZ universality class. The behavior of this system is well understood in one dimension and in the mean-field case, more precisely for the directed polymer on the Cayley tree. In particular:
- In , we have and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The model is integrable through a non-standard Bethe Ansatz, and the distribution of for a given boundary condition is of the Tracy–Widom type.
- In , for the Cayley tree, an exact solution exists, predicting a freezing transition to a 1RSB phase ().
In finite dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available. Numerical simulations indicate in and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The case remains particularly intriguing.
Let's do replica!
To make progress in disordered systems, we need to analyze the moments of the partition function. The first moment provide the annealed average and the second moment tell us about the fluctuantions. In particular, the partition function is self-averaging if
In this case annealed and the quenched average coincides in the thermodynamic limit. This strict condition is sufficient, but not necessary. What is necessary is to show that for large t
,
In the following, we compute these moments via a replica calculation, considering polymers starting at and ending at .
To proceed, we only need two ingredients:
- The random potential is a Gaussian field characterized by
- Since the disorder is Gaussian, averages of exponentials can be computed using Wick’s theorem:
for any Gaussian random variable .
These two properties are all we need to carry out the replica calculation below.
First Moment
Due to the short-distance divergence of ,
Hence,
Second Moment
For the second moment we need two replicas:
- Step 1
- Step 2: Wick’s Theorem
- Step 3: Change of Coordinates
Let and . Then:
Here,
Two-Replica Propagator
Define the propagator:
By the Feynman-Kac formula:
The single-particle potential is time-independent and attractive. Long-time behavior is governed by the low-energy eigenstates.
For , the attractive potential always produces a bound state with energy . Hence, at long times:
This explosion means that the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one at all temperatures.
For , The low-energy behavior depends on :
- High temperature: the spectrum is positive and continuous. Annealed and quenched coincide, the exponent .
- Low temperature: bound states appear. No replica-symmetry breaking (RSB), but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations show .
Back to REM: condensation of the Gibbs measure
Thanks to the computation of , we can identify an important fingerprint of the glassy phase. Let's compare the weight of the ground state against the weight of all other states:
Behavior in Different Phases:
- High-Temperature Phase ():
- In this regime, the total weight of the excited states dominates over the weight of the ground state. The ground state is therefore not deep enough to overcome the finite entropy contribution. As a result, the probability of sampling the same configuration twice from the Gibbs measure is exponentially small in the system size.
- Low-Temperature Phase ():
- In this regime, the integral is finite:
In this regime, the total weight of the excited states is of the same order as the weight of the ground state. Consequently, the ground state is occupied with finite probability, reminiscent of Bose–Einstein condensation. However, unlike the directed polymer in finite dimension, this condensation involves not only the ground state but also the first excited states.
Overlap Distribution and Replica Symmetry Breaking:
The structure of states can be further characterized through the overlap between two configurations and , defined as
which takes values in the interval . The distribution of the overlap between two configurations sampled from the Gibbs measure distinguishes the two phases:
At high temperature (), the system is replica symmetric and the overlap distribution is concentrated at zero:
At low temperature (), the system exhibits one-step replica symmetry breaking, and the overlap distribution becomes
Finite Dimensional Systems
In finite dimensions, the fluctuations of the ground-state energy are characterized by an exponent :
where is the linear size of the system and is the number of degrees of freedom.
When , the critical temperature vanishes with increasing system size, leading to the absence of a glass transition. This scenario occurs in many low-dimensional systems, such as the Edwards–Anderson model in two dimensions.
When , one must extend the definition of this exponent to finite temperatures and consider the fluctuations of the free energy . Three representative cases are:
- Directed polymer in :
The fluctuations of the ground state exhibit a positive, temperature-independent exponent . In this situation, only the glassy phase exists, and
because producing an excitation with vanishing overlap with the ground state is very costly.
- Directed polymer in :
The exponent depends on the temperature: it vanishes above the glass transition and becomes strictly positive below it. Accordingly,
- Directed polymer on the Cayley tree:
The behavior is analogous to the Random Energy Model: in both phases. At high temperature,
while at low temperature the system exhibits the one-step replica symmetry breaking picture: