L-4: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Directed Polymer in finite dimension =
== State of the Art ==


The directed polymer in random media belongs to the KPZ universality class.


The behavior of this system is well understood in one transverse dimension and in the mean-field case, more precisely for the directed polymer on the Cayley tree. In particular:


= Directed Polymer in finite dimension =
* In <math>N=1</math>, one has <math>\theta=1/3</math> and a glassy regime present at all temperatures.
 
The model is integrable through a non-standard Bethe Ansatz, and the distribution of <math>E_{\min}</math> for a given boundary condition is of the Tracy–Widom type.
== State of the Art ==


The directed polymer in random media belongs to the KPZ universality class. The behavior of this system is well understood in one dimension and in the mean-field case, more precisely for the directed polymer on the Cayley tree. In particular:
* In <math>N=\infty</math>, corresponding to the Cayley tree, an exact solution exists, predicting a freezing transition to a one-step replica symmetry breaking phase (<math>\theta=0</math>).


* In <math>d=1</math>, we have <math>\theta=1/3</math> and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The model is integrable through a non-standard Bethe Ansatz, and the distribution of <math>E_{\min}</math> for a given boundary condition is of the Tracy–Widom type.
In finite transverse dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available.
Numerical simulations indicate <math>\theta>0</math> in <math>N=2</math>, with a glassy regime present at all temperatures.
The case <math>N>2</math> remains particularly intriguing.


* In <math>d=\infty</math>, for the Cayley tree, an exact solution exists, predicting a freezing transition to a 1RSB phase (<math>\theta=0</math>).
== Let's do replica! ==


In finite dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available. Numerical simulations indicate <math>\theta > 0</math> in <math>d=2</math> and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The case <math>d > 2</math> remains particularly intriguing.
To make progress in disordered systems, we analyze the moments of the partition function.
The first moment provides the annealed average, while the second moment contains information about fluctuations.
In particular, the partition function is self-averaging if
<math display="block">
\frac{\overline{Z(x,t)^2}}{(\overline{Z(x,t)})^2} = 1 .
</math>


In this case, the annealed and quenched averages coincide in the thermodynamic limit.
This condition is sufficient but not necessary. What is necessary is to show that for large <math>t</math>
<math display="block">
\frac{\overline{Z(x,t)^2}}{(\overline{Z(x,t)})^2} < \text{const} .
</math>


==Let's do replica!==
To make progress  in disordered systems, we need to analyze the moments of the partition function.  The first moment provide the annealed average and the second moment tell us about the fluctuantions. In particular, the partition function is self-averaging  if
<center> 
<math> 
\frac{\overline{Z(x,t)^2}}{ (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2}=1  \, .
</math> 
</center> 
In this case annealed and the quenched average coincides in the thermodynamic limit. This strict  condition is sufficient, but not necessary. What is necessary is to show that  for large ''t''
<center> 
<math> 
\frac{\overline{Z(x,t)^2}}{ (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2} < \text{const} 
</math>, 
</center> 
In the following, we compute these moments via a replica calculation, considering polymers starting at <math>0</math> and ending at <math>x</math>.
In the following, we compute these moments via a replica calculation, considering polymers starting at <math>0</math> and ending at <math>x</math>.


Line 33: Line 35:


* The random potential <math>V(x,\tau)</math> is a Gaussian field characterized by
* The random potential <math>V(x,\tau)</math> is a Gaussian field characterized by
<center> <math> \overline{V(x,\tau)} = 0, \qquad \overline{V(x,\tau) V(x',\tau')} = D \, \delta^d(x-x') \, \delta(\tau - \tau'). </math> </center>
<math display="block">
\overline{V(x,\tau)} = 0, \qquad
\overline{V(x,\tau)V(x',\tau')} =
D\,\delta^N(x-x')\,\delta(\tau-\tau') .
</math>
 
* Since the disorder is Gaussian, averages of exponentials can be computed using Wick’s theorem:
* Since the disorder is Gaussian, averages of exponentials can be computed using Wick’s theorem:
<center> <math> \overline{\exp(W)} = \exp\!\Big[\overline{W} + \frac{1}{2}\big(\overline{W^2} - \overline{W}^2\big)\Big], </math> </center>
<math display="block">
\overline{\exp(W)} =
\exp\!\Big[\overline{W} + \frac{1}{2}\big(\overline{W^2}-(\overline{W})^2\big)\Big] ,
</math>
for any Gaussian random variable <math>W</math>.
for any Gaussian random variable <math>W</math>.


These two properties are all we need to carry out the replica calculation below.
These two properties are all we need to carry out the replica calculation below.


==First Moment==
== First Moment ==


<math display="block">
\overline{Z(x,t)} =
\int_{x(0)=0}^{x(t)=x} \mathcal{D}x(\tau)\,
\exp\Big[-\frac{1}{T}\int_0^t d\tau \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\tau x)^2\Big]\,
\overline{\exp\Big[-\frac{1}{T}\int_0^t d\tau\,V(x(\tau),\tau)\Big]} .
</math>


<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)} = \int_{x(0)=0}^{x(t)=x} \mathcal{D}x(\tau) \exp\Big[-\frac{1}{T}\int_0^t d\tau \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\tau x)^2\Big] \overline{\exp\Big[-\frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x(\tau),\tau)\Big]} </math> </center>
Due to the short-distance divergence of <math>\delta^N(0)</math>,
<math display="block">
T^2 \overline{W^2}
= \int d\tau_1 d\tau_2\,
\overline{V(x,\tau_1)V(x,\tau_2)}
= D\,t\,\delta_0 .
</math>


Due to the short-distance divergence of <math>\delta^d(0)</math>,
<center> <math> T^2 \overline{W^2} = \int d\tau_1 d\tau_2 \overline{V(x,\tau_1)V(x,\tau_2)} = D t \delta_0. </math> </center>
Hence,
Hence,
<math display="block">
\overline{Z(x,t)}
= \frac{1}{(2\pi t T)^{N/2}}
\exp\Big[-\frac{x^2}{2tT}\Big]
\exp\Big[\frac{D t \delta_0}{2T^2}\Big]
= Z_{\text{free}}(x,t,T)\,
\exp\Big[\frac{D t \delta_0}{2T^2}\Big] .
</math>


<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)} = \frac{1}{(2\pi t T)^{d/2}} \exp\Big[-\frac{x^2}{2 t T}\Big] \exp\Big[\frac{D t \delta_0}{2 T^2}\Big] = Z_{free}(x,t,T)  \exp\Big[\frac{D t \delta_0}{2 T^2}\Big].  </math> </center>
== Second Moment ==
==Second Moment==
For the second moment we need two replicas:


* Step 1
For the second moment we need two replicas.
<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2\Big)\Bigg] \; \overline{\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_1(\tau),\tau) - \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d\tau V(x_2(\tau),\tau)\Bigg]}. </math> </center>


* Step 2: Wick’s Theorem
* Step 1:
<math display="block">
\overline{Z(x,t)^2}
= \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2\,
\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau
\Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2\Big)\Bigg]\,
\overline{\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{T}\int_0^t d\tau
\big(V(x_1(\tau),\tau)+V(x_2(\tau),\tau)\big)\Bigg]} .
</math>


<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = \exp\!\Bigg[\frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2}\Bigg] \int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2 \exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau \Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\Big)\Bigg]. </math> </center>
* Step 2: Wick’s theorem
<math display="block">
\overline{Z(x,t)^2}
= \exp\!\Big[\frac{D t \delta_0}{T^2}\Big]
\int \mathcal{D}x_1 \int \mathcal{D}x_2\,
\exp\!\Bigg[-\frac{1}{2T}\int_0^t d\tau
\Big((\partial_\tau x_1)^2 + (\partial_\tau x_2)^2
- \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^N[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\Big)\Bigg] .
</math>


* Step 3: Change of Coordinates
* Step 3: Change of coordinates


Let <math>X = (x_1+x_2)/2</math> and <math>u = x_1 - x_2</math>. Then:
Let <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2</math> and <math>u=x_1-x_2</math>. Then
 
<math display="block">
<center> <math> \overline{Z(x,t)^2} = (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2 \frac{\displaystyle \int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} \mathcal{D}u \exp\!\Bigg[-\int_0^t d\tau \frac{1}{4T} (\partial_\tau u)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\Bigg]} {Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T)}. </math> </center>
\overline{Z(x,t)^2}
= (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2
\frac{\displaystyle
\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} \mathcal{D}u\,
\exp\!\Big[-\int_0^t d\tau
\Big(\frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2
+ \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^N[u(\tau)]\Big)\Big]}
{Z_{\text{free}}(u=0,t,2T)} .
</math>


Here,
Here,
<math display="block">
Z_{\text{free}}^2(x,t,T)
= Z_{\text{free}}(X=x,t,T/2)\,
Z_{\text{free}}(u=0,t,2T),
\qquad
Z_{\text{free}}(u=0,t,2T) = (4\pi T t)^{-N/2}.
</math>


<center> <math> Z_{free}^2(x,t,T) = Z_{free}(X=x,t,T/2) \, Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T), \qquad Z_{free}(u=0,t,2T) = (4 \pi T t)^{d/2}. </math> </center>
=== Two-replica propagator ===


=== Two-Replica Propagator ===
Define the propagator
<math display="block">
W(0,t) =
\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} \mathcal{D}u\,
\exp\Big[-\int_0^t d\tau
\Big(\frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2
+ \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^N[u(\tau)]\Big)\Big] .
</math>


Define the propagator:
By the Feynman–Kac formula,
<math display="block">
\partial_t W(x,t) = -\hat H W(x,t),
\qquad
\hat H = -T\nabla^2 - \frac{D}{T^2}\delta^N[u] .
</math>


<center> <math> W(0,t) = \int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} \mathcal{D}u \exp\Big[-\int_0^t d\tau \frac{1}{4T} (\partial_\tau u)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\Big]. </math> </center>
For <math>N \le 2</math>, the attractive potential always produces a bound state with energy <math>E_0<0</math>.
Hence, at long times
<math display="block">
W(x,t) \sim e^{|E_0|t} .
</math>
This divergence implies that the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one at all temperatures.


By the Feynman-Kac formula:
For <math>N>2</math>, the low-energy behavior depends on <math>D/T^2</math>:


<center> <math> \partial_t W(x,t) = -\hat H W(x,t), \quad \hat H = -T \nabla^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u]. </math> </center>
* At high temperature, the spectrum is positive and continuous. Annealed and quenched averages coincide, and <math>\theta=0</math>.
The single-particle potential is time-independent and attractive. Long-time behavior is governed by the low-energy eigenstates.
* At low temperature, bound states appear. There is no replica symmetry breaking, but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations indicate <math>\theta>0</math>.


= Overlap Distribution and Replica Symmetry Breaking =


For <math>d \le 2</math>, the attractive potential always produces a bound state with energy <math>E_0<0</math>. Hence, at long times:
<center> <math> W(x,t) \sim e^{|E_0| t}  </math> </center>
This explosion means that the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one at all temperatures.
For <math>d > 2</math>,  The low-energy behavior depends on <math>D/T^2</math>:
* High temperature: the spectrum is positive and continuous. Annealed and quenched coincide, the exponent <math>\theta=0</math>.
* Low temperature: bound states appear.  No replica-symmetry breaking (RSB), but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations show <math>\theta>0</math>.
=Back to REM: condensation of the Gibbs measure=
Thanks to the computation of <math>\overline{n(x)}</math>, we can identify an important fingerprint of the glassy phase.  Let's compare the weight of the ground state against the weight of all other states:
<center> 
<math>
\frac{\sum_\alpha z_\alpha}{z_{\alpha_{\min}}} = 1 + \sum_{\alpha \ne \alpha_{\min}} \frac{z_\alpha}{z_{\alpha_{\min}}} = 1 + \sum_{\alpha \ne \alpha_{\min}} e^{-\beta(E_\alpha - E_\min)} \sim 1 + \int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{d\overline{n(x)}}{dx} \, e^{-\beta x}= 1+ \int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{e^{x/b_M}}{b_M} \, e^{-\beta x}
</math>
</center>
=== Behavior in Different Phases:===
* '''High-Temperature Phase (<math> \beta <  \beta_c = 1/b_M = \sqrt{2 \log2}</math>):''' 
: In this regime, the total weight of the excited states dominates over the weight of the ground state. The ground state is therefore not deep enough to overcome the finite entropy contribution. As a result, the probability of sampling the same configuration twice from the Gibbs measure is exponentially small in  'N'.
* '''Low-Temperature Phase (<math> \beta > \beta_c =1/ b_M = \sqrt{2 \log2}</math>):''' 
: In this regime, the integral is finite: 
<center> 
<math>
\int_0^\infty dx \, e^{ (1/b_M-\beta) x}/b_M = \frac{1}{\beta b_M-1}  = \frac{\beta_c}{\beta - \beta_c}
</math> 
</center> 
In this regime, the total weight of the excited states is of the same order as the weight of the ground state. Consequently, the ground state is occupied with finite probability, reminiscent of Bose–Einstein condensation. However, unlike the directed polymer in finite dimension, this condensation involves not only the ground state but also the first excited states.
====Overlap Distribution and Replica Symmetry Breaking:====
The structure of states can be further characterized through the overlap between two configurations <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\gamma</math>, defined as
The structure of states can be further characterized through the overlap between two configurations <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\gamma</math>, defined as
<math display="block">
q_{\alpha,\gamma} = \frac{1}{L^d} \sum_{i=1}^{L^d} \sigma_i^\alpha \sigma_i^\gamma .
</math>


<center> <math> q_{\alpha,\gamma} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \sigma_i^\alpha \sigma_i^\gamma, </math> </center>
For spin glasses, the overlap takes values in the interval <math>(-1,1)</math>.
This definition can be naturally extended to directed polymers, where the overlap is identified with the fraction of monomers shared by two polymer configurations.


which takes values in the interval <math>(-1,1)</math>. The distribution <math>P(q)</math> of the overlap between two configurations sampled from the Gibbs measure distinguishes the two phases:
In systems exhibiting '''one-step replica symmetry breaking (1RSB)''', the distribution <math>P(q)</math> of the overlap between two configurations sampled from the Gibbs measure sharply distinguishes the two phases.


At high temperature (<math>\beta < \beta_c</math>), the system is replica symmetric and the overlap distribution is concentrated at zero:
At high temperature (<math>\beta < \beta_c</math>), the system is replica symmetric and the overlap distribution is concentrated at zero:
 
<math display="block">
<center> <math>P(q) = \delta(q).</math> </center>
P(q) = \delta(q) .
</math>


At low temperature (<math>\beta > \beta_c</math>), the system exhibits one-step replica symmetry breaking, and the overlap distribution becomes
At low temperature (<math>\beta > \beta_c</math>), the system exhibits one-step replica symmetry breaking, and the overlap distribution becomes
<math display="block">
P(q) = \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\,\delta(q) + \Bigl(1 - \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\Bigr)\,\delta(1-q) .
</math>


<center> <math>P(q) = \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\,\delta(q) + \Bigl(1 - \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\Bigr)\,\delta(1-q).</math> </center>
This picture is realized, for instance, in the Random Energy Model and on the Cayley tree.
 
==More general REM and systems in Finite dimensions==
 
In random energy models with i.i.d. random variables, the distribution <math>p(E)</math> determines the dependence of <math>a_M</math> and <math>b_M</math> on ''M'', and consequently their scaling with ''N'', the number of degrees of freedom. It is insightful to consider a more general case where an exponent <math>\omega</math> describes the fluctuations of the ground state energy:
<center> <math>\overline{\left(E_{\min} - \overline{E_{\min}}\right)^2} \sim b_M^2 \propto N^{2\omega}</math> </center>
 
Three distinct scenarios emerge depending on the sign of <math>\omega</math>:


* For <math>\omega < 0</math>: The freezing temperature vanishes with increasing system size, leading to the absence of a freezing transition. This scenario occurs in many low-dimensional systems, such as the Edwards-Anderson model in two dimensions.
== Finite-dimensional systems ==


* For <math>\omega = 0</math>: A freezing transition is guaranteed. For the Random Energy Model discussed earlier, <math>T_f = 1/\sqrt{2 \log 2}</math>. An important feature of this transition, as will be explored in the next section, is that condensation does not occur solely in the ground state but also involves a large (albeit not extensive) number of low-energy excitations.
In finite dimensions, the nature of the low-temperature phase is controlled by the fluctuations of the ground-state energy, characterized by an exponent <math>\theta</math>:
<math display="block">
\overline{\big(E_{\min} - \overline{E_{\min}}\big)^2} \sim L^{2\theta} ,
</math>
where <math>L</math> is the linear size of the system and <math>L^d</math> the number of degrees of freedom.


* For <math>\omega > 0</math>: The freezing temperature grows with the system size, resulting in only the glassy phase. The system condenses entirely into the ground state since the excited states are characterized by prohibitively high energies. This scenario, while less intricate than the <math>\omega = 0</math> case, corresponds to a glassy phase with a single deep ground state.
When <math>\theta < 0</math>, the critical temperature vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, implying the absence of a glass transition.
This is the case, for instance, of the Edwards–Anderson spin glass in two dimensions.


The extent to which these scenarios persist in real systems in finite dimensions remains an open question. In these systems, such as the directed polymers, the fluctuations of the ground state energy are characterized by an exponent <math>\theta</math>:
When <math>\theta > 0</math>, one must consider the fluctuations of the free energy <math>F(L,\beta)</math> at finite temperature.
<center> <math>\overline{\left(E_{\min} - \overline{E_{\min}}\right)^2} \sim L^{2\theta}</math> </center>
Several representative cases can then be distinguished.


where <math>L</math> is the linear size of the system and <math>N = L^D</math> is the number of degrees of freedom.
* '''Directed polymer in <math>N=1,2</math>:'''
The fluctuations of the ground-state energy are governed by a positive, temperature-independent exponent <math>\theta</math>.
The system is glassy at all temperatures, but the glassy phase is dominated by a '''single ground state'''.
As a consequence,
<math display="block">
P(q) = \delta(1-q) ,
</math>
since excitations with vanishing overlap with the ground state are energetically prohibitive.


At finite temperatures, an analogous exponent is defined by studying the fluctuations of the free energy, <math>F = E - T S</math>. For the directed polymer in low dimwnsion the fluctuations of the ground state exhibit a positive and temperature-independent <math>\theta</math>. In such cases, only the glassy phase exists, aligning with the <math>\omega > 0</math> scenario in REMs.
* '''Directed polymer in <math>N=3</math>:'''
The exponent <math>\theta</math> depends on temperature: it vanishes above the glass transition and becomes strictly positive below it.
Accordingly,
<math display="block">
P(q) = \delta(q) .
</math>
at high temperature, while
<math display="block">
P(q) = \delta(1-q) .
</math>
at low temperature.
Even in the glassy phase, the system is controlled by a unique ground state, and no one-step replica symmetry breaking occurs.


On the other hand, for the directed polymer in high dimension, <math>\theta</math> is positive at low temperatures but vanishes at high temperatures. This behavior defines a glass transition mechanism entirely distinct from those observed in mean-field models.
* '''Directed polymer on the Cayley tree:'''
The behavior is analogous to that of the Random Energy Model.
The exponent <math>\theta = 0</math> in both phases, and the low-temperature phase is characterized by one-step replica symmetry breaking.
At high temperature,
<math display="block">
P(q) = \delta(q) ,
</math>
while at low temperature
<math display="block">
P(q) = \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\,\delta(q) + \Bigl(1 - \tfrac{\beta_c}{\beta}\Bigr)\,\delta(1-q) .
</math>

Latest revision as of 22:05, 1 March 2026

Directed Polymer in finite dimension

State of the Art

The directed polymer in random media belongs to the KPZ universality class.

The behavior of this system is well understood in one transverse dimension and in the mean-field case, more precisely for the directed polymer on the Cayley tree. In particular:

  • In N=1, one has θ=1/3 and a glassy regime present at all temperatures.

The model is integrable through a non-standard Bethe Ansatz, and the distribution of Emin for a given boundary condition is of the Tracy–Widom type.

  • In N=, corresponding to the Cayley tree, an exact solution exists, predicting a freezing transition to a one-step replica symmetry breaking phase (θ=0).

In finite transverse dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available. Numerical simulations indicate θ>0 in N=2, with a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The case N>2 remains particularly intriguing.

Let's do replica!

To make progress in disordered systems, we analyze the moments of the partition function. The first moment provides the annealed average, while the second moment contains information about fluctuations. In particular, the partition function is self-averaging if Z(x,t)2(Z(x,t))2=1.

In this case, the annealed and quenched averages coincide in the thermodynamic limit. This condition is sufficient but not necessary. What is necessary is to show that for large t Z(x,t)2(Z(x,t))2<const.

In the following, we compute these moments via a replica calculation, considering polymers starting at 0 and ending at x.

To proceed, we only need two ingredients:

  • The random potential V(x,τ) is a Gaussian field characterized by

V(x,τ)=0,V(x,τ)V(x,τ)=DδN(xx)δ(ττ).

  • Since the disorder is Gaussian, averages of exponentials can be computed using Wick’s theorem:

exp(W)=exp[W+12(W2(W)2)], for any Gaussian random variable W.

These two properties are all we need to carry out the replica calculation below.

First Moment

Z(x,t)=x(0)=0x(t)=x𝒟x(τ)exp[1T0tdτ12(τx)2]exp[1T0tdτV(x(τ),τ)].

Due to the short-distance divergence of δN(0), T2W2=dτ1dτ2V(x,τ1)V(x,τ2)=Dtδ0.

Hence, Z(x,t)=1(2πtT)N/2exp[x22tT]exp[Dtδ02T2]=Zfree(x,t,T)exp[Dtδ02T2].

Second Moment

For the second moment we need two replicas.

  • Step 1:

Z(x,t)2=𝒟x1𝒟x2exp[12T0tdτ((τx1)2+(τx2)2)]exp[1T0tdτ(V(x1(τ),τ)+V(x2(τ),τ))].

  • Step 2: Wick’s theorem

Z(x,t)2=exp[Dtδ0T2]𝒟x1𝒟x2exp[12T0tdτ((τx1)2+(τx2)2DT2δN[x1(τ)x2(τ)])].

  • Step 3: Change of coordinates

Let X=(x1+x2)/2 and u=x1x2. Then Z(x,t)2=(Z(x,t))2u(0)=0u(t)=0𝒟uexp[0tdτ(14T(τu)2+DT2δN[u(τ)])]Zfree(u=0,t,2T).

Here, Zfree2(x,t,T)=Zfree(X=x,t,T/2)Zfree(u=0,t,2T),Zfree(u=0,t,2T)=(4πTt)N/2.

Two-replica propagator

Define the propagator W(0,t)=u(0)=0u(t)=0𝒟uexp[0tdτ(14T(τu)2+DT2δN[u(τ)])].

By the Feynman–Kac formula, tW(x,t)=H^W(x,t),H^=T2DT2δN[u].

For N2, the attractive potential always produces a bound state with energy E0<0. Hence, at long times W(x,t)e|E0|t. This divergence implies that the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one at all temperatures.

For N>2, the low-energy behavior depends on D/T2:

  • At high temperature, the spectrum is positive and continuous. Annealed and quenched averages coincide, and θ=0.
  • At low temperature, bound states appear. There is no replica symmetry breaking, but the quenched free energy is smaller than the annealed one. Numerical simulations indicate θ>0.

Overlap Distribution and Replica Symmetry Breaking

The structure of states can be further characterized through the overlap between two configurations α and γ, defined as qα,γ=1Ldi=1Ldσiασiγ.

For spin glasses, the overlap takes values in the interval (1,1). This definition can be naturally extended to directed polymers, where the overlap is identified with the fraction of monomers shared by two polymer configurations.

In systems exhibiting one-step replica symmetry breaking (1RSB), the distribution P(q) of the overlap between two configurations sampled from the Gibbs measure sharply distinguishes the two phases.

At high temperature (β<βc), the system is replica symmetric and the overlap distribution is concentrated at zero: P(q)=δ(q).

At low temperature (β>βc), the system exhibits one-step replica symmetry breaking, and the overlap distribution becomes P(q)=βcβδ(q)+(1βcβ)δ(1q).

This picture is realized, for instance, in the Random Energy Model and on the Cayley tree.

Finite-dimensional systems

In finite dimensions, the nature of the low-temperature phase is controlled by the fluctuations of the ground-state energy, characterized by an exponent θ: (EminEmin)2L2θ, where L is the linear size of the system and Ld the number of degrees of freedom.

When θ<0, the critical temperature vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, implying the absence of a glass transition. This is the case, for instance, of the Edwards–Anderson spin glass in two dimensions.

When θ>0, one must consider the fluctuations of the free energy F(L,β) at finite temperature. Several representative cases can then be distinguished.

  • Directed polymer in N=1,2:

The fluctuations of the ground-state energy are governed by a positive, temperature-independent exponent θ. The system is glassy at all temperatures, but the glassy phase is dominated by a single ground state. As a consequence, P(q)=δ(1q), since excitations with vanishing overlap with the ground state are energetically prohibitive.

  • Directed polymer in N=3:

The exponent θ depends on temperature: it vanishes above the glass transition and becomes strictly positive below it. Accordingly, P(q)=δ(q). at high temperature, while P(q)=δ(1q). at low temperature. Even in the glassy phase, the system is controlled by a unique ground state, and no one-step replica symmetry breaking occurs.

  • Directed polymer on the Cayley tree:

The behavior is analogous to that of the Random Energy Model. The exponent θ=0 in both phases, and the low-temperature phase is characterized by one-step replica symmetry breaking. At high temperature, P(q)=δ(q), while at low temperature P(q)=βcβδ(q)+(1βcβ)δ(1q).