L-4: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
* Step 1:
* Step 1:
<center> <math>
<center> <math>
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{T^2}  \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 ]+ \frac{D}{T^2} \delta[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right]
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{T^2}  \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 ]+ \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right]
</math></center>
</math></center>
Now you can change coordinate <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math> and get:
Now you can change coordinate <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math> and get:
<center> <math>
<center> <math>
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2} = (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2+ \frac{D}{T^2} \delta[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]}
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2} = (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2+ \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]}
</math></center>
</math></center>
* Step 2: Hence, the quantity <math>
* Step 2: Hence, the quantity <math>
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}/ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2</math> can be computed from the spectrum of the following Hamiltonian
\overline{Z[x_t,t]^2}/ (\overline{Z[x_t,t]})^2</math> can be computed from the spectrum of the following Hamiltonian
<center> <math>
<center> <math>
H= 2 T \nabla^2 + \frac{D}{T^2} \delta[u]
H= -2 T \nabla^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u]
</math></center>
</math></center>

Revision as of 11:35, 11 February 2024

Goal : final lecture on KPZ and directed polymers at finite dimension. We will show that for d>2 a "glass transition" takes place.


KPZ : from d=1 to the Cayley tree

We know a lot about KPZ, but still we have much to understand:

  • In d=1 we found θ=1/3 and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. Moreover, the stationary solution tell us that Emin[x] is a Brownian motion in x. However this solution does not identify the actual distribution of Emin for a given x. In particular we have no idea from where Tracy Widom comes from.
  • In d>1 the exponents are not known. There is an exact solution for the Cayley tree (infinite dimension) that predicts a freezing transition to an 1RSB phase (θ=0).

Let's do replica!

To make progress in disordered systems we have to go through the moments of the partition function. For simplicity we consider polymers starting in x0=0 and ending in xt. We recall that

  • V(x,τ) is a Gaussian field with
V(x,τ)‾=0,V(x,τ)V(x′,τ′)‾=Dδd(x−x′)δ(τ−τ′)
  • From the Wick theorem, for a generic Gaussian W field we have
exp⁡(W)‾=exp⁡[W‾+12(W2‾−W‾2)]

The first moment of the partition function is

Zt[xt,t]‾=∫x(0)=0x(t)=xt𝒟x1exp⁡[−1T∫0tdτ12(∂τx)2]exp⁡[−1T∫dτV(x,τ)]‾

Note that the term T2W2‾=∫dτ1dτ2V(x,τ1)V(x,τ2)‾=Dtδ0 has a short distance divergence due to the delta-function. Hence we can write:

Zt[x1]‾=1(2πtT)d/2exp⁡[−d2xt2tT]exp⁡[Dtδ02T2]

Exercise L4-A: the second moment

  • Step 1:
Z[xt,t]2‾=exp⁡[Dtδ0T2]∫𝒟x1∫𝒟x2exp⁡[−∫0tdτ12T[(∂τx1)2+(∂τx2)2]+DT2δd[x1(τ)−x2(τ)]]

Now you can change coordinate X=(x1+x2)/2;u=x1−x2 and get:

Z[xt,t]2‾=(Z[xt,t]‾)2∫u(0)=0u(t)=0𝒟uexp⁡[−∫0tdτ14T(∂τu)2+DT2δd[u(τ)]]∫u(0)=0u(t)=0𝒟uexp⁡[−∫0tdτ14T(∂τu)2]
  • Step 2: Hence, the quantity Z[xt,t]2‾/(Z[xt,t]‾)2 can be computed from the spectrum of the following Hamiltonian
H=−2T∇2−DT2δd[u]