L-5: Difference between revisions
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
v_i(t) =\partial_t h_i(t)= \frac12 (h_{i+1}(t)+h_{i-1}(t) -2 h_i(t)) + f +F_i(h_i(t)), | v_i(t) =\partial_t h_i(t)= \frac12 (h_{i+1}(t)+h_{i-1}(t) -2 h_i(t)) + f +F_i(h_i(t)), | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
To study avalanches below threshold, one as to trigger them at constant force, which is not very convenient. It is useful to replace the external force with a parabolic potential <math> \frac{m^2}{2}(w-h_i(t))^2</math>, here <math>m^2</math> is the spring constant, try to bring each block at the equilibrium position <math>w</math>. The velocity of each block becomes | To study avalanches below threshold, one as to trigger them at constant force, which is not very convenient. It is useful to replace the external force with a parabolic potential <math> \frac{m^2}{2}(w-h_i(t))^2</math>, here <math>m^2</math> is the spring constant, try to bring each block at the equilibrium position <math>w</math>. The velocity of each block becomes | ||
Line 97: | Line 98: | ||
v_i(t) =\partial_t h_i(t)= h_{i+1}(t)+h_{i-1}(t) -2 h_i(t) + m^2(w-h_i(t)) +F_i(h_i(t)), | v_i(t) =\partial_t h_i(t)= h_{i+1}(t)+h_{i-1}(t) -2 h_i(t) + m^2(w-h_i(t)) +F_i(h_i(t)), | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
Note that in a stable configuration, where all the velocity are zero, the force acting on the line per unit length is <math> m^2(w-h_{CM}(t))</math> | Note that in a stable configuration, where all the velocity are zero, the force acting on the line per unit length is <math> m^2(w-h_{CM}(t))</math>. Increasing <math> w </math> the force slowly increases if <math> h_{CM} </math> doest not move. When an avalanche occurs the force decreses. | ||
Finally, the most important step is to introduce the narrow-well approximation for the disorder. We imagine that along <math>h_i</math> impurities act as pinning center that trap the block around their position until a local threshold <math> \sigma_i^{th}</math> is reached. In this limit the local velocities are zero when the block is trapped and quickly move to the next impurity once the threshold is overcome. The obteained cellular automata can be described by the following algorithm: | |||
* <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w</math> each point of the interface is pulled with a slowly increasing force or stress: | * <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w</math> each point of the interface is pulled with a slowly increasing force or stress: | ||
<center><math> \sigma_i= \frac 1 2 (h_{i+1}+h_{i-1} -2 h_i) + m^2(w-h_i) </math></center>. | <center><math> \sigma_i= \frac 1 2 (h_{i+1}+h_{i-1} -2 h_i) + m^2(w-h_i) </math></center>. | ||
* <Strong> Instability:</Strong> An instability occurs when <math> \sigma_i </math> reaches | * <Strong> Instability:</Strong> An instability occurs when <math> \sigma_i </math> reaches its <math> \sigma_i^{th}</math>. Hence the point moves to the next well | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\begin{cases} | \begin{cases} | ||
Line 113: | Line 115: | ||
Note that <math> \Delta</math> is a positive random variable drwan from <math> g(\Delta)</math>. | Note that <math> \Delta</math> is a positive random variable drwan from <math> g(\Delta)</math>. | ||
* <Strong> Avalanche:</Strong> The two neighbours can be unstable... An avalanche can start... | * <Strong> Avalanche:</Strong> The two neighbours can be unstable... An avalanche can start... | ||
Revision as of 23:29, 28 February 2024
Goal : This is the first lecture about the dynamics of a disordered system. We will see that different systems display pinning until a critical threshold. We will revisit Larkin arguments and discuss the spectrum of excitation of the instabilities.
Pinning and depininng of a disordered material
In the first lectures we saw that a disorder system can be trapped in deep energy states and form a glass. Today we will see that it can be also pinned and resist external deformation. Indeed disorder is at the origin of a complex energy landscape characterized by many minima (more or less deep), maxima and saddle points. An external force tilts this multidimensional landscape in a direction, but local minima survives until a finite threshold that unveils spectacular critical dynamics.
Experiments
We will discuss two examples of transition induced by pinning:
- The depinning transition: interfaces pinned by impurities are ubiquitous and range from magnetic domain walls to crack fronts, from dislocations in crystals or vortices in superconductors. Above a critical force, interfaces depin, their motion is intermittent and a Barkhausen noise is detected.
- The yielding transition: Everyday amorphous materials such as mayonnaise, toothpaste or foams display a behaviour intermediate between solid and liquid. They deform at small stress (as a solid) and flow at large stress (as a liquid). In between we observe intermittent plastic events.
Equation of motion
We set to zero the temperature and consider the dynamics in the overdamped regime, where . In presence of an external force the equation of motion of the interface is
The disorder force is a stochastic function:
There are usually two kind of disorder: (i) Random Bond (RB) if is short range correlated. Hence, the area below is zero, (ii) Random field if is a Brownian motion along .Hence, is short range corraleted.
- The velocity - force characteristics
- Existence of a unique critical force : no-passing rule.
- Large force behaviour shows that in the moving phase the long distance properties of the interface are described by Edwards-Wilkinson.
Scaling behaviour of the depinning transition
- The order parameter of the transition is the velocity of the center of mass of the interface. It is vanishing as
- Two point correlation function:
- The interface is rough at
- The motion is intermittent with avalanches even below . Their size and duration is scale free up to a cut-off:
scaling arguemnts
Exponent | Observable | Mean field | d=1 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
0 | |||
1/2 | |||
1 | |||
3/2 |
Cellular Automata
We introduce a discrete version of the continuous equation of motion of the interface. These cellular automata share the same universality class of the original model, are very convenient for numerical studies and can be solved in the mean field limit. For simplicity we discuss the case.
The first step is the disretization along the direction. The line is now a collection of blocks connected by springs. The spring constant is set equal to one. Hence the velocity of each block is
To study avalanches below threshold, one as to trigger them at constant force, which is not very convenient. It is useful to replace the external force with a parabolic potential , here is the spring constant, try to bring each block at the equilibrium position . The velocity of each block becomes
Note that in a stable configuration, where all the velocity are zero, the force acting on the line per unit length is . Increasing the force slowly increases if doest not move. When an avalanche occurs the force decreses.
Finally, the most important step is to introduce the narrow-well approximation for the disorder. We imagine that along impurities act as pinning center that trap the block around their position until a local threshold is reached. In this limit the local velocities are zero when the block is trapped and quickly move to the next impurity once the threshold is overcome. The obteained cellular automata can be described by the following algorithm:
- Drive: Increasing each point of the interface is pulled with a slowly increasing force or stress:
.
- Instability: An instability occurs when reaches its . Hence the point moves to the next well
Note that is a positive random variable drwan from .
- Avalanche: The two neighbours can be unstable... An avalanche can start...