H 1: Difference between revisions
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Show that the appropriate scaling form is obtained by introducing <math>a_L = 0</math> and <math>b_L = F_c^{\mathrm{typ}}</math>, and defining the rescaled variable <center><math> z = \frac{x-a_L}{b_L}.</math></center> | Show that the appropriate scaling form is obtained by introducing <math>a_L = 0</math> and <math>b_L = F_c^{\mathrm{typ}}</math>, and defining the rescaled variable <center><math> z = \frac{x-a_L}{b_L}.</math></center> | ||
Determine the limiting, <math>L</math>-independent distribution of <math>z</math>, and identify the corresponding | Determine the limiting, <math>L</math>-independent distribution of <math>z</math>, and identify the corresponding universal distribution. | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 18 January 2026
Exercises: Extreme Value Statistics
Exercise 1: Gaussian tails and Gumbel scaling
We are interested in the asymptotic behavior of the cumulative distribution in the left tail , since the minimum is controlled by the regime where .
Starting from the Gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance , we write the cumulative as
Using integration by parts (or equivalently the change of variable ), one finds
For , the second term is subleading, and the cumulative admits the asymptotic expansion
This result can be written in the form
which is the expression used in the course to derive the scaling form of the minimum.
Using Gaussian variables, we analyzed a situation where the minimum is controlled
by the far left tail of the distribution.
As a consequence, the natural centering constant was the typical minimum
.
We now consider a qualitatively different case, where the random variables are bounded from below. In this situation, the minimum is controlled by the behavior of the distribution close to the edge of its support.
This will lead to a different choice of scaling parameters: the centering constant is fixed by the lower bound of the support, while the scale of fluctuations is set by the typical minimum itself.
Exercise 2: Weakest-link statistics and the Weibull law
In this exercise, we consider a situation that is qualitatively different from the Gaussian case. Here, the random variables are bounded from below, and the minimum is controlled by the behavior of the distribution close to the edge of its support.
This will naturally lead to a different choice of scaling parameters and .
Consider a chain of length subjected to a tensile force . The chain breaks when its weakest link breaks. We denote by the force required to break the chain.
Let be the breaking strengths of the individual links. Assume that they are independent, identically distributed, and strictly positive random variables.
Throughout the exercise, we work in the limit of large .
The strength of each link is drawn from a Gamma distribution with shape parameter :
Questions:
- Compute the typical breaking force of the chain and determine its dependence on . (Hint: use the condition .)
- The breaking force of the chain is equal to the minimum of the random variables.
According to extreme value statistics, its distribution satisfies
Show that the appropriate scaling form is obtained by introducing
and
, and defining the rescaled variable
Determine the limiting, -independent distribution of , and identify the corresponding universal distribution.