L-6: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
<Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.
<Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.


= Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton=
== Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton==
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture.
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture.
We introduce two approximations:
We introduce two approximations:

Revision as of 15:51, 29 February 2024

Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process

Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.

Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton

Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:

  • Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction
σi=hCMhi+m2(whi),

.


  • The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set
σith=1,i

.


As a consequence, in the limit L, the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses σi. For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold

xi=1σi

Our goal is thus to determine their distribution Pw(x), given their intial distribution, P0(x), and a value of w.


Hence, an unstable point, xi<0, is stabilized to a value x>0 drawn from g(x). The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is 1Lx1+m2


we define  and write its evolution equation. 
  • Drive: Changing ww+dw gives
    Pw+dw(x)=Pw(x+dw)Pw(x)+m2dwxPw(x)
  • Instability: This shift is stable far from the origin, however for a fraction m2dwPw(0) of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be m2dwPw(0)g(x). Hence, one writes
wPw(x)m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)]
  • Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of
m2dwPw(0)x1+m2

where x=dxxg(x)

  • Avalanche: Let us call we can write
wPw(x)=m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)][1+Pw(0)x1+m2+(Pw(0)x1+m2)2+]

and finally:

wPw(x)=m21Pw(0)x1+m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)]

Stationary solution

Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:

0=xPstat(x)+Pstat(0)g(x)
  • Determne Pstat(0)=1x using
1=0dxPstat(x)=0dxxxPstat(x)
  • Show
Pstat(x)=1xxg(z)dz