L-6: Difference between revisions
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak. | <Strong> Goal: </Strong> We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak. | ||
= Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton= | == Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton== | ||
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. | Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. | ||
We introduce two approximations: | We introduce two approximations: |
Revision as of 15:51, 29 February 2024
Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process
Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.
Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton
Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:
- Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction
.
- The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set
.
As a consequence, in the limit , the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses . For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold
Our goal is thus to determine their distribution , given their intial distribution, , and a value of .
Hence, an unstable point, , is stabilized to a value drawn from .
The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is
we define and write its evolution equation.
- Drive: Changing gives
- Instability: This shift is stable far from the origin, however for a fraction of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be . Hence, one writes
- Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of
where
- Avalanche: Let us call we can write
and finally:
Stationary solution
Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:
- Determne using
- Show