L-6: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables
Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables


* <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w \to w + \dd w</math> each point decreases its distance to threshold  
* <Strong> Drive:</Strong> Increasing <math>w \to w + dw</math> each point decreases its distance to threshold  
<center><math> x_i \to x_i - m^2 \dd w   </math></center>.
<center><math> x_i \to x_i - m^2 dw   </math></center>.
As a consequence
As a consequence
<center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>
<center> <math>P_{w+dw}(x) = P_w(x+dw) \sim P_w(x) + m^2 dw \partial_x P_w(x)</math></center>
Line 32: Line 32:
*  <Strong> Instability 1: Stress drop  </Strong>  The instability occurs when a point is at <math> x_i =0 </math>. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
*  <Strong> Instability 1: Stress drop  </Strong>  The instability occurs when a point is at <math> x_i =0 </math>. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
<center> <math> x_i =0 \to x_i = \Delta  </math></center>
<center> <math> x_i =0 \to x_i = \Delta  </math></center>
Increasing <math>w \to w + \dd w</math>,  a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
Increasing <math>w \to w + dw</math>,  a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>


*  <Strong> Instability 2: Stress redistribution  </Strong>  The stress drop induces a stress redistribution and all blocks approach threshold.
<center><math>  
<center><math>  
\begin{cases}
x_i \to = x_i +\frac{1}{L} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2}  
\sigma_i=\sigma_i -\Delta  \quad \text{stress drop}\\ 
\\
\sigma_{i\pm 1}=\sigma_{i\pm 1} +\frac{1}{2} \frac{\Delta}{1+m^2} \quad \text{stress redistribution}\\
\end{cases}
  </math></center>
  </math></center>
Note that <math> \Delta</math> is a positive random variable drwan from  <math> g(\Delta)</math>.


Hence, an unstable point, <math>x_i<0 </math>, is stabilized  to a value <math>x>0 </math> drawn from  <math>g(x) </math>.
The stress redistribution induced on each bloch is <math> \frac{1}{L} \frac{x}{1+m^2}  </math>




we define  and write its evolution equation.


* Drive: Changing <math>w\to w+dw</math> gives 
* Instability:  This shift is stable far from the origin, however for a fraction <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) </math>  of the points of the interface is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to instability will be <math> m^2 d w P_w(0) g(x) </math>. Hence, one writes
<center> <math> \partial_w P_{w}(x) \sim m^2  \left[\partial_x P_w(x) + P_w(0) g(x) \right] </math> </center>
* Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of   
* Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of   
<center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center>
<center> <math> m^2 dw P_w(0) \frac{\overline{x}}{1+m^2} </math> </center>

Revision as of 17:58, 29 February 2024

Avalanches and Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process

Goal: We solve the mean field version of the cellular automaton, derive its avalanche statistics and make a connection with the Bienaymé-Galton-Watson process used to describe an epidemic outbreak.

Fully connected (mean field) model for the cellular automaton

Let's study the mean field version of the cellular automata introduced in the previous lecture. We introduce two approximations:

  • Replace the Laplacian, which is short range, with a mean field fully connected interction
σi=hCMhi+m2(whi),

.


  • The local threshold are all equal. In particular we set
σith=1,i

.


As a consequence, in the limit L, the statistical properties of the system are described by the distribution of the local stresses σi. For simplicity, instead of the stresses, we study the distance from threshold

xi=1σi

Our goal is thus to determine their distribution Pw(x), given their intial distribution, P0(x), and a value of w.

Dynamics

Let's rewrite the dynamics with the new variables

  • Drive: Increasing ww+dw each point decreases its distance to threshold
xixim2dw

.

As a consequence

Pw+dw(x)=Pw(x+dw)Pw(x)+m2dwxPw(x)


  • Instability 1: Stress drop The instability occurs when a point is at xi=0. Then, the point is stabilized (stress drop):
xi=0xi=Δ

Increasing ww+dw, a fraction m2dwPw(0) of the blocks is unstable. Due to the stress drop, their distance to threshold becomes m2dwPw(0)g(x). Hence, one writes

wPw(x)m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)]


  • Instability 2: Stress redistribution The stress drop induces a stress redistribution and all blocks approach threshold.
xi=xi+1LΔ1+m2



  • Stress redistribution: as a consequence all points move to the origin of
m2dwPw(0)x1+m2

where x=dxxg(x)

  • Avalanche: Let us call we can write
wPw(x)=m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)][1+Pw(0)x1+m2+(Pw(0)x1+m2)2+]

and finally:

wPw(x)=m21Pw(0)x1+m2[xPw(x)+Pw(0)g(x)]

Stationary solution

Increasing the drive the distribution converge to the fixed point:

0=xPstat(x)+Pstat(0)g(x)
  • Determne Pstat(0)=1x using
1=0dxPstat(x)=0dxxxPstat(x)
  • Show
Pstat(x)=1xxg(z)dz