L-4: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
= KPZ : from 1d to the Cayley tree=
= KPZ : from 1d to the Cayley tree=


We know a lot about KPZ, but still we have much to understand:
We know a lot about KPZ, but there is still much to understand:


* In <math>d=1</math> we found <math>\theta=1/3</math> and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctions of quantities like  <math>E_{\min}[x] - E_{\min}[x']</math>. However it does not identify the actual distribution of <math> E_{\min}</math> for a given <math>x</math>. In particular we have no idea from where Tracy Widom comes from.
* In <math>d=1</math>, we have found <math>\theta=1/3</math> and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctuations of quantities such as <math>E_{\min}[x] - E_{\min}[x']</math>. However, it does not determine the actual distribution of <math>E_{\min}</math> for a given <math>x</math>. In particular, we have no clear understanding of the origin of the Tracy-Widom distribution.


* In <math>d=\infty</math>, there is an exact solution for the Cayley tree that predicts a freezing transition to an 1RSB phase (<math>\theta=0</math>).
* In <math>d=\infty</math>, an exact solution exists for the Cayley tree, predicting a freezing transition to a 1RSB phase (<math>\theta=0</math>).


* In finite dimension, but larger than 1, there are no exact solutions. Numerical simulations find <math>\theta >0</math> in <math>d=2</math>. The case <math>d>2</math> is very interesting.
* In finite dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available. Numerical simulations indicate <math>\theta > 0</math> in <math>d=2</math>. The case <math>d > 2</math> remains particularly intriguing.


==Let's do replica!==
==Let's do replica!==
To make progress in disordered systems we have to go through the moments of the partition function. For simplicity we consider polymers starting in <math>0</math> and ending in  <math>x</math>. We recall that  
To make progress in disordered systems, we need to analyze the moments of the partition function. For simplicity, we consider polymers starting at <math>0</math> and ending at <math>x</math>. We recall that
* <math>V(x,\tau)</math> is a Gaussian field with
 
* <math>V(x,\tau)</math> is a Gaussian field with
<center> <math>
<center> <math>
\overline{V(x,\tau)}=0, \quad  \overline{V(x,\tau) V(x',\tau')} = D \delta^d(x-x') \delta(\tau-\tau')  
\overline{V(x,\tau)}=0, \quad  \overline{V(x,\tau) V(x',\tau')} = D \delta^d(x-x') \delta(\tau-\tau')  
</math></center>
</math></center>
* From the Wick theorem, for a generic Gaussian <math> W </math> field we have
 
* From Wick's theorem, for a generic Gaussian field <math> W </math>, we have
<center><math>
<center><math>
\overline{\exp(W)} = \exp\left[\overline{W} +\frac{1}{2} (\overline{W^2}-\overline{W}^2)\right] </math></center>
\overline{\exp(W)} = \exp\left[\overline{W} +\frac{1}{2} \left(\overline{W^2}-\overline{W}^2\right)\right]
</math></center>
 
===The first moment===
===The first moment===
The first moment of the partition function is simple to compute and corresponds to a single replica
The first moment of the partition function is straightforward to compute and corresponds to a single replica
<center> <math>
 
\overline{Z(x,t) } =\int_{x(0)=0}^{x(t)=x} {\cal D} x(\tau) \exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}2(\partial_\tau x)^2\right]  \overline{\exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int d \tau V(x(\tau),\tau ) \right]}
<center>
</math></center>
<math>
Note that the term <math> T^2 \overline{W^2} = \int d \tau_1 d\tau_2 \overline{V(x,\tau_1)V(x,\tau_2)}= D t \delta_0</math> has a short distance divergence due to the delta-function. Hence we can write:
\overline{Z(x,t) } =\int_{x(0)=0}^{x(t)=x} {\cal D} x(\tau) \exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\tau x)^2\right]  \overline{\exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int d \tau V(x(\tau),\tau ) \right]}
<center> <math>
</math>
\overline{Z(x,t) } = \frac{1}{(2 \pi t T)^{d/2}}\exp\left[ -\frac{1}{2} \frac{ x^2}{t T} \right]  \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{2T^2}  \right]
</center>
</math></center>
 
Note that the term <math> T^2 \overline{W^2} = \int d \tau_1 d\tau_2 \overline{V(x,\tau_1)V(x,\tau_2)}= D t \delta_0</math> exhibits a short-distance divergence due to the delta function. Hence, we can write:
 
<center>
<math>
\overline{Z(x,t) } = \frac{1}{(2 \pi t T)^{d/2}}\exp\left[ -\frac{1}{2} \frac{ x^2}{t T} \right]  \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{2T^2}  \right]
</math> 
</center> 
 
=== The second moment === 
 
For the second moment, there are two replicas: 
 
* **Step 1: The second moment is** 
 
<center> 
<math> 
\overline{Z(x,t)^2 } =\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2] \right]  \overline{\exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau_1 V(x_1(\tau_1),\tau_1 ) - \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau_2 V(x_2(\tau_2),\tau_2 )\right]} 
</math>
</center>


=== The second moment ===
* **Step 2: Using Wick's theorem, we obtain** 
For the second moment instead the are two replica


* Step 1: The second moment is
<center>
<center> <math>
<math>
\overline{Z(x,t)^2 } =\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 \right]  \overline{\exp\left[- \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau_1 V(x_1(\tau_1),\tau_1 ) - \frac{1}{T} \int_0^t d \tau_2 V(x_2(\tau_2),\tau_2 )\right]}
\overline{Z(x,t)^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{T^2}  \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right]
</math></center>
</math>
</center>


* Step 2: Use Wick and derive:
* **Step 3: Changing coordinates** <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math>, we get 
<center> <math>
\overline{Z(x,t)^2 } = \exp\left[ \frac{D  t \delta_0}{T^2}  \right]\int {\cal D} x_1\int  {\cal D} x_2 \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{2T}[(\partial_\tau x_1)^2+ (\partial_\tau x_2)^2 - \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[x_1(\tau)-x_2(\tau)]\right]
</math></center>


* Step 3: Now  change coordinate <math>X=(x_1+x_2)/2; \; u=x_1-x_2</math> and get:
<center>
<center> <math>
<math>
\overline{Z(x,t)^2} = (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2- \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]}
\overline{Z(x,t)^2} = (\overline{Z(x,t)})^2 \frac{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2- \frac{D}{T^2} \delta^d[u(\tau)]\right]}{\int_{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0} {\cal D} u  \exp\left[-  \int_0^t d \tau  \frac{1}{4T}(\partial_\tau u)^2\right]}
</math></center>
</math>
</center>


==Discussion==
==Discussion==

Revision as of 11:18, 2 February 2025

Goal : final lecture on KPZ and directed polymers at finite dimension. We will show that for a "glass transition" takes place.


KPZ : from 1d to the Cayley tree

We know a lot about KPZ, but there is still much to understand:

  • In , we have found and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctuations of quantities such as . However, it does not determine the actual distribution of for a given . In particular, we have no clear understanding of the origin of the Tracy-Widom distribution.
  • In , an exact solution exists for the Cayley tree, predicting a freezing transition to a 1RSB phase ().
  • In finite dimensions greater than one, no exact solutions are available. Numerical simulations indicate in . The case remains particularly intriguing.

Let's do replica!

To make progress in disordered systems, we need to analyze the moments of the partition function. For simplicity, we consider polymers starting at and ending at . We recall that:

  • is a Gaussian field with
  • From Wick's theorem, for a generic Gaussian field , we have

The first moment

The first moment of the partition function is straightforward to compute and corresponds to a single replica:

Note that the term exhibits a short-distance divergence due to the delta function. Hence, we can write:

The second moment

For the second moment, there are two replicas:

  • **Step 1: The second moment is**

  • **Step 2: Using Wick's theorem, we obtain**

  • **Step 3: Changing coordinates** , we get

Discussion

Hence, the quantity can be computed.

  • The denominator is the free propagator and gives a contribution .
  • Let us define the numerator

Remark 1: From Valentina's lecture, remember that if

the partition function is self-averaging and . The condition above is sufficient but not necessary. It is enough that , when , to have the equivalence between annealed and quenched averages.

Remark 2: From Feynman-Kac we can write the following equation

Here the Hamiltonian reads:

The single particle potential is time independent and actractive .

At large times the behaviour is dominatated by the low energy part of the spectrum.

  • In an actractive potential always gives a bound state. In particular the ground state has a negative energy . Hence at large times

grows exponentially. This means that at all temperature, when

  • For the low part of the spectrum is controlled by the strength of the prefactor . At high temperature we have a continuum positive spectrum, at low temperature bound states exist. Hence, when

This transition, in , is between a high temeprature, phase and a low temeprature no RSB phase.