T-2: Difference between revisions
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<li> <em> Energy correlations.</em> At variance with the REM, in the spherical <math>p</math>-spin the energies at different configurations are correlated. Show that <math>\overline{E(\vec{\sigma}) E(\vec{\tau})}= N q(\vec{\sigma}, \vec{\tau})^p/2 + o(1) </math>, where <math>q(\vec{\sigma}, \vec{\tau})= \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N \sigma_i \tau_i </math> is the overlap between the two configurations. Why an we say that for <math>p \to \infty </math> this model converges with the REM discussed in the previous TD?</li> | <li> <em> Energy correlations.</em> At variance with the REM, in the spherical <math>p</math>-spin the energies at different configurations are correlated. Show that <math>\overline{E(\vec{\sigma}) E(\vec{\tau})}= N q(\vec{\sigma}, \vec{\tau})^p/2 + o(1) </math>, where <math>q(\vec{\sigma}, \vec{\tau})= \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N \sigma_i \tau_i </math> is the overlap between the two configurations. Why an we say that for <math>p \to \infty </math> this model converges with the REM discussed in the previous TD?</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
<ol start="2"> | <ol start="2"> | ||
<li> <em> Energy contribution.</em> Show that computing <math>\overline{Z}</math> boils down to computing the average <math> \overline{e^{-\beta J_{i_1 \, \cdots i_p} \sigma_{i_1} \cdots \sigma_{i_p}}}</math>. Compute this average. Hint: if X is a centered Gaussian variable with variance <math>\sigma^2</math>, then <math>\overline{e^{\alpha X}}=e^{\frac{\alpha^2 \sigma^2}{2} }</math>. | <li> <em> Energy contribution.</em> Show that computing <math>\overline{Z}</math> boils down to computing the average <math> \overline{e^{-\beta J_{i_1 \, \cdots i_p} \sigma_{i_1} \cdots \sigma_{i_p}}}</math>. Compute this average. Hint: if X is a centered Gaussian variable with variance <math>\sigma^2</math>, then <math>\overline{e^{\alpha X}}=e^{\frac{\alpha^2 \sigma^2}{2} }</math>. | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<ol start="3"> | <ol start="3"> | ||
<li> <em> Entropy contribution.</em> The volume of a sphere of radius <math>\sqrt{N}</math> in dimension <math>N</math> is given by <math>N^{\frac{N}{2}} \pi^{\frac{N}{2}}/\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)!</math>. Use the large-N asymptotic of this to conclude the calculation of the annealed free energy: the final result is only slightly different with respect to the free-energy of the REM in the high-temperature phase: can you identify the source of this difference? </li> | <li> <em> Entropy contribution.</em> The volume of a sphere of radius <math>\sqrt{N}</math> in dimension <math>N</math> is given by <math>N^{\frac{N}{2}} \pi^{\frac{N}{2}}/\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)!</math>. Use the large-N asymptotic of this to conclude the calculation of the annealed free energy: the final result is only slightly different with respect to the free-energy of the REM in the high-temperature phase: can you identify the source of this difference? </li> |
Revision as of 00:16, 7 December 2023
In this set of problems, we use the replica method to study the equilibrium properties of a prototypical toy model of glasses, the spherical -spin model.
The model In the spherical -spin model the configurations that the system can take satisfy the spherical constraint , and the energy associated to each configuration is
where the coupling constants are independent random variables with Gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance and is an integer.
Quenched vs annealed
In TD1, we defined the quenched free energy density as the quantity controlling the scaling of the typical value of the partition function , which means:
The annealed free energy instead controls the scaling of the average value of . It is defined by
These formulas differ by the order in which the logarithm and the average over disorder are taken. Computing the average of the logarithm is in general a hard problem, which one can address by using a smart representation of the logarithm, that goes under the name of replica trick:
which can be easily shown to be true by Taylor expanding . Applying this to the average of the partition function, we see that
Therefore, to compute the quenched free-energy we need to compute the moments and then take the limit . The annealed one only requires to do the calculation with .
Problem 1: the annealed free energy
Let us first compute the annealed free energy.
- Energy correlations. At variance with the REM, in the spherical -spin the energies at different configurations are correlated. Show that , where is the overlap between the two configurations. Why an we say that for this model converges with the REM discussed in the previous TD?
- Energy contribution. Show that computing boils down to computing the average . Compute this average. Hint: if X is a centered Gaussian variable with variance , then .
- Entropy contribution. The volume of a sphere of radius in dimension is given by . Use the large-N asymptotic of this to conclude the calculation of the annealed free energy: the final result is only slightly different with respect to the free-energy of the REM in the high-temperature phase: can you identify the source of this difference?
Problem 2: the replica trick and the quenched free energy
The quenched free energy density is the quantity controlling the scaling of the typical value of the partition function . This means that
This calculation can be done in 3 main steps.
- Step 1: average over the disorder. ccc
- Step 2: identify the order parameter. cccc
- Step 3: the saddle point. cccc