L-7: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Goal.''' This lecture introduces the phenomenon of localization. Localization is a '''wave phenomenon induced by disorder''' that suppresses transport in a system.
'''Goal.''' This lecture introduces the phenomenon of localization. Localization is a '''wave phenomenon induced by disorder''' that suppresses transport in a system.


== Free particles and ballistic behaviour ==
== Short recap: wavefunctions and eigenstates ==
 
Before discussing localization we briefly recall a few basic notions of quantum mechanics.
 
A quantum particle in one dimension is described by a '''wavefunction''' <math>\psi(x,t)</math>. 
The quantity
 
<math>|\psi(x,t)|^2</math>
 
is the probability density of finding the particle at position <math>x</math> at time <math>t</math>. 
The wavefunction therefore satisfies the normalization condition
 
<math display="block">
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx\, |\psi(x,t)|^2 = 1 .
</math>
 
The time evolution of the wavefunction is governed by the Schrödinger equation
 
<math display="block">
i\hbar \partial_t \psi(x,t) = H\psi(x,t),
</math>
 
where <math>H</math> is the Hamiltonian of the system.
 
=== Eigenstates ===
 
A particularly important class of solutions are the '''eigenstates''' of the Hamiltonian
 
<math display="block">
H\psi_n(x) = E_n \psi_n(x).
</math>
 
If the particle is in an eigenstate the full solution reads
 
<math display="block">
\psi_n(x,t)=\psi_n(x)e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}.
</math>
 
The probability density <math>|\psi_n(x,t)|^2</math> is therefore independent of time: eigenstates are '''stationary states'''.
 
=== Discrete and continuous spectra ===
 
Two situations may occur.
 
* '''Discrete spectrum'''
 
The energies take isolated values <math>E_n</math>. 
This happens when the particle is confined in a finite region (for instance in a potential well). 
The eigenstates are normalizable and labeled by an integer <math>n</math>.
 
* '''Continuous spectrum'''
 
The energy can take any value in a continuous interval. 
This happens for instance for a free particle. The eigenstates are plane waves
 
<math display="block">
\psi_k(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{ikx},
\qquad
E=\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}.
</math>
 
These states are not normalizable in the usual sense. They are instead normalized using Dirac delta functions and serve as a basis for constructing physical wave packets.
 
=== Probability current ===
 
Besides the probability density one can define a '''probability current'''
 
<math display="block">
J(x,t)=\frac{\hbar}{2mi}
\left(
\psi^* \frac{d\psi}{dx}
-
\psi \frac{d\psi^*}{dx}
\right).
</math>
 
For a plane wave
 
<math display="block">
\psi(x)=e^{ikx}
</math>
 
one finds
 
<math display="block">
J=\frac{\hbar k}{m}.
</math>
 
Thus plane waves describe particles propagating through space.
 
=== Scattering states ===
 
Transport problems often involve a localized potential (for instance a disordered region) surrounded by free space. Outside this region the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are plane waves.
 
An incoming particle interacting with the sample generates reflected and transmitted waves. The corresponding solutions are called '''scattering states'''.
 
For example, a particle incoming from the left is described asymptotically by
 
<math display="block">
\psi_{k,L}(x)=
\begin{cases}
e^{ikx}+r e^{-ikx} & x\to -\infty \\
t e^{ikx} & x\to +\infty
\end{cases}
</math>
 
The first term represents the incoming wave, the second the reflected wave, and the transmitted wave propagates to the right with amplitude <math>t</math>.
 
The quantity
 
<math>T(E)=|t(E)|^2</math>
 
is the transmission probability of the sample.
 
=== Superposition principle ===
 
The Schrödinger equation is linear. Any linear combination of eigenstates is therefore again a solution.


The Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of the quantum state of a particle in one dimension:
For a continuous spectrum one writes


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
i\hbar \partial_t \psi(x,t)=H\psi(x,t),
\psi(x,t)=\int dk\, c(k)\psi_k(x,t),
\qquad
\qquad
H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+V(x).
\int dk\, |c(k)|^2=1.
</math>
</math>


Here <math>H</math> is the Hamiltonian. For a free particle the potential vanishes, <math>V(x)=0</math>.
By choosing the coefficients <math>c(k)</math> appropriately one can construct a localized '''wave packet''' describing a particle initially confined in space.
 
In the next section we study the time evolution of such a packet.
 
== Free particles and ballistic behaviour ==


One first looks for separable solutions, also called eigenstates or stationary solutions. If the particle is in an eigenstate, all physical observables are time independent.
Consider now the case of a free particle. The Hamiltonian is


For a free particle the stationary solutions are plane waves
<math display="block">
H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}.
</math>
 
The stationary solutions are plane waves


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 23: Line 147:
</math>
</math>


Here <math>k</math> is a real number and the spectrum is continuous. These solutions are completely delocalized over the real axis and cannot be normalized.
These states are completely delocalized and cannot represent a physical particle. Physical states are therefore constructed as superpositions of plane waves.
 
Physical states are obtained as superpositions of eigenstates. By the superposition principle any linear combination of stationary solutions is again a solution of the Schrödinger equation. Hence we can construct a localized wave packet:


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 35: Line 157:
=== Evolution of a Gaussian wave packet ===
=== Evolution of a Gaussian wave packet ===


* '''Initial state.'''
* '''Initial state'''
 
At time <math>t=0</math> consider the Gaussian packet
At time <math>t=0</math> consider the Gaussian packet


Line 50: Line 173:
</math>
</math>


* '''Time evolution.'''
* '''Time evolution'''


Define the spreading velocity
Define the spreading velocity
Line 66: Line 189:
</math>
</math>


* '''Ballistic spreading.'''
* '''Ballistic spreading'''


The probability density becomes
The probability density becomes
Line 96: Line 219:
It should be contrasted with the two other possible transport regimes:
It should be contrasted with the two other possible transport regimes:


* '''Diffusive motion''' (random walk):  
* '''Diffusive motion'''   
<math>\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle}\sim \sqrt{t}</math>
<math>\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle}\sim \sqrt{t}</math>


* '''Localized regime''':  
* '''Localized regime'''   
<math>\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle}</math> saturates at long times.
<math>\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle}</math> saturates at long times.


Understanding how disorder changes ballistic motion into diffusion and eventually localization is the main goal of the following lectures.
Understanding how disorder modifies ballistic motion and eventually suppresses transport is the main goal of the following sections.


== Localization of the packet: general idea and experiment ==
== Localization of the packet: general idea and experiment ==
Line 108: Line 231:
[[File:Localization1DB.png|thumb|left|x240px|BEC condensate expanding in a 1D disordered potential. Billy et al., Nature (2008).]]
[[File:Localization1DB.png|thumb|left|x240px|BEC condensate expanding in a 1D disordered potential. Billy et al., Nature (2008).]]


In 1958, P. Anderson proposed that disorder can suppress transport in quantum systems. This phenomenon, called '''Anderson localization''', has since been observed both numerically and experimentally.
In 1958, P. Anderson proposed that disorder can suppress transport in quantum systems. This phenomenon, known as '''Anderson localization''', has since been observed both numerically and experimentally.


In the experiment shown here, a Gaussian packet of a Bose–Einstein condensate is prepared in a harmonic trap. When the trap is removed the cloud initially starts to expand but quickly stops spreading and remains localized.
In the experiment shown here, a Gaussian packet of a Bose–Einstein condensate is prepared in a harmonic trap. When the trap is removed the cloud initially expands but quickly stops spreading and remains localized.


To understand this behaviour we must solve the eigenstate problem of the Hamiltonian in the presence of disorder.
To understand this behaviour we must solve the eigenstate problem of the Hamiltonian in the presence of disorder.
Line 122: Line 245:
</math>
</math>


The spatial part of the wavefunction is localized around some position <math>\bar{x}</math> and decays exponentially:
The spatial part of the wavefunction is localized around some position <math>\bar{x}</math> and decays exponentially


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
\psi_k(x)\sim
\psi_k(x)\sim
e^{-|x-\bar{x}|/\xi_{\text{loc}}(E_k)}.
e^{-|x-\bar{x}|/\xi_{\text{loc}}}.
</math>
</math>


Here <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}</math> is the localization length.
Here <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}</math> is the localization length.


Because the eigenstates are localized, each of them has support only in a finite spatial region. The wave packet is therefore built from eigenstates localized near its initial position.
Because the eigenstates are localized, the wave packet is built from states localized near its initial position. Eigenstates far from the packet contribute exponentially little, and states composing the packet decay exponentially away from their center.


Two important observations follow:
As a consequence transport far from the initial position of the particle is '''exponentially suppressed'''.
 
* eigenstates localized far from the packet contribute exponentially little to the wavefunction near the packet,
* eigenstates contributing to the packet decay exponentially far from their center.
 
As a consequence, transport far away from the initial position of the particle is '''exponentially suppressed'''.
 
Localization therefore does not mean that the particle is frozen. The wave packet can still evolve in time, but it cannot propagate arbitrarily far.


== Conductance and diffusive transport ==
== Conductance and diffusive transport ==


In most materials the effect of weak disorder is not localization but diffusion.
In most materials weak disorder leads to diffusion rather than localization.


In the Drude picture electrons scatter randomly on impurities. Beyond the mean free path the motion of electrons becomes diffusive.
In the Drude picture electrons scatter randomly on impurities. Beyond the mean free path their motion becomes diffusive.


In this regime Ohm's laws hold.
In this regime Ohm's laws hold.
Line 157: Line 273:
\frac{I}{V}=G.
\frac{I}{V}=G.
</math>
</math>
Here <math>R</math> is the resistance and <math>G</math> the conductance.


* Second law
* Second law
Line 168: Line 282:
</math>
</math>


Here <math>\rho</math> and <math>\sigma</math> are the resistivity and conductivity. These are material properties independent of the geometry of the sample.
Here <math>\rho</math> and <math>\sigma</math> are the resistivity and conductivity.
 
These phenomenological laws are the macroscopic manifestation of diffusive transport.


== Conductance in the localized regime ==
== Conductance in the localized regime ==


When disorder is strong, diffusion is suppressed and the system becomes insulating.
When disorder is strong diffusion is suppressed and the system becomes insulating.


In the localized phase the conductance decays exponentially with the system size:
In the localized phase the conductance decays exponentially with system size


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
G\sim e^{-2L/\xi_{\text{loc}}}.
G\sim e^{-2L/\xi_{\text{loc}}}.
</math>
</math>
The localization length <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}</math> characterizes the spatial decay of the eigenstates.


== The “Gang of Four” scaling theory ==
== The “Gang of Four” scaling theory ==
Line 188: Line 298:
In a famous PRL (1979), Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello and Ramakrishnan proposed a scaling theory of localization.
In a famous PRL (1979), Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello and Ramakrishnan proposed a scaling theory of localization.


It is based on the idea that the relevant quantity is the dimensionless conductance
The relevant quantity is the dimensionless conductance


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 199: Line 309:
\frac{d\ln g}{d\ln L}=\beta(g).
\frac{d\ln g}{d\ln L}=\beta(g).
</math>
</math>
The function <math>\beta(g)</math> depends only on <math>g</math> and the spatial dimension.


The asymptotic behaviours are
The asymptotic behaviours are
Line 212: Line 320:
</math>
</math>


The second relation reflects the exponential suppression of conductance in the localized regime.
If the beta function is monotonic the scaling theory predicts
 
If the beta function is monotonic, the scaling theory predicts:


* a metal–insulator transition for <math>d>2</math>,
* a metal–insulator transition for <math>d>2</math>,
* complete localization for <math>d\le2</math>.
* complete localization for <math>d\le2</math>.

Revision as of 23:16, 5 March 2026

Goal. This lecture introduces the phenomenon of localization. Localization is a wave phenomenon induced by disorder that suppresses transport in a system.

Short recap: wavefunctions and eigenstates

Before discussing localization we briefly recall a few basic notions of quantum mechanics.

A quantum particle in one dimension is described by a wavefunction ψ(x,t). The quantity

|ψ(x,t)|2

is the probability density of finding the particle at position x at time t. The wavefunction therefore satisfies the normalization condition

dx|ψ(x,t)|2=1.

The time evolution of the wavefunction is governed by the Schrödinger equation

itψ(x,t)=Hψ(x,t),

where H is the Hamiltonian of the system.

Eigenstates

A particularly important class of solutions are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian

Hψn(x)=Enψn(x).

If the particle is in an eigenstate the full solution reads

ψn(x,t)=ψn(x)eiEnt/.

The probability density |ψn(x,t)|2 is therefore independent of time: eigenstates are stationary states.

Discrete and continuous spectra

Two situations may occur.

  • Discrete spectrum

The energies take isolated values En. This happens when the particle is confined in a finite region (for instance in a potential well). The eigenstates are normalizable and labeled by an integer n.

  • Continuous spectrum

The energy can take any value in a continuous interval. This happens for instance for a free particle. The eigenstates are plane waves

ψk(x)=12πeikx,E=2k22m.

These states are not normalizable in the usual sense. They are instead normalized using Dirac delta functions and serve as a basis for constructing physical wave packets.

Probability current

Besides the probability density one can define a probability current

J(x,t)=2mi(ψ*dψdxψdψ*dx).

For a plane wave

ψ(x)=eikx

one finds

J=km.

Thus plane waves describe particles propagating through space.

Scattering states

Transport problems often involve a localized potential (for instance a disordered region) surrounded by free space. Outside this region the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are plane waves.

An incoming particle interacting with the sample generates reflected and transmitted waves. The corresponding solutions are called scattering states.

For example, a particle incoming from the left is described asymptotically by

ψk,L(x)={eikx+reikxxteikxx+

The first term represents the incoming wave, the second the reflected wave, and the transmitted wave propagates to the right with amplitude t.

The quantity

T(E)=|t(E)|2

is the transmission probability of the sample.

Superposition principle

The Schrödinger equation is linear. Any linear combination of eigenstates is therefore again a solution.

For a continuous spectrum one writes

ψ(x,t)=dkc(k)ψk(x,t),dk|c(k)|2=1.

By choosing the coefficients c(k) appropriately one can construct a localized wave packet describing a particle initially confined in space.

In the next section we study the time evolution of such a packet.

Free particles and ballistic behaviour

Consider now the case of a free particle. The Hamiltonian is

H=22md2dx2.

The stationary solutions are plane waves

ψk(x,t)=12πeikxeiEkt/,Ek=2k22m.

These states are completely delocalized and cannot represent a physical particle. Physical states are therefore constructed as superpositions of plane waves.

ψ(x,t)=dkc(k)ψk(x,t),dk|c(k)|2=1.

Evolution of a Gaussian wave packet

  • Initial state

At time t=0 consider the Gaussian packet

ψ(x,0)=ex2/(4a2)(2πa2)1/4,|ψ(x,0)|2=ex2/(2a2)2πa2.

Show that the coefficients of the plane wave decomposition are

c(k)=(2a2π)1/4ea2k2.

  • Time evolution

Define the spreading velocity

vs=2ma2.

Show that the time evolution of the packet is

ψ(x,t)=ex2/(4a2(1+ivst))[2πa2(1+ivst)]1/4.

  • Ballistic spreading

The probability density becomes

|ψ(x,t)|2=ex2/(2a2(1+vs2t2))2πa2(1+vs2t2).

Hence

x2=(dxx2|ψ(x,t)|2)1/2=a1+vs2t2.

At long times

x2vst.

This behaviour is called ballistic spreading.

It should be contrasted with the two other possible transport regimes:

  • Diffusive motion

x2t

  • Localized regime

x2 saturates at long times.

Understanding how disorder modifies ballistic motion and eventually suppresses transport is the main goal of the following sections.

Localization of the packet: general idea and experiment

BEC condensate expanding in a 1D disordered potential. Billy et al., Nature (2008).

In 1958, P. Anderson proposed that disorder can suppress transport in quantum systems. This phenomenon, known as Anderson localization, has since been observed both numerically and experimentally.

In the experiment shown here, a Gaussian packet of a Bose–Einstein condensate is prepared in a harmonic trap. When the trap is removed the cloud initially expands but quickly stops spreading and remains localized.

To understand this behaviour we must solve the eigenstate problem of the Hamiltonian in the presence of disorder.

Semilog plot of the particle density. Billy et al., Nature (2008).

In a disordered potential an eigenstate of energy Ek has the form

ψk(x,t)=ψk(x)eiEkt/.

The spatial part of the wavefunction is localized around some position x¯ and decays exponentially

ψk(x)e|xx¯|/ξloc.

Here ξloc is the localization length.

Because the eigenstates are localized, the wave packet is built from states localized near its initial position. Eigenstates far from the packet contribute exponentially little, and states composing the packet decay exponentially away from their center.

As a consequence transport far from the initial position of the particle is exponentially suppressed.

Conductance and diffusive transport

In most materials weak disorder leads to diffusion rather than localization.

In the Drude picture electrons scatter randomly on impurities. Beyond the mean free path their motion becomes diffusive.

In this regime Ohm's laws hold.

  • First law

VI=R,IV=G.

  • Second law

R=ρLSρL2d,G=σSLσLd2.

Here ρ and σ are the resistivity and conductivity.

Conductance in the localized regime

When disorder is strong diffusion is suppressed and the system becomes insulating.

In the localized phase the conductance decays exponentially with system size

Ge2L/ξloc.

The “Gang of Four” scaling theory

In a famous PRL (1979), Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello and Ramakrishnan proposed a scaling theory of localization.

The relevant quantity is the dimensionless conductance

g=Ge2.

The scaling equation reads

dlngdlnL=β(g).

The asymptotic behaviours are

β(g)={d2glngg0

If the beta function is monotonic the scaling theory predicts

  • a metal–insulator transition for d>2,
  • complete localization for d2.