L-7: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
</math>
</math>


The probability density <math>|\psi_n(x,t)|^2</math> is therefore independent of time: eigenstates are '''stationary states'''.
The probability density <math>|\psi_n(x,t)|^2</math> is therefore independent of time: eigenstates are '''stationary states'''.
Two qualitatively different situations may occur depending on the form of the potential.
 
In many physical situations the Hamiltonian has a mixed spectrum, containing both discrete bound states and continuum states. In this case a general wavefunction can be expressed as a superposition involving contributions from both sets of eigenstates.
A simple example is a finite potential well: it supports a finite number of bound states with discrete energies, while particles with higher energies belong to the continuum and correspond to scattering states.


=== Discrete and continuous spectra ===
=== Discrete and continuous spectra ===


Two situations may occur.


* '''Discrete spectrum'''
* '''Discrete spectrum (bound states)'''


The energies take isolated values <math>E_n</math>.   
The energies take isolated values <math>E_n</math>.   
This happens when the particle is confined in a finite region (for instance in a potential well).
This typically happens when the particle is confined in a finite region
The eigenstates are normalizable and labeled by an integer <math>n</math>.
(for instance in a potential well).
 
The corresponding eigenfunctions are normalizable,
 
<math display="block">
\int dx\, |\psi_n(x)|^2 = 1,
</math>
 
and the particle remains localized in space. These states are called
'''bound states'''.


* '''Continuous spectrum'''
* '''Continuous spectrum (continuum states)'''


The energy can take any value in a continuous interval.
The energy can take any value in a continuous interval.
This happens for instance for a free particle. The eigenstates are plane waves
This occurs for instance for a free particle or for a particle with
energy above the confining potential.
 
A simple example is provided by plane waves


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 57: Line 72:
</math>
</math>


These states are not normalizable in the usual sense. They are instead normalized using Dirac delta functions and serve as a basis for constructing physical wave packets.
These states are not normalizable in the usual sense. They are instead
normalized using Dirac delta functions and serve as a basis for
constructing physical wave packets.
 
=== Superposition principle ===
 
The Schrödinger equation is linear. As a consequence, any linear combination
of solutions is again a solution. This property is known as the
'''superposition principle'''.
 
If the spectrum is discrete, an arbitrary wavefunction can be expanded
in the basis of eigenstates
 
<math display="block">
\psi(x,t)=\sum_n c_n e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}\psi_n(x).
</math>
 
If the spectrum is continuous the expansion becomes an integral
 
<math display="block">
\psi(x,t)=\int dk\, c(k)\psi_k(x,t),
\qquad
\int dk\, |c(k)|^2=1.
</math>
 
By choosing the coefficients <math>c(k)</math> appropriately one can construct
a localized '''wave packet''' describing a particle initially confined in space.


=== Probability current ===
=== Probability current ===
Line 74: Line 115:
This quantity measures the '''flow of probability''' across a point in space.
This quantity measures the '''flow of probability''' across a point in space.


Its expression follows from combining the Schrödinger equation with the conservation of probability. Indeed the probability density
Its expression follows from combining the Schrödinger equation with the
conservation of probability. Indeed the probability density


<math>\rho(x,t)=|\psi(x,t)|^2</math>
<math>
\rho(x,t)=|\psi(x,t)|^2
</math>


satisfies a continuity equation
satisfies the continuity equation


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 84: Line 128:
</math>
</math>


which has the same structure as a conservation law in hydrodynamics
which has the same structure as a conservation law in hydrodynamics.
The current originates from the kinetic term of the Hamiltonian, which contains spatial derivatives.


For a plane wave
For a plane wave
Line 99: Line 142:
</math>
</math>


Thus plane waves describe particles propagating through space and carrying a non–zero current. If the wavefunction is real the probability current vanishes, since the two terms in the expression of <math>J</math> cancel.  
Thus plane waves describe particles propagating through space and carrying
This is the case for bound states in one dimension: for a real potential the eigenfunctions can be chosen real, and bound states in 1D are non–degenerate. Physically this corresponds to a '''standing wave''' rather than a propagating wave.
a non–zero probability current.
 
If the wavefunction is real the probability current vanishes, since the two
terms in the expression of <math>J</math> cancel. This is the case for bound
states in one dimension: for a real potential the eigenfunctions can be
chosen real, and bound states in 1D are non–degenerate. Physically this
corresponds to a '''standing wave''' rather than a propagating wave.


=== Scattering states ===
=== Scattering states ===


Transport problems often involve a localized potential (for instance a disordered region or a sample) surrounded by free space. Outside this region the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are plane waves.
Transport problems often involve a localized potential (for instance a sample
or a potential barrier) surrounded by free space. Outside this region the
solutions of the Schrödinger equation are plane waves.


When a particle interacts with the sample, the wavefunction generally contains three contributions:
When a particle interacts with the sample, the wavefunction generally contains
three contributions:


* an incoming wave,
* an incoming wave,
Line 124: Line 176:
</math>
</math>


The first term represents the incoming wave, the second the reflected wave, while the transmitted wave propagates to the right with amplitude <math>t</math>.
The first term represents the incoming wave, the second the reflected wave,
while the transmitted wave propagates to the right with amplitude <math>t</math>.


Using the expression of the probability current, one finds that a plane wave <math>e^{ikx}</math> carries a current
Using the expression of the probability current, one finds that a plane wave
<math>e^{ikx}</math> carries a current


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 132: Line 186:
</math>
</math>


Thus the incoming, reflected and transmitted waves correspond to incoming, reflected and transmitted probability currents. Since probability is conserved, the current is the same on both sides of the sample. This implies the relation
Thus the incoming, reflected and transmitted waves correspond to incoming,
reflected and transmitted probability currents.
 
Since probability is conserved, the current must be the same on both sides
of the sample. This implies the relation


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 146: Line 204:
are the reflection and transmission probabilities.
are the reflection and transmission probabilities.


These quantities will play a central role in transport problems, where the electrical current is determined by the transmission probability of the sample.
=== Superposition principle ===
The Schrödinger equation is linear. Any linear combination of eigenstates is therefore again a solution.
For a continuous spectrum one writes
<math display="block">
\psi(x,t)=\int dk\, c(k)\psi_k(x,t),
\qquad
\int dk\, |c(k)|^2=1.
</math>
By choosing the coefficients <math>c(k)</math> appropriately one can construct a localized '''wave packet''' describing a particle initially confined in space.
In the next section we study the time evolution of such a packet.


== Free particles and ballistic behaviour ==
== Free particles and ballistic behaviour ==

Revision as of 11:17, 8 March 2026

Goal. This lecture introduces the phenomenon of localization. Localization is a wave phenomenon induced by disorder that suppresses transport in a system.

Short recap: wavefunctions and eigenstates

Before discussing localization we briefly recall a few basic notions of quantum mechanics.

A quantum particle in one dimension is described by a wavefunction ψ(x,t). The quantity |ψ(x,t)|2 is the probability density of finding the particle at position x at time t. The wavefunction therefore satisfies the normalization condition

dx|ψ(x,t)|2=1.

The time evolution of the wavefunction is governed by the Schrödinger equation

itψ(x,t)=Hψ(x,t),

where H is the Hamiltonian of the system.

Eigenstates

A particularly important class of solutions are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian

Hψn(x)=Enψn(x).

If the particle is in an eigenstate the full solution reads

ψn(x,t)=ψn(x)eiEnt/.

The probability density |ψn(x,t)|2 is therefore independent of time: eigenstates are stationary states. Two qualitatively different situations may occur depending on the form of the potential.

In many physical situations the Hamiltonian has a mixed spectrum, containing both discrete bound states and continuum states. In this case a general wavefunction can be expressed as a superposition involving contributions from both sets of eigenstates. A simple example is a finite potential well: it supports a finite number of bound states with discrete energies, while particles with higher energies belong to the continuum and correspond to scattering states.

Discrete and continuous spectra

  • Discrete spectrum (bound states)

The energies take isolated values En. This typically happens when the particle is confined in a finite region (for instance in a potential well).

The corresponding eigenfunctions are normalizable,

dx|ψn(x)|2=1,

and the particle remains localized in space. These states are called bound states.

  • Continuous spectrum (continuum states)

The energy can take any value in a continuous interval. This occurs for instance for a free particle or for a particle with energy above the confining potential.

A simple example is provided by plane waves

ψk(x)=12πeikx,E=2k22m.

These states are not normalizable in the usual sense. They are instead normalized using Dirac delta functions and serve as a basis for constructing physical wave packets.

Superposition principle

The Schrödinger equation is linear. As a consequence, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution. This property is known as the superposition principle.

If the spectrum is discrete, an arbitrary wavefunction can be expanded in the basis of eigenstates

ψ(x,t)=ncneiEnt/ψn(x).

If the spectrum is continuous the expansion becomes an integral

ψ(x,t)=dkc(k)ψk(x,t),dk|c(k)|2=1.

By choosing the coefficients c(k) appropriately one can construct a localized wave packet describing a particle initially confined in space.

Probability current

Besides the probability density one can define a probability current

J(x,t)=2mi(ψ*dψdxψdψ*dx).

This quantity measures the flow of probability across a point in space.

Its expression follows from combining the Schrödinger equation with the conservation of probability. Indeed the probability density

ρ(x,t)=|ψ(x,t)|2

satisfies the continuity equation

tρ(x,t)+xJ(x,t)=0,

which has the same structure as a conservation law in hydrodynamics.

For a plane wave

ψ(x)=eikx

one finds

J=km.

Thus plane waves describe particles propagating through space and carrying a non–zero probability current.

If the wavefunction is real the probability current vanishes, since the two terms in the expression of J cancel. This is the case for bound states in one dimension: for a real potential the eigenfunctions can be chosen real, and bound states in 1D are non–degenerate. Physically this corresponds to a standing wave rather than a propagating wave.

Scattering states

Transport problems often involve a localized potential (for instance a sample or a potential barrier) surrounded by free space. Outside this region the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are plane waves.

When a particle interacts with the sample, the wavefunction generally contains three contributions:

  • an incoming wave,
  • a reflected wave,
  • a transmitted wave.

The corresponding solutions are called scattering states.

For example, a particle incoming from the left is described asymptotically by

ψk,L(x)={eikx+reikxxteikxx+

The first term represents the incoming wave, the second the reflected wave, while the transmitted wave propagates to the right with amplitude t.

Using the expression of the probability current, one finds that a plane wave eikx carries a current

J=km.

Thus the incoming, reflected and transmitted waves correspond to incoming, reflected and transmitted probability currents.

Since probability is conserved, the current must be the same on both sides of the sample. This implies the relation

R+T=1,

where

R=|r|2,T=|t|2

are the reflection and transmission probabilities.


Free particles and ballistic behaviour

We now illustrate how a localized quantum particle evolves in the absence of disorder.

For a free particle the Hamiltonian reads

H=22md2dx2.

As discussed above, the eigenstates of this Hamiltonian are plane waves with a continuous spectrum

ψk(x,t)=12πeikxeiEkt/,Ek=2k22m.

Since plane waves are completely delocalized, a physical particle must be described by a superposition of eigenstates, forming a wave packet

ψ(x,t)=dkc(k)ψk(x,t),dk|c(k)|2=1.

Evolution of a Gaussian wave packet

  • Initial state

At time t=0 consider a Gaussian wave packet

ψ(x,0)=ex2/(4a2)(2πa2)1/4,|ψ(x,0)|2=ex2/(2a2)2πa2.

Show that the coefficients of the plane-wave decomposition are

c(k)=(2a2π)1/4ea2k2.

  • Time evolution

Define the spreading velocity

vs=2ma2.

Show that the time evolution of the packet is

ψ(x,t)=ex2/(4a2(1+ivst))[2πa2(1+ivst)]1/4.

  • Ballistic spreading

The probability density becomes

|ψ(x,t)|2=ex2/(2a2(1+vs2t2))2πa2(1+vs2t2).

Hence

x2=(dxx2|ψ(x,t)|2)1/2=a1+vs2t2.

At long times

x2vst.

This linear growth is called ballistic spreading.

It should be contrasted with two other possible transport regimes:

  • Diffusive motion

x2t

  • Localized regime

x2 saturates at long times.

Understanding how disorder modifies ballistic motion and eventually suppresses transport is the main goal of the following sections.

Localization of the packet: general idea and experiment

BEC condensate expanding in a 1D disordered potential. Billy et al., Nature (2008).

In 1958, P. Anderson proposed that disorder can suppress transport in quantum systems. This phenomenon, known as Anderson localization, has since been observed both numerically and experimentally.

In the experiment shown here, a Gaussian packet of a Bose–Einstein condensate is prepared in a harmonic trap. When the trap is removed the cloud initially expands but quickly stops spreading and remains localized.

To understand this behaviour we must solve the eigenstate problem of the Hamiltonian in the presence of disorder.

Semilog plot of the particle density. Billy et al., Nature (2008).

In a disordered potential an eigenstate of energy Ek has the form

ψk(x,t)=ψk(x)eiEkt/.

The spatial part of the wavefunction is localized around some position x¯ and decays exponentially

ψk(x)e|xx¯|/ξloc.

Here ξloc is the localization length.

Because the eigenstates are localized, the wave packet is built from states localized near its initial position. Eigenstates far from the packet contribute exponentially little, and states composing the packet decay exponentially away from their center.

As a consequence transport far from the initial position of the particle is exponentially suppressed.

Conductance and diffusive transport

In most materials weak disorder does not lead to localization but to diffusive transport.

In the Drude picture electrons scatter randomly on impurities. After many scattering events their motion becomes a random walk. Beyond the mean free path the motion is therefore diffusive.

In this regime Ohm's laws hold.

  • First law

VI=R,IV=G.

  • Second law

R=ρLS,G=σSL.

Here ρ and σ are the resistivity and conductivity of the material.

For a sample of linear size L in spatial dimension d, the cross section scales as SLd1. Therefore

GσLd2.

This scaling behavior is the characteristic signature of diffusive transport.

Conductance in the localized regime

When disorder is strong diffusion is suppressed and the system becomes insulating.

In Exercise 15 we derived, using the Landauer picture of transport, that the conductance is proportional to the transmission probability

G=e2|t(EF)|2.

The factor e2/ therefore sets the natural quantum scale of conductance for a single channel.

In a localized system the transmission probability decays exponentially with the system size

|t(EF)|2e2L/ξloc,

which leads to

G(L)e2L/ξloc.

Thus the conductance decreases exponentially with the size of the sample.

The “Gang of Four” scaling theory

In a famous PRL (1979), Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello and Ramakrishnan proposed a scaling theory of localization.

The key quantity is the dimensionless conductance

g=Ge2.

In the Landauer picture this quantity measures how many quantum channels effectively contribute to transport.

The central question of the scaling theory is the following:

If we increase the size of a disordered sample, does it behave more and more like a metal or more and more like an insulator?

Instead of computing the conductance microscopically, the idea is to study how the conductance evolves when the system size L is increased.

This evolution is described by a renormalization group equation

dlngdlnL=β(g).

The function β(g) depends only on g and on the spatial dimension.

Two limits are known:

  • Metallic regime (g1)

Transport is diffusive. Since

GLd2,

we obtain

β(g)d2.

  • Localized regime (g1)

The conductance decays exponentially

geL/ξloc,

which implies

β(g)lng.

The simplest scenario is that the beta function is monotonic.

This leads to a striking dimensional prediction:

  • for d>2 the beta function changes sign → a metal–insulator transition exists
  • for d2 the beta function is always negative → all states are localized.

The scaling theory therefore predicts that in low dimension disorder inevitably destroys diffusion.

To understand how localization emerges microscopically we must now study the spectrum and eigenstates of quantum particles moving in a random potential.