Goal : final lecture on KPZ and directed polymers at finite dimension. We will show that for  a "glass transition" takes place.
 a "glass transition" takes place.
KPZ : from 1d to the Cayley tree
We know a lot about KPZ, but still we have much to understand:
- In   we found we found and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctions of quantities like and a glassy regime present at all temperatures. The stationary solution of the KPZ equation describes, at long times, the fluctions of quantities like![{\displaystyle E_{\min }[x]-E_{\min }[x']}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8a2c662761092e4a23c7637663414b6036af9ebd) . However it does not identify the actual distribution of . However it does not identify the actual distribution of for a given for a given . In particular we have no idea from where Tracy Widom comes from. . In particular we have no idea from where Tracy Widom comes from.
- In  , there is an exact solution for the Cayley tree that predicts a freezing transition to an 1RSB phase ( , there is an exact solution for the Cayley tree that predicts a freezing transition to an 1RSB phase ( ). ).
- In finite dimension, but larger than 1, there are no exact solutions. Numerical simulations find  in in . The case . The case is very interesting. is very interesting.
Let's do replica!
To make progress in disordered systems we have to go through the moments of the  partition function. For simplicity we consider polymers starting in  and ending in
 and ending in   . We recall that
. We recall that 
 is a Gaussian field with is a Gaussian field with
 
- From the Wick theorem, for a generic Gaussian  field we have field we have
![{\displaystyle {\overline {\exp(W)}}=\exp \left[{\overline {W}}+{\frac {1}{2}}({\overline {W^{2}}}-{\overline {W}}^{2})\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/ec766c1903396019121638fcaf787e48d74575af) 
The first moment
The first moment of the partition function is simple to compute and corresponds to a single replica
 ![{\displaystyle {\overline {Z(x,t)}}=\int _{x(0)=0}^{x(t)=x}{\cal {D}}x(\tau )\exp \left[-{\frac {1}{T}}\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{2}}(\partial _{\tau }x)^{2}\right]{\overline {\exp \left[-{\frac {1}{T}}\int d\tau V(x(\tau ),\tau )\right]}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/d0b519b352e5ae7b3ffbe699c59c68a7d74b9aca) 
Note that the term  has a short distance divergence due to the delta-function.  Hence we can write:
 has a short distance divergence due to the delta-function.  Hence we can write:
 ![{\displaystyle {\overline {Z(x,t)}}={\frac {1}{(2\pi tT)^{d/2}}}\exp \left[-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {x^{2}}{tT}}\right]\exp \left[{\frac {Dt\delta _{0}}{2T^{2}}}\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/08d9524086f3a551b1fe46af29264eeabd8d617c) 
The second moment
- Step 1: The second moment is
![{\displaystyle {\overline {Z(x,t)^{2}}}=\int {\cal {D}}x_{1}\int {\cal {D}}x_{2}\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{2T}}[(\partial _{\tau }x_{1})^{2}+(\partial _{\tau }x_{2})^{2}\right]{\overline {\exp \left[-{\frac {1}{T}}\int _{0}^{t}d\tau _{1}V(x_{1}(\tau _{1}),\tau _{1})-{\frac {1}{T}}\int _{0}^{t}d\tau _{2}V(x_{2}(\tau _{2}),\tau _{2})\right]}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/5abad76d8b7ca40434e7745699d952c5cb635882) 
- Step 2: Use Wick and derive:
![{\displaystyle {\overline {Z(x,t)^{2}}}=\exp \left[{\frac {Dt\delta _{0}}{T^{2}}}\right]\int {\cal {D}}x_{1}\int {\cal {D}}x_{2}\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{2T}}[(\partial _{\tau }x_{1})^{2}+(\partial _{\tau }x_{2})^{2}-{\frac {D}{T^{2}}}\delta ^{d}[x_{1}(\tau )-x_{2}(\tau )]\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/676d944dcea1d724aebbe188309f48570bb8aea2) 
- Step 3: Now  change coordinate  and get: and get:
![{\displaystyle {\overline {Z(x,t)^{2}}}=({\overline {Z(x,t)}})^{2}{\frac {\int _{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0}{\cal {D}}u\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{4T}}(\partial _{\tau }u)^{2}-{\frac {D}{T^{2}}}\delta ^{d}[u(\tau )]\right]}{\int _{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0}{\cal {D}}u\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{4T}}(\partial _{\tau }u)^{2}\right]}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8f024311b84b4659619c822da638865dae7ef4b8) 
Discussion
Hence, the quantity  can be computed.
 can be computed. 
- The denominator  ![{\displaystyle \int _{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0}{\cal {D}}u\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{4T}}(\partial _{\tau }u)^{2}\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/5c14899f4e5285970e94803d75f8ed26cef60f99) is the free propagator and gives a contribution is the free propagator and gives a contribution . .
- Let us define  the numerator
![{\displaystyle W(0,t)=\int _{u(0)=0}^{u(t)=0}{\cal {D}}u\exp \left[-\int _{0}^{t}d\tau {\frac {1}{4T}}(\partial _{\tau }u)^{2}-{\frac {D}{T^{2}}}\delta ^{d}[u(\tau )]\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c87e5edf3362882a5eb20b5350eff160bb175c04) 
Remark 1: From Valentina's lecture, remember that if 
  
the partition function is self-averaging and  .
The condition above is sufficient but not necessary. It is enough that
.
The condition above is sufficient but not necessary. It is enough that  ,  when
,  when  , to have the equivalence between  annealed and quenched averages.
, to have the equivalence between  annealed and quenched averages.
Remark 2: From Feynman-Kac we can write the following equation
  
Here the Hamiltonian reads:
 ![{\displaystyle {\hat {H}}=-2T\nabla ^{2}-{\frac {D}{T^{2}}}\delta ^{d}[u]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8e1967e57af58e816e303e482a4231049dc2f257) 
The single particle  potential  is  time independent and actractive .
  
At large times the behaviour is dominatated by the low energy part of the spectrum. 
- In  an actractive potential always gives a bound state. In particular the ground state has a negative energy an actractive potential always gives a bound state. In particular the ground state has a negative energy . Hence at large times . Hence at large times
 
grows exponentially. This means that at all temperature, when   
 
- For  the low part of the spectrum is controlled by the strength of the prefactor the low part of the spectrum is controlled by the strength of the prefactor . At high temperature we have a continuum positive spectrum, at low temperature bound states exist. Hence,   when . At high temperature we have a continuum positive spectrum, at low temperature bound states exist. Hence,   when 
 
This transition, in  , is between a high temeprature,
, is between a high temeprature,  phase and a low temeprature
 phase and a low temeprature  no RSB  phase.
  no RSB  phase.