L-9: Difference between revisions
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | =Eigenstates= | ||
In absence of disorder the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | |||
In | In presence of disorder, three situations can occur and to distinguish them it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio, IPR | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
The | The normalization imposes <math>\tau_1 =0 </math>. For <math>q=0</math>, <math>|\psi_n|^{2 q} =1 </math>, hence, <math>\tau_0 =-d </math>. | ||
* <Strong> Delocalized eigenstates</Strong> | * <Strong> Delocalized eigenstates</Strong> In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect | ||
<center><math> | |||
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=d(1-q) | |||
</math></center> | |||
* <Strong> Localized eigenstates</Strong> In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{1/d} </math> for <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect | |||
<center><math> | |||
IPR(q)= \text{const}, \quad \tau_q=0 | |||
</math></center> | |||
* <Strong> Multifractal eigenstates.</Strong> At the transition( the mobility edge) an anomalous scaling is observed: | |||
<center><math> | |||
IPR(q)=L^{D_q(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=D_q(1-q) | |||
</math></center> | |||
Here <math>D_q</math> is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than <math>d</math> and larger than zero. | |||
==Multifractality== | |||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called <Strong> multifractal exponent </Strong>: | |||
* <math>\tau_1 =0 </math> imposed by normalization. | |||
* <math>\tau_0 =-d </math> because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general <math>\tau_0 </math> is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property. | |||
=== Delocalized eigenstates === | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math> for all the <math> L^{d} </math> sites. This gives | In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math> for all the <math> L^{d} </math> sites. This gives | ||
Line 43: | Line 68: | ||
<Strong> A metal</Strong> has a simple spectrum. Indeed, all sites have <math>\alpha=d</math>, hence <math>f(\alpha=d)=d</math> and <math>f(\alpha\ne d ) =-\infty</math>. Then <math>\alpha^*(q)=d </math> becomes <math>q</math> independent. | <Strong> A metal</Strong> has a simple spectrum. Indeed, all sites have <math>\alpha=d</math>, hence <math>f(\alpha=d)=d</math> and <math>f(\alpha\ne d ) =-\infty</math>. Then <math>\alpha^*(q)=d </math> becomes <math>q</math> independent. | ||
<Strong> A multifractal </Strong> has a smooth spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math> with <math>f(\alpha_0)=d</math>. At <math>q=1</math>, <math>f'(\alpha_1)=1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1)=\alpha_1</math>. | <Strong> A multifractal </Strong> has a smooth spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math> with <math>f(\alpha_0)=d</math>. At <math>q=1</math>, <math>f'(\alpha_1)=1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1)=\alpha_1</math>. | ||
=Larkin model= | =Larkin model= | ||
Revision as of 15:25, 23 March 2025
Eigenstates
In absence of disorder the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In presence of disorder, three situations can occur and to distinguish them it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio, IPR
The normalization imposes . For , , hence, .
- Delocalized eigenstates In this case, . Hence, we expect
- Localized eigenstates In this case, for sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
- Multifractal eigenstates. At the transition( the mobility edge) an anomalous scaling is observed:
Here is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than and larger than zero.
Multifractality
The exponent is called multifractal exponent :
- imposed by normalization.
- because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property.
Delocalized eigenstates
In this case, for all the sites. This gives
- Multifractal eigenstates.
This case correspond to more complex wave function for which we expect
The exponent is positive and is called multifractal spectrum . It is a convex function and its maximum is the fractal dimension of the object, in our case d. We can determine the relation between multifractal spectrum and exponent
for large L
This means that for that verifies we have
A metal has a simple spectrum. Indeed, all sites have , hence and . Then becomes independent.
A multifractal has a smooth spectrum with a maximum at with . At , and .
Larkin model
In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface:
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
- The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up, the length of correlation of the disorder along the h direction . This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from
You get
Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force
In we have