L-9: Difference between revisions
(→Tails) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | =Eigenstates= | ||
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | |||
In the | In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure. | ||
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR). | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
== Delocalized eigenstates== | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect | |||
<center><math> | |||
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=d(1-q) | |||
</math></center> | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx | ==Localized eigenstates== | ||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{1/d} </math> for <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)= \text{const}, \quad \tau_q=0 | |||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
== Multifractal eigenstates == | |||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called the '''multifractal exponent'''. It is a non-decreasing function of <math>q</math> with some special points: | |||
* <math>\tau_0 = -d</math>, since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, <math>\tau_0</math> represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property. | |||
* <math>\tau_1 = 0</math>, imposed by normalization. | |||
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect: | |||
<center><math> |\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites}. </math></center> | |||
The exponent <math>\alpha</math> is positive, and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called the '''multifractal spectrum'''. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is <math>d</math>. The relation between the multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and the exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is given by: | |||
<center><math> IPR(q) = \sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} \sim \int d\alpha \, L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} </math></center> for large <math>L</math>. From this, we obtain: <center><math> \tau(q) = \min_{\alpha} (\alpha q - f(\alpha)). </math></center> | |||
This implies that for <math>\alpha^*(q)</math>, which satisfies | |||
<center><math> f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q, </math></center> we have <center><math> \tau(q) = \alpha^*(q) q - f(\alpha^*(q)). </math></center> | |||
'''Delocalized wavefunctions''' have a simple spectrum: for <math>\alpha = d</math>, we find <math>f(\alpha = d) = d</math> and <math>f(\alpha \neq d) = -\infty</math>. This means that <math>\alpha^*(q) = d</math> is independent of <math>q</math>. | |||
'''Multifractal wavefunctions''' exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math>, where <math>f(\alpha_0) = d</math>. At <math>q = 1</math>, we have <math>f'(\alpha_1) = 1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1) = \alpha_1</math>. | |||
=Larkin model= | |||
In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface: | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\partial_t h(r,t) = \nabla^2 h(r,t) + F(r) | |||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder | |||
<math>\overline{F(r)}=0</math>, <math> \overline{F(r)F(r')}=\sigma^2 \delta^d(r-r') </math>. | |||
You proved that: | |||
* the roughness exponent of this model is <math>\zeta_L=\frac{4-d}{2}</math> below dimension 4 | |||
* The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is <math> f= \sigma/\sqrt{L^d}</math> | |||
* at long times the interface shape is | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\overline{h(q)h(-q)} = \frac{\sigma^2}{q^{d+2\zeta_L}} | |||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up, <math> r_f</math> the length of correlation of the disorder <Strong> along the h direction </Strong>. This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\ | \overline{(h(r)-h(0))^2}= \int _d^dq (\overline{h(q)h(-q)}(1-\cos(q r) \sim \sigma^2 r^{2 \zeta_L} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
You get | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\ | \overline{(h(\ell_L)-h(0))^2}= r_f^2 \quad \ell_L=\left(\frac{r_f}{\sigma} \right)^{1/\zeta_L} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\ | f_c= \frac{\sigma}{\ell_L^{d/(2 \zeta_L)}} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
In <math>d=1</math> we have <math>\ell_L=\left(\frac{r_f}{\sigma} \right)^{2/3}</math> | |||
<math> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 23 March 2025
Eigenstates
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).
Delocalized eigenstates
In this case, . Hence, we expect
Localized eigenstates
In this case, for sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
Multifractal eigenstates
The exponent is called the multifractal exponent. It is a non-decreasing function of with some special points:
- , since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property.
- , imposed by normalization.
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect:
The exponent is positive, and is called the multifractal spectrum. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is . The relation between the multifractal spectrum and the exponent is given by:
for large . From this, we obtain:
This implies that for , which satisfies
we have
Delocalized wavefunctions have a simple spectrum: for , we find and . This means that is independent of .
Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at , where . At , we have and .
Larkin model
In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface:
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
- The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up, the length of correlation of the disorder along the h direction . This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from
You get
Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force
In we have