L-9: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Eigenstates=
=Eigenstates=
In absence of disorder the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.


In presence of disorder, three situations can occur and to distinguish them it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio, IPR
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.
 
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).
<center><math>
<center><math>
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q}
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q}
</math></center>
</math></center>
The normalization imposes <math>\tau_1 =0 </math>. For  <math>q=0</math>, <math>|\psi_n|^{2 q} =1 </math>, hence,  <math>\tau_0 =-d </math>.


* <Strong> Delocalized eigenstates</Strong> In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect  
== Delocalized eigenstates==
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect  
<center><math>
<center><math>
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)}  \quad \tau_q=d(1-q)
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)}  \quad \tau_q=d(1-q)
</math></center>
</math></center>


* <Strong> Localized eigenstates</Strong> In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{1/d} </math> for <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect  
==Localized eigenstates==
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{1/d} </math> for <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect  
<center><math>
<center><math>
IPR(q)= \text{const},  \quad \tau_q=0
IPR(q)= \text{const},  \quad \tau_q=0
</math></center>
</math></center>


* <Strong> Multifractal eigenstates.</Strong>  At the transition(  the mobility edge) an anomalous scaling is observed:
<center><math>
IPR(q)=L^{D_q(1-q)}  \quad \tau_q=D_q(1-q) 
</math></center>
Here <math>D_q</math> is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than <math>d</math> and larger than zero.


== Multifractal eigenstates ==


The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called the '''multifractal exponent'''. It is a non-decreasing function of <math>q</math> with some special points:


==Multifractality==
*   <math>\tau_0 = -d</math>, since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, <math>\tau_0</math> represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property.
 
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called <Strong> multifractal exponent </Strong>:
 
* <math>\tau_1 =0 </math> imposed by normalization.
* <math>\tau_0 =-d </math> because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general <math>\tau_0 </math> is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property.
 
=== Delocalized eigenstates ===
 
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math> for all the <math> L^{d} </math> sites. This gives
<center><math>
\tau_q^{\text{deloc}}=d(q-1)
</math></center>
 


*    <math>\tau_1 = 0</math>, imposed by normalization.


* <Strong> Multifractal eigenstates.</Strong>
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect:
This case correspond to more complex wave function for which
<center><math> |\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites}. </math></center>
we expect


<center><math>
The exponent <math>\alpha</math> is positive, and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called the '''multifractal spectrum'''. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is <math>d</math>. The relation between the multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and the exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is given by:
|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad  \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites} 
<center><math> IPR(q) = \sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} \sim \int d\alpha \, L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} </math></center> for large <math>L</math>. From this, we obtain: <center><math> \tau(q) = \min_{\alpha} (\alpha q - f(\alpha)). </math></center>
</math></center>
The exponent <math>\alpha </math> is positive and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called <Strong> multifractal spectrum </Strong>. It is a convex function and its maximum is the fractal dimension of the object, in our case d. We can determine the relation between multifractal spectrum and exponent  
<center><math>
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q}\sim \int d \alpha L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)}  
</math></center>
for large L
<center><math>
\tau(q)= \min_{\alpha}{(\alpha q -f(\alpha))
</math></center>
This means that for <math>\alpha^*(q) </math> that verifies <math>
f'(\alpha^*(q))  = q
</math> we have


<center><math>
This implies that for <math>\alpha^*(q)</math>, which satisfies
\tau(q)= \alpha^*(q) q -f(\alpha^*(q))
<center><math> f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q, </math></center> we have <center><math> \tau(q) = \alpha^*(q) q - f(\alpha^*(q)). </math></center>
</math></center>


'''Delocalized wavefunctions''' have a simple spectrum: for <math>\alpha = d</math>, we find <math>f(\alpha = d) = d</math> and <math>f(\alpha \neq d) = -\infty</math>. This means that <math>\alpha^*(q) = d</math> is independent of <math>q</math>.


<Strong> A metal</Strong>  has a simple spectrum. Indeed, all sites have  <math>\alpha=d</math>, hence  <math>f(\alpha=d)=d</math> and <math>f(\alpha\ne d ) =-\infty</math>. Then <math>\alpha^*(q)=d </math> becomes <math>q</math> independent.
'''Multifractal wavefunctions''' exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math>, where <math>f(\alpha_0) = d</math>. At <math>q = 1</math>, we have <math>f'(\alpha_1) = 1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1) = \alpha_1</math>.
<Strong> A multifractal </Strong> has a smooth spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math> with <math>f(\alpha_0)=d</math>. At <math>q=1</math>, <math>f'(\alpha_1)=1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1)=\alpha_1</math>.


=Larkin model=
=Larkin model=

Latest revision as of 16:38, 23 March 2025

Eigenstates

Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.

In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.

To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).

Delocalized eigenstates

In this case, . Hence, we expect

Localized eigenstates

In this case, for sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect


Multifractal eigenstates

The exponent is called the multifractal exponent. It is a non-decreasing function of with some special points:

  • , since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property.
  • , imposed by normalization.

To observe multifractal behavior, we expect:

The exponent is positive, and is called the multifractal spectrum. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is . The relation between the multifractal spectrum and the exponent is given by:

for large . From this, we obtain:

This implies that for , which satisfies

we have

Delocalized wavefunctions have a simple spectrum: for , we find and . This means that is independent of .

Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at , where . At , we have and .

Larkin model

In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface:

For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .

You proved that:

  • the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
  • The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
  • at long times the interface shape is

In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up, the length of correlation of the disorder along the h direction . This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from

You get

Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force

In we have