|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ==Multifractal eigenstates== | | == Multifractal eigenstates == |
|
| |
|
| The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called <Strong> multifractal exponent </Strong>. It is a non decreasing function with q with some special points: | | The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called the '''multifractal exponent'''. It is a non-decreasing function of <math>q</math> with some special points: |
| * <math>\tau_0 =-d </math> because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general <math>\tau_0 </math> is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property.
| |
| * <math>\tau_1 =0 </math> imposed by normalization.
| |
|
| |
|
| To have multifractal behaviour we expect
| | * <math>\tau_0 = -d</math>, since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, <math>\tau_0</math> represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property. |
| <center><math>
| |
| |\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites}
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| The exponent <math>\alpha </math> is positive and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called <Strong> multifractal spectrum </Strong>. Its maximum is the fractal dimension of the object, in our case d. We can determine the relation between multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and exponent <math>\tau_q</math>
| |
| <center><math>
| |
| IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q}\sim \int d \alpha L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)}
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| for large L
| |
| <center><math>
| |
| \tau(q)= \min_{\alpha}{(\alpha q -f(\alpha))}
| |
| </math></center>
| |
| This means that for <math>\alpha^*(q) </math> that verifies <math>
| |
| f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q
| |
| </math>
| |
| we have
| |
| <center><math>
| |
| \tau(q)= \alpha^*(q) q -f(\alpha^*(q))
| |
| </math></center>
| |
|
| |
|
| | * <math>\tau_1 = 0</math>, imposed by normalization. |
|
| |
|
| <Strong> Delocalized wave functions</Strong> have a simple spectrum: For <math>\alpha=d</math>, we have <math>f(\alpha=d)=d</math> and <math>f(\alpha\ne d ) =-\infty</math>. Then <math>\alpha^*(q)=d </math> becomes <math>q</math> independent. | | To observe multifractal behavior, we expect: |
| <Strong> Multifractal wave functions </Strong> smooth this edge dependence and display a smooth spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math> with <math>f(\alpha_0)=d</math>. At <math>q=1</math>, <math>f'(\alpha_1)=1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1)=\alpha_1</math>.
| | <center><math> |\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites}. </math></center> |
|
| |
|
| Sometimes one writes:
| | The exponent <math>\alpha</math> is positive, and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called the '''multifractal spectrum'''. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is <math>d</math>. The relation between the multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and the exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is given by: |
| <center><math> | | <center><math> IPR(q) = \sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} \sim \int d\alpha \, L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} </math></center> for large <math>L</math>. From this, we obtain: <center><math> \tau(q) = \min_{\alpha} (\alpha q - f(\alpha)). </math></center> |
| IPR(q)=L^{D_q(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=D_q(1-q) | | |
| </math></center> | | This implies that for <math>\alpha^*(q)</math>, which satisfies |
| Here <math>D_q</math> is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than <math>d</math> and larger than zero.
| | <center><math> f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q, </math></center> we have <center><math> \tau(q) = \alpha^*(q) q - f(\alpha^*(q)). </math></center> |
| | |
| | '''Delocalized wavefunctions''' have a simple spectrum: for <math>\alpha = d</math>, we find <math>f(\alpha = d) = d</math> and <math>f(\alpha \neq d) = -\infty</math>. This means that <math>\alpha^*(q) = d</math> is independent of <math>q</math>. |
| | |
| | '''Multifractal wavefunctions''' exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math>, where <math>f(\alpha_0) = d</math>. At <math>q = 1</math>, we have <math>f'(\alpha_1) = 1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1) = \alpha_1</math>. |
|
| |
|
| =Larkin model= | | =Larkin model= |
Latest revision as of 16:38, 23 March 2025
Eigenstates
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).
Delocalized eigenstates
In this case,
. Hence, we expect
Localized eigenstates
In this case,
for
sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
Multifractal eigenstates
The exponent
is called the multifractal exponent. It is a non-decreasing function of
with some special points:
, since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general,
represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property.
, imposed by normalization.
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect:
The exponent
is positive, and
is called the multifractal spectrum. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is
. The relation between the multifractal spectrum
and the exponent
is given by:

for large
. From this, we obtain:
This implies that for
, which satisfies

we have
Delocalized wavefunctions have a simple spectrum: for
, we find
and
. This means that
is independent of
.
Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at
, where
. At
, we have
and
.
Larkin model
In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface:
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder
,
.
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is
below dimension 4
- The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is

- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up,
the length of correlation of the disorder along the h direction . This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from
You get
Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force
In
we have