T-7: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
</math>
</math>
</center> </li><br>
</center> </li><br>


<li><em> Cavity equations. </em>We now apply this to a specific example: we consider a Bethe lattice, and choose one site 0 as the root. We then choose <math> V </math> to be the kinetic terms connecting the root to its <math> k+1 </math> neighbours <math> a_i </math>,
<li><em> Cavity equations. </em>We now apply this to a specific example: we consider a Bethe lattice, and choose one site 0 as the root. We then choose <math> V </math> to be the kinetic terms connecting the root to its <math> k+1 </math> neighbours <math> a_i </math>,
Line 64: Line 63:
<center>
<center>
<math>  
<math>  
G^{\text{cav}}_{a_i} \equiv G^0_{a_i a_i}, \quad \quad \sigma^{\text{cav}}_{a_i} \equiv \sigma^0_{a_i a_i}
G^{\text{cav}}_{a_i} \equiv G^0_{a_i a_i}, \quad \quad \sigma^{\text{cav}}_{a_i} \equiv \sigma^0_{a_i a_i},
</math>  
</math>  
</center>
</center>
where <math>  \sigma^0 </math> is the self energy associated to <math> G^0 </math>.


</li>
</li>

Revision as of 15:50, 14 January 2024

Goal: the goal of this set of problems is to derive an estimate for the transition point for the Anderson model on the Bethe lattice.
Techniques: cavity method, stability analysis.

A criterion for localization

  • Green functions and self-energies. Given a lattice with N sites a, we call |a the wave function completely localised in site a. The Anderson model has Hamiltonian

    H=Waϵa|aa|<a,b>tab(|ab|+|ba|)

    where the local fields ϵa are random variables. We introduce the Green functions Gab(z) and the local self-energies σa(z): these are functions of a complex variable belonging to the upper half of the complex plane, and are defined by [NOTA SU STILTJIES]

    Gab(z)=a|1zH|b,Gaa(z)=a|1zH|a=1zϵaσa(z).

    It is clear that when the kinetic term V in the Hamiltonian vanishes, the local self-energies vanish; these quantities encode how much the energy levels ϵa are shifted by the presence of the kinetic term V. They are random functions, because the Hamiltonian contains randomness. They encode properties on the spectrum of the Hamiltonian; the local density of eigenvalues ρa,N(E) for an Hamiltonian of size N is in fact given by

    ρa,N(E)=1πlimη0Gaa(E+iη)=α=1N|Eα|a|2δ(EEα),

    where Eα are the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. [NOTA SU PLEMELJI]


  • A criterion for localization. The local self-energies encode some information on whether localization occurs. More precisely, one can claim [CITE] that localization occurs whenever the imaginary part of σ(E+iη) goes to zero when η0. Given the randomness, this criterion should however be formulated probabilistically. One has:

    limη0limN(σa(E+iη)>0)=0Localization

  • Notice that in this criterion, the probability plays the role of an order parameter (like the magnetization in ferromagnets, or the overlap in spin glasses), and the imaginary part η plays the role of a symmetry breaking field (like the magnetic field in the ferromagnet, or the coupling between replicas in spin glasses). However, the localization transition has nothing to do with equilibrium, i.e., it is not related to a change of structure of the Gibbs Boltzmann measure; rather, it is a dynamical transition. Pushing the analogy with equilibrium phase transitions, one can say that the localised phase corresponds to the disordered phase (the one in which symmetry is not broken, like the paramagnetic phase). The symmetry in question is time-reversal symmetry.

    Problem 7.1:

    The Bethe lattice is a lattice with a regular tree structure: each node has a fixed number of neighbours k+1, where k is the branching number, and there are no loops (see sketch). In these problems we consider the Anderson model on such lattice.


    1. Green functions equations. Consider an Hamiltonian split into two parts, H=H0+V. Show that the following general relation holds

      G=G0+G0VG,G0=1zH0,G=1zH.


    2. Cavity equations. We now apply this to a specific example: we consider a Bethe lattice, and choose one site 0 as the root. We then choose V to be the kinetic terms connecting the root to its k+1 neighbours ai,

      V=i=1k+1t0ai(|ai0|+|0ai|)

      For all the ai with i=1,,k+1 we introduce the notation

      GaicavGaiai0,σaicavσaiai0,

      where σ0 is the self energy associated to G0.



    - Show that G= Consider the Bethe lattice and the three links that connect the root with the K subtrees. Call V the sum of these three terms, and H0 the rest. Moreover, Let us call Γaa the cavity green function at the site a, that is the green function associated H0 only. Show that, because of the geometry of the lattice, this is the green function one would get removing the site zero. Moreover, all these green functions are independent from each others. - Finally, show that the relation above becomes the relation:; with a similar argument, show that the following recursive equation holds for the green functions. - show equation for real and imaginary part of cavity self energy - the distribution equations

    Problem 7.2:

    - Laplace transform - the tails - the solution for beta - the estimate for the transition



    Next TD: the directed polymer treatment: KPP (es 1)

    es 2: The connection to directed polymer: linearisation and stability. Glassiness vs localization

    Check out: key concepts of this TD

    References

    • Anderson. Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems [1]