L-2: Difference between revisions

From Disordered Systems Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 83: Line 83:
  \partial_t h(r,t)= \nu \nabla^2 h(r,t)+ \frac{\lambda}{2} (\nabla h)^2 + \eta(r,t)
  \partial_t h(r,t)= \nu \nabla^2 h(r,t)+ \frac{\lambda}{2} (\nabla h)^2 + \eta(r,t)
</math></center>
</math></center>


==Scaling Invariance==
==Scaling Invariance==


The symmetry <math> h </math> and <math> h +c </math> still holds so that scale invariance is still expected.  
The symmetry <math> h </math> and <math> h +c </math> still holds so that scale invariance is still expected.  
However the non-linearity originate an anomalous dimension and <math> z,\alpha </math> cannot be determined by simple dimensional analysis. Moreover, the previous scaling relation does not holds because the non-linear term is non-conservative:
However the non-linearity originate an anomalous dimension and <math> z,\alpha </math> cannot be determined by simple dimensional analysis.  
 
<!-- Moreover, the previous scaling relation does not holds because the non-linear term is non-conservative:
<center> <math>
<center> <math>
  \int d r (\nabla h)^2 >0 \quad \text{so that} \int d r \partial_t h(r,t) \ne \int d r \eta(r,t)
  \int d r (\nabla h)^2 >0 \quad \text{so that} \int d r \partial_t h(r,t) \ne \int d r \eta(r,t)
</math></center>
</math></center>
 
Note that <math> E_{pot} (t)= \sum_q {\cal E}_q (t) =  \frac{L \sigma}{2} \sum_q q^2 h_q(t)h_{-q}(t)  </math>
* Compute <math> \langle \cal{E}_q (t)\rangle  </math> which describes how the noise injects the energy on the different modes. Comment about  equipartition and the dynamical exponent 
--!>
===An important symmetry===
===An important symmetry===
Let us remark that if  <math> h(r,t) </math> is a solution of KPZ,also <math>  h(r - \lambda v_0 t,t) +v_0 r -(v_0^2 \lambda /2) t </math> is a solution of KPZ.
Let us remark that if  <math> h(r,t) </math> is a solution of KPZ,also <math>  h(r - \lambda v_0 t,t) +v_0 r -(v_0^2 \lambda /2) t </math> is a solution of KPZ.
Line 108: Line 114:
</center>  
</center>  
   
   
==== Stochastic Burgers and Galilean invariance ====
<!-- ==== Stochastic Burgers and Galilean invariance ====
Let's discuss for simplicity  the 1-dimensional case and perform the following change of variable
Let's discuss for simplicity  the 1-dimensional case and perform the following change of variable
  <center>  
  <center>  
Line 122: Line 128:
</center>  
</center>  
Check that the important symmetry of the KPZ equation is nothing but the Galilean symmetry of the Burgers equation.
Check that the important symmetry of the KPZ equation is nothing but the Galilean symmetry of the Burgers equation.
 
--!>
===The d=1 case===
===The d=1 case===

Revision as of 19:33, 28 January 2024

Goal: The physical properties of many materials are controlled by the interfaces embedded in it. This is the case of the dislocations in a crystal, the domain walls in a ferromagnet or the vortices in a supercoductors. In the next lecture we will discuss how impurities affect the behviour of these interfaces. Today we focus on thermal fluctuations and introduce two important equations for the interface dynamics: the Edwards Wilkinson (EW) and the Kardar Parisi Zhang (KPZ) equations.


Edwards Wilkinson: an interface at equilibrium:

Consider domain wall fluctuating at equilibrium at the temparature . Here is time, defines the d-dimensional coordinate of the interface and is the scalar height field. Hence, the domain wall separating two phases in a film has , in a solid instead .

Two assumptions are done:

  • Overhangs, pinch-off are neglected, so that is a scalar univalued function.
  • The dynamics is overdamped, so that we can neglect the inertial term.

Derivation

The Langevin equation of motion is

The first term is the elastic force trying to smooth the interface, the mobility is inversily proportional to the viscosity. The second term is the Langevin Gaussian noise defined by the correlations

The symbol indicates the average over the thermal noise. The diffusion constant is fixed by the Eistein relation (fluctuation-dissipation theorem):

The potential energy of surface tension can be expanded at the lowest order in the gradient:

Setting we have the Edwards Wilkinson equation:

Scaling Invariance

The equation enjoys of a continuous symmetry because and cannot be distinguished. This is a condition of scale invariance:

Here are the dynamic and the roughness exponent respectively. From dimensional analysis

From which you get in any dimension and a rough interface below with .

Exercise L2-A: Solve Edwards-Wilkinson

For simplicity, consider a 1-dimensional line of size L with periodic boundary conditions. It is useful to introduce the Fourier modes:

Here and recall .

  • Show that the EW equation writes

The solution of this first order linear equation writes

Assume that the interface is initialy flat, namely .

  • Compute the width . Comment about the roughness and the short times growth.

KPZ equation and interface growth

Consider a domain wall in presence of a positive magnetic field. At variance with the previous case the ferromagnetic domain aligned with the field will expand while the other will shrink. The motion of the interface describes now the growth of the stable domain, an out-of-equilibrium process.

Derivation

To derive the correct equation of a growing interface the key point is to realize that the growth occurs locally along the normal to the interface (see figure).

Let us call the velocity of the interface. Consider a point of the interface , its tangent is . To evaluate the increment use the Pitagora theorem:

Hence, in generic dimension, the KPZ equation is


Scaling Invariance

The symmetry and still holds so that scale invariance is still expected. However the non-linearity originate an anomalous dimension and cannot be determined by simple dimensional analysis.