L-9: Difference between revisions
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Eigenstates= | =Eigenstates= | ||
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | |||
In presence of disorder, three | In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure. | ||
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR). | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
== Delocalized eigenstates== | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=d(1-q) | IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=d(1-q) | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
==Localized eigenstates== | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{1/d} </math> for <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)= \text{const}, \quad \tau_q=0 | IPR(q)= \text{const}, \quad \tau_q=0 | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
==Multifractal eigenstates== | |||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called <Strong> multifractal exponent </Strong>. It is a non decreasing function with q with some special points: | |||
* <math>\tau_0 =-d </math> because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general <math>\tau_0 </math> is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property. | |||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called <Strong> multifractal exponent </Strong>: | |||
* <math>\tau_1 =0 </math> imposed by normalization. | * <math>\tau_1 =0 </math> imposed by normalization. | ||
To have multifractal behaviour we expect | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites} | |\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} \quad \text{for}\; L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
The exponent <math>\alpha </math> is positive and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called <Strong> multifractal spectrum </Strong>. | The exponent <math>\alpha </math> is positive and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called <Strong> multifractal spectrum </Strong>. Its maximum is the fractal dimension of the object, in our case d. We can determine the relation between multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and exponent <math>\tau_q</math> | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q}\sim \int d \alpha L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} | IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q}\sim \int d \alpha L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} | ||
Line 59: | Line 42: | ||
This means that for <math>\alpha^*(q) </math> that verifies <math> | This means that for <math>\alpha^*(q) </math> that verifies <math> | ||
f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q | f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q | ||
</math> we have | </math> | ||
we have | |||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\tau(q)= \alpha^*(q) q -f(\alpha^*(q)) | \tau(q)= \alpha^*(q) q -f(\alpha^*(q)) | ||
Line 66: | Line 49: | ||
<Strong> | <Strong> Delocalized wave functions</Strong> have a simple spectrum: For <math>\alpha=d</math>, we have <math>f(\alpha=d)=d</math> and <math>f(\alpha\ne d ) =-\infty</math>. Then <math>\alpha^*(q)=d </math> becomes <math>q</math> independent. | ||
<Strong> | <Strong> Multifractal wave functions </Strong> smooth this edge dependence and display a smooth spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math> with <math>f(\alpha_0)=d</math>. At <math>q=1</math>, <math>f'(\alpha_1)=1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1)=\alpha_1</math>. | ||
Sometimes one writes: | |||
<center><math> | |||
IPR(q)=L^{D_q(1-q)} \quad \tau_q=D_q(1-q) | |||
</math></center> | |||
Here <math>D_q</math> is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than <math>d</math> and larger than zero. | |||
=Larkin model= | =Larkin model= |
Revision as of 16:05, 23 March 2025
Eigenstates
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).
Delocalized eigenstates
In this case, . Hence, we expect
Localized eigenstates
In this case, for sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
Multifractal eigenstates
The exponent is called multifractal exponent . It is a non decreasing function with q with some special points:
- because the wave fuction is defined on all sites, in general is the fractal dimension of the object we are considering. It is simply a geometrical property.
- imposed by normalization.
To have multifractal behaviour we expect
The exponent is positive and is called multifractal spectrum . Its maximum is the fractal dimension of the object, in our case d. We can determine the relation between multifractal spectrum and exponent
for large L
This means that for that verifies we have
Delocalized wave functions have a simple spectrum: For , we have and . Then becomes independent.
Multifractal wave functions smooth this edge dependence and display a smooth spectrum with a maximum at with . At , and .
Sometimes one writes:
Here is q-dependent multifractal dimension, smaller than and larger than zero.
Larkin model
In your homewoork you solved a toy model for the interface:
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
- The force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up, the length of correlation of the disorder along the h direction . This defines a Larkin length. Indeed from
You get
Above this scale, roguhness change and pinning starts with a crtical force
In we have