L-9: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Eigenstates= | = Eigenstates = | ||
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | ||
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: | In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure. | ||
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR). | To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR). | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
IPR(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q} | \mathrm{IPR}(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q} \sim L^{-\tau_q}. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
== Delocalized eigenstates == | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d}</math>. Hence, we expect | |||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d} </math>. Hence, we expect | <math display="block"> | ||
\mathrm{IPR}(q)=L^{d(1-q)}, | |||
IPR(q)=L^{d(1-q)} | \quad | ||
</math | \tau_q=d(1-q). | ||
</math> | |||
==Localized eigenstates== | == Localized eigenstates == | ||
In this case, <math>|\psi_n|^{2} \approx 1/\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> on <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^{d}</math> sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\mathrm{IPR}(q)=\text{const}, | |||
\quad | |||
\tau_q=0. | |||
</math> | |||
== Multifractal eigenstates == | == Multifractal eigenstates == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 32: | ||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called the '''multifractal exponent'''. It is a non-decreasing function of <math>q</math> with some special points: | The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is called the '''multifractal exponent'''. It is a non-decreasing function of <math>q</math> with some special points: | ||
* | * <math>\tau_0 = -d</math>, since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, <math>\tau_0</math> represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property. | ||
* <math>\tau_1 = 0</math>, imposed by normalization. | |||
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-\alpha} | |||
\quad \text{for}\; | |||
L^{f(\alpha)} \; \text{sites}. | |||
</math> | |||
The exponent <math>\alpha</math> is positive, and <math>f(\alpha)</math> is called the '''multifractal spectrum'''. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is <math>d</math>. | |||
< | |||
The relation between the multifractal spectrum <math>f(\alpha)</math> and the exponent <math>\tau_q</math> is given by: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\mathrm{IPR}(q) = \sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} | |||
\sim \int d\alpha \, L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} | |||
</math> | |||
for large <math>L</math>. From this, we obtain: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\tau(q) = \min_{\alpha} (\alpha q - f(\alpha)). | |||
</math> | |||
This implies that for <math>\alpha^*(q)</math>, which satisfies | This implies that for <math>\alpha^*(q)</math>, which satisfies | ||
<math display="block">f'(\alpha^*(q)) = q,</math> | |||
we have | |||
<math display="block">\tau(q) = \alpha^*(q) q - f(\alpha^*(q)).</math> | |||
'''Delocalized wavefunctions''' have a simple spectrum: for <math>\alpha = d</math>, we find <math>f(\alpha = d) = d</math> and <math>f(\alpha \neq d) = -\infty</math>. This means that <math>\alpha^*(q) = d</math> is independent of <math>q</math>. | '''Delocalized wavefunctions''' have a simple spectrum: for <math>\alpha = d</math>, we find <math>f(\alpha = d) = d</math> and <math>f(\alpha \neq d) = -\infty</math>. This means that <math>\alpha^*(q) = d</math> is independent of <math>q</math>. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 63: | ||
'''Multifractal wavefunctions''' exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math>, where <math>f(\alpha_0) = d</math>. At <math>q = 1</math>, we have <math>f'(\alpha_1) = 1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1) = \alpha_1</math>. | '''Multifractal wavefunctions''' exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at <math>\alpha_0</math>, where <math>f(\alpha_0) = d</math>. At <math>q = 1</math>, we have <math>f'(\alpha_1) = 1</math> and <math>f(\alpha_1) = \alpha_1</math>. | ||
=Larkin model= | = Larkin model = | ||
In your | In your homework you solved a toy model for the interface: | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
\partial_t h(r,t) = | \partial_t h(r,t) = \nabla^2 h(r,t) + F(r). | ||
</math | </math> | ||
For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder | For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder <math>\overline{F(r)}=0</math>, <math>\overline{F(r)F(r')}=\sigma^2 \delta^d(r-r')</math>. | ||
<math>\overline{F(r)}=0</math>, <math> \overline{F(r)F(r')}=\sigma^2 \delta^d(r-r') </math>. | |||
You proved that: | You proved that: | ||
In the real depinning model the disorder is however a non-linear function of h. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up | * the roughness exponent of this model is <math>\zeta_L=\frac{4-d}{2}</math> below dimension 4 | ||
* the force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is <math>f= \sigma/\sqrt{L^d}</math> | |||
\overline{(h(r)-h(0))^2}= | * at long times the interface shape is | ||
</math | <math display="block"> | ||
\overline{h(q)h(-q)} = \frac{\sigma^2}{q^{d+2\zeta_L}}. | |||
</math> | |||
\overline{(h(\ell_L)-h(0))^2}= r_f^2 \ | |||
</math> | In the real depinning model the disorder is, however, a non-linear function of <math>h</math>. The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up to <math>r_f</math>, the correlation length of the disorder <Strong>along the <math>h</math> direction</Strong>. This defines a Larkin length. | ||
Above | |||
Indeed, from | |||
f_c= \frac{\sigma}{\ell_L^{d/(2 \zeta_L)}} | <math display="block"> | ||
</math> | \overline{(h(r)-h(0))^2} | ||
In <math>d=1</math> we have <math>\ell_L=\left(\frac{r_f}{\sigma} \right)^{2/3}</math> | = \int d^d q \,\overline{h(q)h(-q)}\,(1-\cos(q r)) | ||
\sim \sigma^2 r^{2\zeta_L}, | |||
</math> | |||
you get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\overline{(h(\ell_L)-h(0))^2}= r_f^2, | |||
\qquad | |||
\ell_L=\left(\frac{r_f}{\sigma}\right)^{1/\zeta_L}. | |||
</math> | |||
Above this scale, roughness changes and pinning starts with a critical force | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
f_c= \frac{\sigma}{\ell_L^{d/(2 \zeta_L)}}. | |||
</math> | |||
In <math>d=1</math> we have <math>\ell_L=\left(\frac{r_f}{\sigma}\right)^{2/3}</math>. | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 3 March 2026
Eigenstates
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended; localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region; multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale-dependent structure.
To distinguish these regimes, it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR).
Delocalized eigenstates
In this case, . Hence, we expect
Localized eigenstates
In this case, on sites and almost zero elsewhere. Hence, we expect
Multifractal eigenstates
The exponent is called the multifractal exponent. It is a non-decreasing function of with some special points:
- , since the wavefunction is defined on all sites. In general, represents the fractal dimension of the object under consideration and is purely a geometric property.
- , imposed by normalization.
To observe multifractal behavior, we expect:
The exponent is positive, and is called the multifractal spectrum. Its maximum corresponds to the fractal dimension of the object, which in our case is .
The relation between the multifractal spectrum and the exponent is given by: for large . From this, we obtain:
This implies that for , which satisfies we have
Delocalized wavefunctions have a simple spectrum: for , we find and . This means that is independent of .
Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smoother dependence, leading to a continuous spectrum with a maximum at , where . At , we have and .
Larkin model
In your homework you solved a toy model for the interface: For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
- the force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is, however, a non-linear function of . The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up to , the correlation length of the disorder along the direction. This defines a Larkin length.
Indeed, from you get
Above this scale, roughness changes and pinning starts with a critical force
In we have .