L-9: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves. | ||
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: | In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise: | ||
* '''Delocalized eigenstates''', where the wavefunction remains extended over the whole system. | |||
* '''Localized eigenstates''', where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region. | |||
* '''Multifractal eigenstates''', occurring at the '''mobility edge''' of the Anderson transition, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale–dependent structure. | |||
In three dimensions, increasing the disorder strength leads to a transition between a metallic phase with delocalized eigenstates and an insulating phase with localized eigenstates. The critical energy separating these two regimes is called the '''mobility edge'''. Eigenstates at the mobility edge display multifractal statistics. | |||
To characterize these different regimes it is useful to introduce the '''inverse participation ratio''' (IPR) | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\mathrm{IPR}(q)=\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2 q}. | |||
</math> | |||
For a system of linear size <math>L</math>, one typically observes a scaling | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\mathrm{IPR}(q) | \mathrm{IPR}(q) \sim L^{-\tau_q}. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
The exponent <math>\tau_q</math> characterizes the spatial structure of the eigenstate. | |||
== Delocalized eigenstates == | == Delocalized eigenstates == | ||
In | In a delocalized state the probability is spread uniformly over the system: | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
|\psi_n|^{2} \approx L^{-d}. | |||
</math> | |||
Therefore | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\mathrm{IPR}(q) | |||
= | |||
\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} | |||
\sim L^d (L^{-d})^q | |||
= | |||
L^{d(1-q)}. | |||
</math> | |||
Thus | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\tau_q=d(1-q). | \tau_q=d(1-q). | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 52: | ||
== Localized eigenstates == | == Localized eigenstates == | ||
In | In a localized state the wavefunction is concentrated within a region of size <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}</math>. | ||
Roughly | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\mathrm{IPR}(q) | |\psi_n|^2 \sim \xi_{\text{loc}}^{-d} | ||
\ | </math> | ||
on <math>\xi_{\text{loc}}^d</math> sites and negligible elsewhere. Hence | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\mathrm{IPR}(q)\sim \text{const}, | |||
\qquad | |||
\tau_q=0. | \tau_q=0. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Thus localized states do not scale with system size. | |||
== Multifractal eigenstates == | == Multifractal eigenstates == | ||
The | At the mobility edge the eigenstates are neither extended nor localized. Instead, the amplitudes fluctuate strongly across the system. | ||
The scaling of the IPR is characterized by a '''nonlinear function''' | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\tau_q. | |||
</math> | |||
The corresponding '''multifractal dimensions''' are defined as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
D_q=\frac{\tau_q}{q-1}. | |||
</math> | |||
Multifractality means that different moments of the wavefunction probe different effective dimensions. | |||
== Multifractal spectrum == | |||
To describe this structure it is useful to introduce the '''multifractal spectrum''' <math>f(\alpha)</math>. | |||
We assume that the wavefunction amplitudes scale as | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
|\psi_n|^ | |\psi_n|^2 \sim L^{-\alpha} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
on approximately | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
L^{f(\alpha)} | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
sites. | |||
The function <math>f(\alpha)</math> describes the fractal dimension of the set of sites where the wavefunction has exponent <math>\alpha</math>. | |||
Using this representation, | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\ | \mathrm{IPR}(q) | ||
= | |||
\sum_n |\psi_n|^{2q} | |||
\sim | |||
\int d\alpha \, | |||
L^{-\alpha q} L^{f(\alpha)} . | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
For large <math>L</math>, the integral is dominated by the saddle point, giving | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\tau(q)=\min_{\alpha}\left(\alpha q-f(\alpha)\right). | |||
</math> | |||
Thus <math>\tau(q)</math> and <math>f(\alpha)</math> are related by a '''Legendre transform'''. | |||
If <math>\alpha^*(q)</math> satisfies | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
f'(\alpha^*(q))=q, | |||
</math> | |||
then | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\tau(q)=\alpha^*(q)q-f(\alpha^*(q)). | |||
</math> | |||
Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smooth spectrum with maximum | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
f(\alpha_0)=d, | |||
</math> | |||
indicating that the wavefunction explores the entire system but with strong spatial fluctuations. | |||
= Larkin model = | = Larkin model = | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 15 March 2026
Eigenstates
Without disorder, the eigenstates are delocalized plane waves.
In the presence of disorder, three scenarios can arise:
- Delocalized eigenstates, where the wavefunction remains extended over the whole system.
- Localized eigenstates, where the wavefunction is exponentially confined to a finite region.
- Multifractal eigenstates, occurring at the mobility edge of the Anderson transition, where the wavefunction exhibits a complex, scale–dependent structure.
In three dimensions, increasing the disorder strength leads to a transition between a metallic phase with delocalized eigenstates and an insulating phase with localized eigenstates. The critical energy separating these two regimes is called the mobility edge. Eigenstates at the mobility edge display multifractal statistics.
To characterize these different regimes it is useful to introduce the inverse participation ratio (IPR)
For a system of linear size , one typically observes a scaling
The exponent characterizes the spatial structure of the eigenstate.
Delocalized eigenstates
In a delocalized state the probability is spread uniformly over the system:
Therefore
Thus
Localized eigenstates
In a localized state the wavefunction is concentrated within a region of size .
Roughly
on sites and negligible elsewhere. Hence
Thus localized states do not scale with system size.
Multifractal eigenstates
At the mobility edge the eigenstates are neither extended nor localized. Instead, the amplitudes fluctuate strongly across the system.
The scaling of the IPR is characterized by a nonlinear function
The corresponding multifractal dimensions are defined as
Multifractality means that different moments of the wavefunction probe different effective dimensions.
Multifractal spectrum
To describe this structure it is useful to introduce the multifractal spectrum .
We assume that the wavefunction amplitudes scale as
on approximately
sites.
The function describes the fractal dimension of the set of sites where the wavefunction has exponent .
Using this representation,
For large , the integral is dominated by the saddle point, giving
Thus and are related by a Legendre transform.
If satisfies
then
Multifractal wavefunctions exhibit a smooth spectrum with maximum
indicating that the wavefunction explores the entire system but with strong spatial fluctuations.
Larkin model
In your homework you solved a toy model for the interface: For simplicity, we assume Gaussian disorder , .
You proved that:
- the roughness exponent of this model is below dimension 4
- the force per unit length acting on the center of the interface is
- at long times the interface shape is
In the real depinning model the disorder is, however, a non-linear function of . The idea of Larkin is that this linearization is correct up to , the correlation length of the disorder along the direction. This defines a Larkin length.
Indeed, from you get
Above this scale, roughness changes and pinning starts with a critical force
In we have .